> On Nov 12, 2019, at 1:41 PM, Paul Barker wrote:
>
> have a look at my slides at the start of the Day 1 slide deck at
> https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/YP_Summit_Lyon_2019.
This is a great resource for layer best practices. Thanks Paul!
-brad
--
> On Nov 12, 2019, at 1:55 AM, Kun Yi wrote:
>
> Sure, it's partially due to how we set up the build downstream. Our
> downstream would put all the needed layers in one bblayers file, so we would
> have something like:
>
> ##OEROOT##/meta \
> ##OEROOT##/meta-poky \
>
How silly would it be to try and get GCC sdk v8 complied and installed for
Jethro?
--
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
at 5:16 PM, Jae Hyun Yoo wrote:
On 8/27/2019 5:00 PM, Brad Bishop wrote:
On Sun, 2019-08-25 at 10:49 -0700, akuster808 wrote:
the meta-security layer should be fix now.
please update and let me know if not.
Thanks Armin!
Jae, I've pulled this into OpenBMC. Can you give it a try?
Thanks
On Sun, 2019-08-25 at 10:49 -0700, akuster808 wrote:
> the meta-security layer should be fix now.
>
> please update and let me know if not.
Thanks Armin!
Jae, I've pulled this into OpenBMC. Can you give it a try?
-brad
--
___
yocto mailing list
at 6:38 PM, James Feist wrote:
On 8/22/19 3:35 PM, Jae Hyun Yoo wrote:
Hi brad,
+ The mailing list
We met a build break while making Intel platform builds.
ERROR: No recipes available for:
/home/yoojae/workspace/openbmc/meta-security/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-stable_5.2.bbappend
It was
at 10:28 AM, Schmitt, Richard wrote:
Not sure the type of lvm you're trying to use, but we successfully build
a dm-verity rootfs offline.
It probably is specific to what type of lvm you are using.
Rich
Thanks for the reply Rich!
I’m not exactly sure what is meant by LVM type. If I look
Does anyone have any experience with assembling an lvm disk image from a
bitbake task? My naiive approach to this would be to invent and implement
an IMAGE_FSTYPE that builds up the image in a do_image_foo task.
But the LVM userspace tools don’t do offline mode so this seems to require
I am trying to expand an existing package (base-passwd) and having it place
/etc/passwd into /tmp/
I'm failing pretty miserably and am looking for some hints/tips.
Mark Bishop
Sr. Firmware/Software Engineer - Microwave Subsystems
[cid:image001.png@01D281ED.A45F0A90]
4726 Eisenhower Blvd
to do that in Yocto. Could anyone walk me through it and if
I am in the wrong spot, my apologies.
Mark Bishop
Sr. Firmware/Software Engineer - Microwave Subsystems
[cid:image001.png@01D281ED.A45F0A90]
4726 Eisenhower Blvd.
Tampa, FL 33634
USA
T +1 813 901 7293
mbis
know what I'm doing here and I could use some
sage advice on how to move these startup levels around.
Thank you.
Mark Bishop
Sr. Firmware/Software Engineer - Microwave Subsystems
[cid:image001.png@01D281ED.A45F0A90]
4726 Eisenhower Blvd.
Tampa, FL 33634
USA
T +1 813 901 7293
mbis...@smithsi
fi
cd ${S}
if [ ! -f "Makefile" ]; then
And everything is working but it seems that this would be the wrong way to do
this as this is me editing a base class file.
From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.
I am trying to compile a kernel located in SVN.
I get this error message:
ERROR: linux-xlnx-4.9-xilinx-v2017.2+git20-r0 do_kernel_checkout: S
/tmp/stride/work-shared/plnx_arm/kernel-source is not set to the linux source
directory. Check
ERROR: linux-xlnx-4.9-xilinx-v2017.2+git20-r0
python-foomodule-native. And given that the target -dev packages get included
in the SDK when you do this…the same doesn’t appear to be the case for python
modules?
I feel like I am missing a fundamental concept.
Thx for your time.
-brad bishop
14 matches
Mail list logo
