Re: [yocto] Bitbake failure:

Thanks, I'll look into it. For yocto-2.5 M3 rc1 they have given as bitbake -c fetchall core-image-sato That means it is a failure. On Tue, Mar 27, 2018, 7:52 PM Joshua Watt wrote: > On Tue, 2018-03-27 at 09:19 +, pawanKumar wrote: > > Thanks for your tip. > Can I use

Re: [yocto] Bitbake failure:

Thanks for your tip. Can I use capital c in place of small c. On Fri, Mar 23, 2018, 9:20 PM Joshua Watt wrote: > On Fri, 2018-03-23 at 07:31 +, pawanKumar wrote: > > Hi team, > When I tried to run (bitbate -c fetchall) it is giving error as > "target do_fetchall is not

Re: [yocto] Bitbake failure:

On Tue, 2018-03-27 at 09:19 +, pawanKumar wrote: > Thanks for your tip.Can I use capital c in place of small c. Not quite sure what you mean. If you are trying to do: bitbake -C fetchall core-image-sato that doesn't work anymore AFAIK. I don't think there is currently a way to do a "force

Re: [yocto] Bitbake failure:

On Fri, 2018-03-23 at 07:31 +, pawanKumar wrote: > Hi team,When I tried to run (bitbate -c fetchall) it is giving error > as > "target do_fetchall is not found for image core-image-sato". > How to over come this error. I believe fetchall was superseded by --runall. Try: bitbake --runall

[yocto] Bitbake failure:

Hi team, When I tried to run (bitbate -c fetchall) it is giving error as "target do_fetchall is not found for image core-image-sato". How to over come this error. Regards Pavan. -- ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org

Re: [yocto] [bitbake] Failure to compile UltraJson, LMDB and Netifaces python modules recipes for Krogoth.

> On Dec 22, 2016, at 12:20 AM, Mateusz Orzoł > wrote: > > > > W dniu 2016-12-22 o 09:16, Mateusz Orzoł pisze: >> >> >> W dniu 2016-12-21 o 18:21, Khem Raj pisze: >>> On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 10:54 PM, Mateusz Orzoł >>>

Re: [yocto] [bitbake] Failure to compile UltraJson, LMDB and Netifaces python modules recipes for Krogoth.

W dniu 2016-12-22 o 09:16, Mateusz Orzoł pisze: > > > > W dniu 2016-12-21 o 18:21, Khem Raj pisze: >> On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 10:54 PM, Mateusz Orzoł >> wrote: >>> W dniu 2016-12-20 o 10:46, Mateusz Orzoł pisze: >>> >>> >>> >>> W dniu 2016-12-20 o 00:43, Khem

Re: [yocto] [bitbake] Failure to compile UltraJson, LMDB and Netifaces python modules recipes for Krogoth.

W dniu 2016-12-21 o 18:21, Khem Raj pisze: > On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 10:54 PM, Mateusz Orzoł > wrote: >> >> W dniu 2016-12-20 o 10:46, Mateusz Orzoł pisze: >> >> >> >> W dniu 2016-12-20 o 00:43, Khem Raj pisze: >> >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 1:46 PM,

Re: [yocto] [bitbake] Failure to compile UltraJson, LMDB and Netifaces python modules recipes for Krogoth.

On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 10:54 PM, Mateusz Orzoł wrote: > > > W dniu 2016-12-20 o 10:46, Mateusz Orzoł pisze: > > > > W dniu 2016-12-20 o 00:43, Khem Raj pisze: > > > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Mateusz Orzoł > wrote:

Re: [yocto] [bitbake] Failure to compile UltraJson, LMDB and Netifaces python modules recipes for Krogoth.

W dniu 2016-12-20 o 10:46, Mateusz Orzoł pisze: > > > > W dniu 2016-12-20 o 00:43, Khem Raj pisze: >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Mateusz Orzoł >> > > wrote: >> >> Hi everyone, >> >> I am migrating

Re: [yocto] [bitbake] Failure to compile UltraJson, LMDB and Netifaces python modules recipes for Krogoth.

W dniu 2016-12-20 o 00:43, Khem Raj pisze: > > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Mateusz Orzoł > > wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I am migrating my old Yocto image from kernel 3.8 to 4.1 on the > Intel

Re: [yocto] [bitbake] Failure to compile UltraJson, LMDB and Netifaces python modules recipes for Krogoth.

On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Mateusz Orzoł < mateusz.or...@3cityelectronics.com> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I am migrating my old Yocto image from kernel 3.8 to 4.1 on the Intel > Quark based platform. After dealing with some SPI driver issues now I've > encountered some strange bitbake

[yocto] [bitbake] Failure to compile UltraJson, LMDB and Netifaces python modules recipes for Krogoth.

Hi everyone, I am migrating my old Yocto image from kernel 3.8 to 4.1 on the Intel Quark based platform. After dealing with some SPI driver issues now I've encountered some strange bitbake behaviour. My web application requires UltraJson , LMDB and Netifaces modules. After running bitbake I am

[yocto] Yocto Bitbake Failure

Hi I'm facing the following error. Not able to figure out what is the failure cause I'm I missing any specific steps. Please support do_rootfs Host OS and architecture - -Ubuntu SMP i686/ i386 GNU/Linux Target architecture/BSP - iMX6 Sabre / meta-fsl-arm The build image -

[yocto] bitbake failure on meta-cedartrail using master branch

FYI, I just pulled the lasted patches into my system and ran a bitbake of cedartrail with the PVR driver. I got a failure on the kernel build. log below: ERROR: Logfile of failure stored in:

Re: [yocto] bitbake failure on meta-cedartrail using master branch

On 05/23/2012 04:59 AM, jfabernathy wrote: FYI, I just pulled the lasted patches into my system and ran a bitbake of cedartrail with the PVR driver. I have a fix for this, was waiting for an Ack and got side tracked. Please pull meta-intel again and try again with the master branch. You

Re: [yocto] bitbake failure on meta-cedartrail using master branch

On 05/23/2012 02:24 PM, Darren Hart wrote: On 05/23/2012 04:59 AM, jfabernathy wrote: FYI, I just pulled the lasted patches into my system and ran a bitbake of cedartrail with the PVR driver. I have a fix for this, was waiting for an Ack and got side tracked. Please pull meta-intel again and