Two months ago I never heard of Yocto -- now I are one. I'm
attempting to create a layer and pile of recipes that will allow us to
adapt Freescale's i.MX support to our custom board. Right now we're
starting out with one of their evaluation boards, but will eventually
transition to our own. In
On 08/15/2013 11:15 AM, Leo Schwab wrote:
Two months ago I never heard of Yocto -- now I are one. I'm
attempting to create a layer and pile of recipes that will allow us to
adapt Freescale's i.MX support to our custom board. Right now we're
starting out with one of their evaluation boards, but
Thank you for replying:
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Saul Wold s...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On 08/15/2013 11:15 AM, Leo Schwab wrote:
...Except I never told it to build 'ourboard'; I haven't modified
conf/machine/ourboard.conf yet. It should still be building
mx6dl_sabresd_config. So
On 08/15/2013 12:02 PM, Leo Schwab wrote:
Thank you for replying:
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Saul Wold s...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On 08/15/2013 11:15 AM, Leo Schwab wrote:
...Except I never told it to build 'ourboard'; I haven't modified
conf/machine/ourboard.conf yet. It should
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Saul Wold s...@linux.intel.com wrote:
What version of oe-core / bitbake are you working with?
Umm... Is 'dylan' a meaningful answer?
Sound likeyou are trying a clean build, you could just try bitbake -e
u-boot without doing a full build and check those two
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Leo Schwab lsch...@sensity.com wrote:
meta-belis3/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-imx_2009.08.bbappend):
FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := ${THISDIR}/${PN}:
SRC_URI_append_ourboard = file://u-boot-ourboard.patch
UBOOT_MACHINE_ourboard = mx6_ourboard_config
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Leo Schwab lsch...@sensity.com wrote:
Still not entirely clear why the results differ.
I still haven't figured out why those two runs are different, but I
think I see what I might have done wrong with the .bbappend file. Put
briefly: I copy-pasted Freescale's
