Re: [yocto] ***SPAM*** Re: [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH 5/8] Support for vc4 graphics driver: upgrade 4.4 kernel to 4.4.10

2016-05-20 Thread Khem Raj
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 3:51 AM, Andrei Gherzan wrote: > On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 12:47:40PM +0200, Herve Jourdain wrote: >> Hi Andrei, Khem, >> >> That's what I implemented in the upcoming v2 - except for the python >> checking function part. >> One thing, shall I call the variable CMA_SIZE, or VC

Re: [yocto] ***SPAM*** Re: [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH 5/8] Support for vc4 graphics driver: upgrade 4.4 kernel to 4.4.10

2016-05-20 Thread Andrei Gherzan
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 12:47:40PM +0200, Herve Jourdain wrote: > Hi Andrei, Khem, > > That's what I implemented in the upcoming v2 - except for the python > checking function part. > One thing, shall I call the variable CMA_SIZE, or VC4_CMA_SIZE? > I know CMA is kind of common, but we're using thi

Re: [yocto] ***SPAM*** Re: [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH 5/8] Support for vc4 graphics driver: upgrade 4.4 kernel to 4.4.10

2016-05-20 Thread Herve Jourdain
Hi Andrei, Khem, That's what I implemented in the upcoming v2 - except for the python checking function part. One thing, shall I call the variable CMA_SIZE, or VC4_CMA_SIZE? I know CMA is kind of common, but we're using this only to trigger a parameter to the v4c overlay. Any opinion? (in the curr