Why does the meta/conf/machine/mpc8315e-rdb.conf list TARGET_FPU as SPE. This
isn't correct for an MPC8313 SoC.
- k
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 00:46 -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
> Why does the meta/conf/machine/mpc8315e-rdb.conf list TARGET_FPU as
> SPE. This isn't correct for an MPC8313 SoC.
I'm not familiar with that machine, please could you file a bug, maybe
with a patch showing what the correct values should be?
On 10-11-10 01:46 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
Why does the meta/conf/machine/mpc8315e-rdb.conf list TARGET_FPU as SPE. This
isn't correct for an MPC8313 SoC.
It isn't used at the moment, so we can safely
ignore this.
It was a hold over from when I initially created
the BSP, and I've since changed
On 10-11-10 08:38 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 10-11-10 01:46 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
Why does the meta/conf/machine/mpc8315e-rdb.conf list TARGET_FPU as
SPE. This isn't correct for an MPC8313 SoC.
It isn't used at the moment, so we can safely
ignore this.
It was a hold over from when I initial
On Nov 10, 2010, at 7:58 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On 10-11-10 08:38 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>> On 10-11-10 01:46 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>> Why does the meta/conf/machine/mpc8315e-rdb.conf list TARGET_FPU as
>>> SPE. This isn't correct for an MPC8313 SoC.
>>
>> It isn't used at the moment, s
On 10-11-10 09:11 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Nov 10, 2010, at 7:58 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 10-11-10 08:38 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 10-11-10 01:46 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
Why does the meta/conf/machine/mpc8315e-rdb.conf list TARGET_FPU as
SPE. This isn't correct for an MPC8313 SoC.
It
On Nov 10, 2010, at 8:23 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On 10-11-10 09:11 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>
>> On Nov 10, 2010, at 7:58 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>>
>>> On 10-11-10 08:38 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 10-11-10 01:46 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
> Why does the meta/conf/machine/mpc8315e-rdb
On 10-11-10 10:03 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Nov 10, 2010, at 8:23 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 10-11-10 09:11 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Nov 10, 2010, at 7:58 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 10-11-10 08:38 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 10-11-10 01:46 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
Why does the meta/conf
