[yocto] Inadvertent RootFS permission pollution

2014-07-09 Thread Bollinger, Seth
Hello, I recently ran into a problem where I had trouble determining why the setgid bit was set in my rootfs. It turns out that debian has this bit set on /usr/local (where I was building from), and thus inherited this bit from that directory tree. This surprised me, so I thought I would pass

Re: [yocto] Inadvertent RootFS permission pollution

2014-07-09 Thread Christopher Larson
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Bollinger, Seth wrote: > I recently ran into a problem where I had trouble determining why the > setgid bit was set in my rootfs. It turns out that debian has this bit set > on /usr/local (where I was building from), and thus inherited this bit from > that directo

Re: [yocto] Inadvertent RootFS permission pollution

2014-07-09 Thread Saul Wold
On 07/09/2014 08:18 AM, Christopher Larson wrote: On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Bollinger, Seth wrote: I recently ran into a problem where I had trouble determining why the setgid bit was set in my rootfs. It turns out that debian has this bit set on /usr/local (where I was building from),

Re: [yocto] Inadvertent RootFS permission pollution

2014-07-09 Thread Bollinger, Seth
On 7/9/14, 11:46 AM, "Saul Wold" wrote: >On 07/09/2014 08:18 AM, Christopher Larson wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Bollinger, Seth >> >> wrote: >> >>> I recently ran into a problem where I had trouble determining why the >>> setgid bit was set in my rootfs. It turns out that debian