> it installs nothing.
The kernel-modules package is a meta-package. It is supposed to be
empty. It has RDEPENDS on all of the other modules that were built. So
if you install it, it pulls in all of the build and packaged modules.
That works for rpm/ipk, or whatever package format you are usin
m
> picking up the pieces.
The "kernel-modules" package is a meta package that installs all built
modules onto the system.
So unless you are really size constrained on the device, use it, and
you'll get everything that was configured and built as a module.
Bruce
>
> -Thanks!
On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 11:30 AM Wayne Li wrote:
>
> Dear Yocto Developers,
>
> I'm trying to get KVM added and working on a Yocto kernel I built up for a
> T4240 RDB (has a PowerPC CPU). KVM isn't working and the reason why it isn't
> working seems to be I'm missing the necessary kernel modules
On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 11:06 AM Dimitris Tassopoulos wrote:
>
> Hi all. I have a weird issue with the kernel modules not being installed in
> the image and also not packaged.
> I see the packages for individual "kernel-module-*.ipk" modules but the
> "kernel-modules_*.ipk" is always
> empty.
>
>
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 5:50 AM Diego Santa Cruz
wrote:
>
> > From: Bruce Ashfield
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 1:11 PM Diego Santa Cruz
> > wrote:
> > >
>
> > > Can anyone provide some advice as to what would be the recommended way
> >
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 1:11 PM Diego Santa Cruz
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I have not received any feedback on the below email and I am not sure I am
> doing the right thing.
>
>
>
> Can anyone provide some advice as to what would be the recommended way to
> apply kernel patches listed in a mybsp-p
Hi Diego,
I didn't see your original email. I'm stepping out for a holiday
weekend now, but will write up an explanation of the history reasons
for what you are seeing when I get a few minutes over the next few
days.
Cheers,
Bruce
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 1:11 PM Diego Santa Cruz
wrote:
>
> Hi,
On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 11:40 AM Shravan Singh wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to build an out of tree service module on a yocto raspberry pi
> image(target system).
> I am using yocto version warrior
> and my machine is Raspberrypi-cm3
> Kernel version is 4.19.58
>
> I was able to get the build
From: Bruce Ashfield
Updating the reference BSP SRCREVs and versions to 5.2.17 to match
the latest for qemu* and to pickup some reference board specific
patches.
Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield
---
v2: make sure that genericx86 and beaglebone-yocto are updated
.../linux/linux-yocto_5.2
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 12:55 PM wrote:
> From: Bruce Ashfield
>
> Updating the reference BSP SRCREVs and versions to 5.2.17 to match
> the latest for qemu* and to pickup some reference board specific
> patches.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield
> ---
> .../lin
From: Bruce Ashfield
Updating the reference BSP SRCREVs and versions to 5.2.17 to match
the latest for qemu* and to pickup some reference board specific
patches.
Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield
---
.../linux/linux-yocto_5.2.bbappend | 16
1 file changed, 8
On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 4:53 AM vygu wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Just to signal there are several mistakes with the recipe "perf.bb" from poky
> on master (currently: e2bde009b325b40641407ecf50f54ed8c41726d6)
>
> - If "Python 3 is not yet supported" by "perf" sources, it causes an issue
> during the do
merged
Bruce
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 2:13 AM wrote:
>
> From: Changqing Li
>
> Signed-off-by: Changqing Li
> ---
> recipes-extended/glusterfs/glusterfs.inc | 8 +---
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/recipes-extended/glusterfs/glusterfs.inc
> b/recipes-ex
/pipermail/linux-yocto/2019-August/007908.html
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hao
Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield
---
v2:
This is a minor tweak to the SRCREVs from Kevin's original version,
everything else is unchanged.
The meta changes are also in the latest linux-yocto 5.2 recipes.
Bruce
...
On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 7:43 AM praveen vattipalli
wrote:
>
> Hi All,
> we are upgrading Yocto from Krogath to Sumo version.
> while using meta-altera kernel source as local source,
>
> if i use EXTERNALSRC_BUILD variable
> EXTERNALSRC =
> "${TOPDIR}/../meta-altera/recipes-kernel/linux/files/ker
merged.
Bruce
On Sun, Jun 30, 2019 at 10:09 PM wrote:
>
> From: Mingli Yu
>
> As nss-pam-ldapd depends on libpam, it should do
> required distro feature check for pam.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mingli Yu
> ---
> recipes-support/nss-pam-ldapd/nss-pam-ldapd_0.9.8.bb | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insert
merged
Bruce
On Sun, Jun 30, 2019 at 10:08 PM wrote:
>
> From: Mingli Yu
>
> Since spice of meta-cloud-services depends on
> cyrus-sasl which comes from networking-layer,
> add missing layer depends back.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mingli Yu
> ---
> conf/layer.conf | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 inserti
s perhaps being selected by an
option, or a default configuration was being assumed .. you will see
some minor deltas.
Bruce
>
> Pierluigi
>
> On 06/06/19 15:47, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 9:38 AM Pierluigi Greto
> > wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >
On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 9:38 AM Pierluigi Greto wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have to create a custom 4.14.49 linux kernel. In my recipe I have added my
> defconfig, but yocto it's not taking in consideration the defconfig. Instead
> it's building the kernel using the default values. Also the compilation
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 8:37 AM Belisko Marek wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 2:35 PM Bruce Ashfield
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 4:14 AM Belisko Marek
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm trying to ad
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 4:14 AM Belisko Marek wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to add support for latest possible released kernel in
> meta-sunxi by using poky warrior and hit this QA issue:
> ERROR: linux-mainline-5.2-rc2-r0 do_package: QA Issue: linux-mainline:
> Files/directories were installed bu
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 12:27 PM Mauro Ziliani wrote:
>
> Hi all.
>
> How can I ask to bitbake which is the actual value of virtual/kernel?
>
Here's one way:
bitbake -e virtual/kernel | grep PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual\/kernel
# $PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel [2 operations]
PREFERRED_PROVIDE
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 8:50 AM Bruce Ashfield
wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 7:24 AM Zoran Stojsavljevic <
> zoran.stojsavlje...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> As I said, I am a man of experimental try-outs. And here is the try!
>>
>> Now, after setting
V_TOOLS} \
>> > > systemtap \
>> > > "
>> > >
>> > > Problem with this approach is that such a kernel makes the
>> rootfs too
>> > > big and impractical:
>> > > -rw-r--r--. 2 user vboxusers 101499952 Ma
the kernel.
I'm going to create two new optional packages for the fall release that are
simply captured kernel-source and kernel-headers for those uses cases where
someone really does want the entire source tree, or just the headers. The
details for that work are in bugzilla.
Bruce
&g
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 12:20 PM Andrei Gherzan wrote:
>
> On 23/05/2019 17.11, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 11:24 AM Andrei Gherzan wrote:
>
>> On 23/05/2019 16.10, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 11:24 AM Andrei Gherzan wrote:
> On 23/05/2019 16.10, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 11:00 AM Andrei Gherzan wrote:
>
>>
>> On 23/05/2019 15.39, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 11:00 AM Andrei Gherzan wrote:
>
> On 23/05/2019 15.39, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 10:32 AM Bruce Ashfield
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 9:56 AM Andrei Gherzan wrote:
>>
>>>
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 10:39 AM Andrei Gherzan wrote:
> On 23/05/2019 15.32, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 9:56 AM Andrei Gherzan wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> This might have been discussed before. I couldn't find a relevant
>&
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 10:32 AM Bruce Ashfield
wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 9:56 AM Andrei Gherzan wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> This might have been discussed before. I couldn't find a relevant
>> thread, but if it is so, just link me to
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 9:56 AM Andrei Gherzan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This might have been discussed before. I couldn't find a relevant
> thread, but if it is so, just link me to it.
>
> Since thud, more specific since
>
> commit 9af0f1a46bbb6ad9ee8b35957251f4aa826b
being said, they are optional. I might be misreading, but what exactly
are you trying to build that requires that specific structure ? We are both
rebuilding the entire kernel and out of tree modules all the time with the
existing structure/path of the on-target installs.
kernel-devsrc itself
e not alone in not going to it first.
Hopefully I'll get some new patches out in the coming month before summer
holidays really kick in.
Bruce
> Just thinking loud...
>
> Zoran
> ___
>
> On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 4:25 PM Bruce Ashfield
> wrote:
> >
> >
>
l for a release. And IIRC the autobuilders
are using a sato based image (Richard could confirm more easily that I
could what image type the autobuilders are using for hello-world on target
module tests).
Bruce
>
> Thank you,
> Zoran
> ___
>
>
> On Wed, May 15, 20
On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 1:30 PM Zoran Stojsavljevic <
zoran.stojsavlje...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Chris, Bruce,
>
> I have some additional data to share with you both, since I have tried
> something. And here is my take on the things!
>
> > 1. Build using a bb recipe.
> > Take a look at meta-ske
On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 6:54 AM Zoran Stojsavljevic <
zoran.stojsavlje...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello to the YOCTO community,
>
> I am using (to build the target for Beagle Bone Black) the following
> script:
> https://github.com/ZoranStojsavljevic/bbb-yocto
> https://github.com/ZoranStojsavljevic/b
tojsavljevic/bbb-yocto/blob/master/bbb-releases/bbb-warrior/target-bbb-platform-traces.txt
>
>
While interesting .. it really isn't relevant in this context. But thanks
for sharing anyway!
Cheers,
Bruce
> Thank you,
> Zoran
> ___
>
> On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 2:53 PM Bruc
On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 8:10 AM Kevin Hao wrote:
> Boot test for all these boards.
>
>
I do have more -stable updates coming, and you are seeing some queued 5.0.x
changes that I haven't sent yet (since I'm hung up on resolving a 4.19
conflict for one of the SoC branches), but yes, the changes here
On Sat, May 4, 2019 at 10:07 AM Emily Smith wrote:
> Hi Randy -
>
> Good point it might be. Should I ask the meta-Xilinx maintainers about
> getting it in there?
>
>
That's probably the right thing to do, and/or just ask on the xilinx
mailing list what the plans are for releasing the code in a la
On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 6:09 AM Priyanshu Sharma <
ms.priyanshu.sha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> How can we remove inclusion of any package which comes because some other
> package RDPENDS on it?
>
> For example, rpcbind recipe RDEPENDS on shadow and libpam packages,
> because of which if IMAGE_
On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 9:54 PM nick wrote:
>
> Greetings,
> I was trying to build a kernel with these files in a new layer for no smp to
> be enabled but have no
> idea why it doesn't work. This is after looking at the kernel manual and it's
> literally the same
> files excluding the disabling
From: Bruce Ashfield
Updating poky-tiny to prefer 5.0 as the kernel version. Boot
tested against qemux86 and qemuarm. This removes the last user
of the 4.18 kernel, so we can queue it for removal from master.
Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield
---
meta-poky/conf/distro/poky-tiny.conf | 2 +-
1
On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 7:42 PM Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 5:28 PM akuster808 wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I noticed there are 3 kernels in Warrior. 4.18, 4.19 an 5.0. Do we
> > really need 4.18?
> > I see its the default version
On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 5:28 PM akuster808 wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I noticed there are 3 kernels in Warrior. 4.18, 4.19 an 5.0. Do we
> really need 4.18?
> I see its the default version for poky-tiny. 4.18 is EOL but maintained
> by Windriver.
4.18 needed to be around through M3 to backstop some lay
merged
Bruce
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 10:52 PM Zhixiong Chi
wrote:
>
> Add the default route option for the operation of adding route,
> while we set the static route and the mask setting is 0.
>
> For example:
> add_routes 32 169 254 169 254 10 209 67 4 0 10 209 67 1
>
> The first route (169.254
From: Bruce Ashfield
The 5.0 kernel is available and 4.18 will soon be dropped,
so we updated the preferred version to 5.0.
Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield
---
meta-poky/conf/distro/poky.conf | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/meta-poky/conf/distro/poky.conf b
From: Kevin Hao
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hao
Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield
---
meta-yocto-bsp/conf/machine/beaglebone-yocto.conf | 2 +-
meta-yocto-bsp/conf/machine/edgerouter.conf | 2 +-
meta-yocto-bsp/conf/machine/mpc8315e-rdb.conf | 2 +-
3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3
From: Kevin Hao
Boot test for all the boards.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hao
Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield
---
.../linux/linux-yocto_5.0.bbappend| 24 +--
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta-yocto-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_5.0
From: Bruce Ashfield
Although the hardware reference boards are not using the 5.x
kernel yet, we generate a baseline bbappend for future work.
Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield
---
.../linux/linux-yocto_5.0.bbappend| 27 +++
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
create
From: Bruce Ashfield
This is a follow on to my oe-core series that introduces the 5.0
kernel. Once that is merged (and all outstanding issues resolved),
these can be applied to make the default 5.0 for poky and the
reference BSPs.
The removal of 4.18 from master will follow once everything is
On 2019-02-02 10:16 p.m., Ken Sloat wrote:
On Sat, Feb 2, 2019 at 10:03 PM Bruce Ashfield
wrote:
On 2019-02-02 9:59 p.m., Ken Sloat wrote:
Hello,
I have an out of tree kernel module which I want autoloaded at startup
on my system. Looking at the Yocto project manual, I see that one way
I
On 2019-02-02 9:59 p.m., Ken Sloat wrote:
Hello,
I have an out of tree kernel module which I want autoloaded at startup
on my system. Looking at the Yocto project manual, I see that one way
I can do this is to add the module name to the KERNEL_MODULE_AUTOLOAD
variable within my custom module rec
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 9:50 PM Chuck Wolber wrote:
>
> This question is with respect to the Yocto thud (2.6.x) branch. I have also
> reviewed section 2.3.3 and 2.3.4 of the Kernel Development document.
>
>
> My kernel configuration (cfg) seems to be overridden by KERNEL_FEATURES and
> it is not
On 2019-01-07 9:00 a.m., Kristupas Savickas wrote:
Hello,
I'm porting a kernel to use yocto-style build process. The kernel
fetches fine, but there's a problem with '.config' file generation. I'd
like to supply a 'defconfig' and a configuration fragment file
'test.cfg' (which should be overla
On 12/17/18 8:50 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
Bruce,
On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 2:47 PM Bruce Ashfield
wrote:
Yocto seems to try a different approach.
When I use qemux86-64.conf with DEFAULTTUNE being "i586" it generates a 32bit
toolchain by default.
Build Configuration:
On 12/17/18 7:25 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
[Resending with correct mail]
Richard,
On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 11:34 AM wrote:
On Mon, 2018-12-17 at 11:26 +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 9:42 AM Richard Purdie
wrote:
The system can definitely do it, its just not so
Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield
---
This goes along with the series just sent to oe-core to remove 4.14 and
introduce 4.19 as the LTS (and LSB) kernel.
Bruce
meta-poky/conf/distro/poky-lsb.conf | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/meta-poky/conf/distro/poky
On 2018-12-12 8:36 p.m., Hongzhi, Song wrote:
Thanks.
So would you help to remedy the commit log while merging the patch?
I've tweaked the message and added this to my queue. It will
come out early this week.
Bruce
--Hongzhi
On 12/13/2018 02:45 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12/11
On 12/11/18 5:12 AM, Hongzhi.Song wrote:
The cmd line, , can't
match all expect config options.
This is because that it is not always space after 'config'
This should say "not always one space". There really should
always just be a single space, but typos do sneak in. I'll
queue the patch shor
On 2018-11-19 2:13 p.m., Sakib Sajal wrote:
Hello,
I have been trying to patch the linux kernel and add some kernel
configuration but I am failing to add kconfig fragments to be included
in the final build.
Initially I tried patching the kernel with hardcoded values in the patch.
I am build
On 2018-11-15 12:29 p.m., Jon Mason wrote:
I'm having difficulty determining where the kernel defconfigs are
defined and located. I'm specifically looking for the qemuarm and
qemuarm64 kernel defconfigs. I've looked at the relevant
documentation,
https://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/2.5.1/kernel-
On 2018-11-06 8:07 p.m., akuster808 wrote:
On 11/6/18 2:42 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 2018-11-06 5:10 PM, akuster808 wrote:
On 11/6/18 2:05 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 1:57 PM Armin Kuster
wrote:
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster
---
kver | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion
On 2018-11-06 5:10 PM, akuster808 wrote:
On 11/6/18 2:05 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 1:57 PM Armin Kuster wrote:
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster
---
kver | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kver b/kver
index 7b008cd..5ccc572 100644
--- a/kver
+++
On 2018-11-02 4:59 AM, Kevin Hao wrote:
On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 09:01:34AM +0100, Heiko Schocher wrote:
Hello Kevin,
Am 01.11.2018 um 03:18 schrieb Kevin Hao:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 02:23:00PM +0100, Heiko Schocher wrote:
Hello all,
just builded core-image-minimal with current head of thud
On 10/31/18 9:23 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
Hello all,
just builded core-image-minimal with current head of thud branch for
the beaglebone-yocto machine, with linux 4.14.x LTS "Linux version
4.14.78",
installed the resulting sd card image and boot it, and get:
INIT: Id "O0" respawning too fast
On 10/31/18 7:03 AM, Jairo wrote:
Hi all,
I need to install an avahi service on rocko for (a node of) node-red.
OK, I have an avahi_0.6.32.bb recipe at 'sources/poky/meta/recipes-
connectivity/avahi/' which path is added at bblayers.conf file.
but if I add the package at local.conf file like t
On 2018-10-29 11:18 AM, Bas Mevissen wrote:
On 2018-10-29 16:14, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 2018-10-29 11:12 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 6:46 AM Bruce Ashfield
wrote:
On 10/29/2018 9:10 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 6:54 AM Bruce Ashfield
wrote:
On 10/26
On 2018-10-29 11:12 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 6:46 AM Bruce Ashfield
wrote:
On 10/29/2018 9:10 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 6:54 AM Bruce Ashfield
wrote:
On 10/26/2018 4:28 AM, Måns Zigher wrote:
So it looks like the number of /bin/awk have increased
On 10/29/2018 9:10 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 6:54 AM Bruce Ashfield
wrote:
On 10/26/2018 4:28 AM, Måns Zigher wrote:
So it looks like the number of /bin/awk have increased so the patch will
fix one problem but there is more to fix. I have a "workaround" even
t
On 10/26/2018 4:28 AM, Måns Zigher wrote:
So it looks like the number of /bin/awk have increased so the patch will
fix one problem but there is more to fix. I have a "workaround" even
though I am not so sure it is a workaround or not. The problem is fixed
adding to kernel-devsrc.bbappend
do
On 10/22/18 5:07 AM, Urs Fässler wrote:
It is not the expected behavior that changes on the .cfg files only
referenced from .scc files are not detected.
This looks good to me.
Also note that I have an outstanding bugzilla to see if I can invalidate
stamps, etc, when these elements change .. so
Wrong mailing list. Use meta-virtualization for these patches.
I'm cross posting this there, for the archives.
I've grabbed and merged this change (but could easily have missed
it, since it was the wrong list and I wasn't directly copied).
Bruce
On 10/15/18 9:45 PM, kai.k...@windriver.com wrot
idn't
got any reply there I've also asked here in case that someone else
shares the same experience.
Dimitris
On Wed, 10 Oct 2018, 21:48 Bruce Ashfield, <mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com>> wrote:
On 2018-10-10 2:18 PM, Dimitris Tassopoulos wrote:
> Hi all!
On 2018-10-10 2:18 PM, Dimitris Tassopoulos wrote:
Hi all!
I've tried to build the latest preempt-rt kernel from the
`v4.14/standard/preempt-rt/base`
and it fails to build. These are the hashes I've used:
This should go to the linux-yocto list, since that's where
people interested in the li
gards,
Greg Wilson-Lindberg
Principal Firmware Engineer | Sakura Finetek USA, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Greg Wilson-Lindberg
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2018 09:31 AM
To: 'Bruce Ashfield' ; yocto@yoctoproject.org
Subject: RE: [yocto] changing kernel config in Morty
perly applied.
Sorry I couldn't be of more help.
Cheers,
Bruce
Thank you for taking a look at this.
Regards,
Greg Wilson-Lindberg
*From:* yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org
on behalf of Greg Wilson-Lindberg
the root cause in the morning!
Bruce
Regards,
Greg Wilson-Lindberg
*From:* yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org
on behalf of Greg Wilson-Lindberg
*Sent:* Friday, October 5, 2018 9:23:52 AM
*To:* Bruce Ashfield; yocto@yoctopr
On 2018-10-04 4:38 PM, Greg Wilson-Lindberg wrote:
Does anybody else have any idea about what is going on here?
I can't tell from the information provided.
But if you can send me a set of layers to clone, and
configure locally, I can figure it out.
Cheers,
Bruce
Yocto is seeing my request
On 2018-10-01 8:42 AM, Urs Fässler wrote:
Recommend to add recipe-space features to SRC_URI so that changes to them
are detected automatically.
Signed-off-by: Urs Fässler
Signed-off-by: Pascal Bach
---
documentation/kernel-dev/kernel-dev-common.xml | 7 +--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(
On 2018-09-29 5:26 AM, changqing...@windriver.com wrote:
From: Changqing Li
fix below warning:
do_package_qa: QA Issue: ELF binary 'xxx/usr/bin/docker'
has relocations in .text [textrel]
Signed-off-by: Changqing Li
---
recipes-containers/docker/docker_git.bb| 1 +
.../files/00
These are all to the wrong mailing list, please resend them
to the meta-virtualization list.
On 2018-09-29 5:26 AM, changqing...@windriver.com wrote:
From: Changqing Li
fix below warning:
1.do_package_qa: QA Issue: No GNU_HASH in the elf binary:
xxx/usr/sbin/registry' [ldflags]
2.do_package_
On 09/26/2018 09:43 PM, meng...@windriver.com wrote:
From: Limeng
Hi Bruce,
The FPGA IO peripheral is only in specific FPGA design on Intel-PSG Stratix10
development board, and not all FPGA designs include FPGA IO. In addtional, this
part of resource <0xf9001080 0x4> is able to be used for an
On 09/27/2018 02:45 AM, meng...@windriver.com wrote:
From: Limeng
Hi Bruce,
Get below patches for double bits ecc error detection feature
0001-Documentation-dt-edac-Move-Altera-SOCFPGA-EDAC-file.patch
0002-EDAC-altera-Handle-SDRAM-Uncorrectable-Errors-on-Str.patch
0003-EDAC-altera-Fix-ARM64-
On 09/26/2018 12:03 AM, meng...@windriver.com wrote:
From: Limeng
Hi Bruce,
Add 2 spi-norflash support Stratix10 SoC platform.
Macronix 512Mb MX25U51245GXDI00
Macronix 2Gb MX66U2G45G
merged
Bruce
patches as below:
0001-spi-nor-add-support-for-mx66u2g45g.patch
0002-spi-nor-add-support-f
On 09/27/2018 11:32 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
This will show up in the -stable updates. I typically prefer to
wait for these to cycle through that process, rather than applying
them directly .. since it means I will have rebase / conflicts when
I merge the -stable updates.
That being said, it
This will show up in the -stable updates. I typically prefer to
wait for these to cycle through that process, rather than applying
them directly .. since it means I will have rebase / conflicts when
I merge the -stable updates.
That being said, it is fairly trivial, so I've applied it to the
-dev
On 09/27/2018 02:15 AM, ?? wrote:
$ git clone git://git.yoctoproject.org/poky
$ cd poky
$ . ./oe-init-build-env build-bbb
edit conf/local.conf to set MACHINE ??= "beaglebone-yocto"
$ echo "PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel = \"linux-yocto-rt\"" >>
conf/local.conf
$ bitbake -v core-image-r
On 2018-09-25 10:03 PM, Aaron Cohen wrote:
http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky/tree/meta/classes/kernel-yocto.bbclass#n297
With no KCONFIG_MODE specified, we check if the user has copied a
defconfig to workdir, and then use allnoconfig if so. Shouldn't we be
using alldefconfig in th
4.18 is replacing 4.15 as the latest kernel in the upcoming
release, so we drop this dangling bbappend.
Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield
---
.../recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_4.15.bbappend | 27 --
1 file changed, 27 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644
meta-yocto-bsp/recipes
4.18 will be the newest kernel in the upcoming release, so we bump
our default to it in preparation of 4.15 being dropped.
Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield
---
meta-poky/conf/distro/poky.conf | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/meta-poky/conf/distro/poky.conf b/meta
4.18 will be the newest kernel in the upcoming release, so we bump
our default to it in preparation of 4.15 being dropped.
Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield
---
meta-poky/conf/distro/poky.conf | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/meta-poky/conf/distro/poky.conf b/meta
On 08/22/2018 10:40 AM, Sarayu Sivanandam wrote:
Hi all, Is anyone currently working on creating a recipe for LXD? I want
to create a recipe for LXD for my project and any inputs for the same is
welcome. Thanks and Regards
check on the meta-virtualization list. We already have lxc and the
supp
On 7/27/2018 6:20 PM, Greg Wilson-Lindberg wrote:
I'm trying to add a couple of drivers to the kernel in a Raspberry pi3
build.
I've got the passing of the config options working, but I'm getting
warnings from the kernel build that the options are not being applied:
WARNING: linux-raspberryp
On 2018-07-24 9:47 PM, He Zhe wrote:
On 2018年07月25日 04:07, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 2018-07-23 10:07 PM, He Zhe wrote:
On 2018年07月24日 03:21, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
Which version/branches is this for ?
This is for linux-yocto rt branches. linux-yocto-4.12 does not need this
fix, since
On 06/21/2018 02:11 AM, Changqing Li wrote:
spice have been export to meta-openembedded/meta-networking,
and have newer version. spice under this layer now have
compile error, but spice under networking layer don't.
Maybe we should not maintain 2 same spices, so delete it.
I'm going to hold ont
On 2018-06-11 6:17 AM, Kevin Hao wrote:
We used the CFLAGS_xxx to workaround the gcc 8 build warnings
for some specific file. But CFLAGS_xxx is also used with '=' in
other places of this Makefile. This override the gcc 8 workaround,
so replace all the '=' with '+=" to fix this issue.
merged. SR
11, Jakob Hasse wrote:
On 04.06.2018 17:53, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 2018-06-01 12:15 PM, Jakob Hasse wrote:
Hello Bruce,
Thank you very much for the quick response. I tried to built in the
kernel changes. But the iptables error persists.
I double checked over the weekend, and I have no prob
d, but without a reproducer on oe-core, chances are that it
won't be easily resolved.
At a glance, it isn't clear to me how systemd is causing your
busybox-hwclock
issue. But if you check the list, that particular package has recently
been moved around/broken out. So I'd suggest making sur
On 2018-05-31 7:00 AM, Jakob Hasse wrote:
Hello,
Make sure to cc meta-virtualization on questions like this, since
that is where you'll get more eyes that are running docker
all the time.
I ran into trouble running docker on our target.
1. When I want to start docker, I first have to re-mount
d by docker.
Signed-off-by: Mark Asselstine
Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield
* Now meta-oe upreved python-requests to 2.18.4, remove
PREFERRED_VERSION limit to avoid bitbake messages like:
"NOTE: preferred version 2.13.0 of python-requests not available"
Signed-off-by: Mingli Yu
1 - 100 of 1414 matches
Mail list logo
