Re: [yocto] Hob implementation: vanilla or branded?

2012-06-11 Thread Barros Pena, Belen
Thanks, Joshua. Belen On 08/06/2012 17:41, Joshua Lock j...@linux.intel.com wrote: On 08/06/12 07:28, Barros Pena, Belen wrote: Vanilla 5 - branded 0 :) Shane, Dongxiao and Alex: from an implementation point of view, I guess this means eliminating any hardcoded UI-related values (button

Re: [yocto] Hob implementation: vanilla or branded?

2012-06-11 Thread Barros Pena, Belen
Sounds good: thanks, Ross. Belen On 08/06/2012 21:24, Burton, Ross ross.bur...@intel.com wrote: On 8 June 2012 17:41, Joshua Lock j...@linux.intel.com wrote: Joshua: if you have a rough idea of the things that will need to be changed from the work you did before the 1.2 release, please let

Re: [yocto] Hob implementation: vanilla or branded?

2012-06-08 Thread Barros Pena, Belen
Vanilla 5 - branded 0 :) Shane, Dongxiao and Alex: from an implementation point of view, I guess this means eliminating any hardcoded UI-related values (button colours and styles, for example). Joshua: if you have a rough idea of the things that will need to be changed from the work you did

Re: [yocto] Hob implementation: vanilla or branded?

2012-06-08 Thread Darren Hart
On 06/08/2012 07:28 AM, Barros Pena, Belen wrote: Vanilla 5 - branded 0 :) Shane, Dongxiao and Alex: from an implementation point of view, I guess this means eliminating any hardcoded UI-related values (button colours and styles, for example). GTK should be able to pull those colors and

Re: [yocto] Hob implementation: vanilla or branded?

2012-06-08 Thread Burton, Ross
On 8 June 2012 17:41, Joshua Lock j...@linux.intel.com wrote: Joshua: if you have a rough idea of the things that will need to be changed from the work you did before the 1.2 release, please let us know. I think it's fair that I take over from Joshua as resident GTK+ knowledge base, having

Re: [yocto] Hob implementation: vanilla or branded?

2012-06-08 Thread Joshua Lock
On 08/06/12 13:24, Burton, Ross wrote: On 8 June 2012 17:41, Joshua Lockj...@linux.intel.com wrote: Joshua: if you have a rough idea of the things that will need to be changed from the work you did before the 1.2 release, please let us know. I think it's fair that I take over from Joshua as

Re: [yocto] Hob implementation: vanilla or branded?

2012-06-08 Thread Burton, Ross
On 8 June 2012 21:26, Joshua Lock j...@linux.intel.com wrote: Even more importantly, being my go to guy for GTK+ lore! What you never knew is that I just asked Emmanuele your question. ;) Ross ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org

Re: [yocto] Hob implementation: vanilla or branded?

2012-06-08 Thread Stewart, David C
By the way, if there is no theme set, will the app use a reasonable default? ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Re: [yocto] Hob implementation: vanilla or branded?

2012-06-08 Thread Burton, Ross
On 8 June 2012 21:42, Stewart, David C david.c.stew...@intel.com wrote: By the way, if there is no theme set, will the app use a reasonable default? It's very hard to not have a theme set. In GNOME the default is Adwaita (GNOME 3) or Clearlooks (GNOME 2). Many reasonable distributions of KDE

[yocto] Hob implementation: vanilla or branded?

2012-05-31 Thread Barros Pena, Belen
Hi all, As part of the Hob work for the 1.3 release it looks like we need to make a visual design and implementation decision: do we want a 'vanilla' or a 'branded' look for Hob? Sorry if the choice of words is not the best. Neither 'vanilla' nor 'branded' are meant in any negative way. We did

Re: [yocto] Hob implementation: vanilla or branded?

2012-05-31 Thread Tomas Frydrych
Hi, On 31/05/12 17:55, Barros Pena, Belen wrote: I would like to know what the Yocto Project community thinks about these 2 approaches. Vanilla please, 'branded' applications are so 1990s. I think very few users care whether an application looks different on a different OS then their own, but

Re: [yocto] Hob implementation: vanilla or branded?

2012-05-31 Thread Jack Mitchell
On 31/05/2012 18:08, Tomas Frydrych wrote: Hi, On 31/05/12 17:55, Barros Pena, Belen wrote: I would like to know what the Yocto Project community thinks about these 2 approaches. Vanilla please, 'branded' applications are so 1990s. I think very few users care whether an application looks

Re: [yocto] Hob implementation: vanilla or branded?

2012-05-31 Thread Darren Hart
On 05/31/2012 09:55 AM, Barros Pena, Belen wrote: Hi all, As part of the Hob work for the 1.3 release it looks like we need to make a visual design and implementation decision: do we want a 'vanilla' or a 'branded' look for Hob? Sorry if the choice of words is not the best. Neither

Re: [yocto] Hob implementation: vanilla or branded?

2012-05-31 Thread McClintock Matthew-B29882
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Barros Pena, Belen belen.barros.p...@intel.com wrote: Hi all, As part of the Hob work for the 1.3 release it looks like we need to make a visual design and implementation decision: do we want a 'vanilla' or a 'branded' look for Hob? Sorry if the choice of

Re: [yocto] Hob implementation: vanilla or branded?

2012-05-31 Thread Burton, Ross
Hi Belen, On 31 May 2012 17:55, Barros Pena, Belen belen.barros.p...@intel.com wrote: As part of the Hob work for the 1.3 release it looks like we need to make a visual design and implementation decision: do we want a 'vanilla' or a 'branded' look for Hob? Sorry if the choice of words is not