This is more likely to work:
bitbake-layers show-recipes gcc
Cheers,
Paul
On Wed, 12 Oct 2016 21:19:59 Sandeep G.R wrote:
> Hi Vijay,
>
> You can run *"bitbake-layers show-recipes | grep gcc-source"* to know more
> on supported toolchain versions.
>
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Vijaya
Hi Vijay,
You can run *"bitbake-layers show-recipes | grep gcc-source"* to know more
on supported toolchain versions.
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Vijayakumar Badiger <
vijayakuma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Paul, appreciate your reply.
>
> Cheers,
> Vijay
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 6:
Thanks Paul, appreciate your reply.
Cheers,
Vijay
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 6:24 PM, Paul Eggleton <
paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> Hi Vijay,
>
> On Mon, 10 Oct 2016 17:44:13 Vijayakumar Badiger wrote:
> > Please can some one tell me the tool chain versions supported on the
> latest
> >
Hi Vijay,
On Mon, 10 Oct 2016 17:44:13 Vijayakumar Badiger wrote:
> Please can some one tell me the tool chain versions supported on the latest
> YPCore-Krogoth.
> I know the it uses default GCC5.3, just wanted to know if older tool chain
> like 4.9XX is supported or not.
>
> I don't see the feat
Hello All,
Please can some one tell me the tool chain versions supported on the latest
YPCore-Krogoth.
I know the it uses default GCC5.3, just wanted to know if older tool chain
like 4.9XX is supported or not.
I don't see the feature list like the one listed below for Krogoth 2.1.1.
which clearly
On 9 October 2013 06:45, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> (for example, i would assume
> that, in any current distro, git would certainly be safe, no?)
The safety of a utility is only one consideration, feature-set is another.
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoc
Hi Robert,
On Wednesday 09 October 2013 06:45:36 Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> (aside: prepping to teach an OE/yocto course in a couple weeks,
> going thru the docs again, so be prepared for questions, some of them
> potentially silly but all in aid of clarifying bits of documentation.
> i'm sure sc
(aside: prepping to teach an OE/yocto course in a couple weeks,
going thru the docs again, so be prepared for questions, some of them
potentially silly but all in aid of clarifying bits of documentation.
i'm sure scott rifenbark is currently steeling himself for the
experience. :-)
i'm intima
On Sat, 20 Apr 2013, Tom Zanussi wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-04-20 at 05:35 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > i was just looking for an example of the kind of hierarchical
> > layer structure you find in meta-intel. is there another layer
> > that has that kind of structure?
> >
>
> A quick scan of
On Sat, 2013-04-20 at 05:35 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Apr 2013, Tom Zanussi wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 08:37 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >
> > > second, the BBLAYERS example there seems overly complicated and
> > > potentially confusing to beginners. the fact that
On Fri, 19 Apr 2013, Tom Zanussi wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 08:37 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> > second, the BBLAYERS example there seems overly complicated and
> > potentially confusing to beginners. the fact that meta-yocto is listed
> > as NON_REMOVABLE might make readers wonder how
On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 08:37 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> from section 1.1 of BSP developers guide:
>
> http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/latest/bsp-guide/bsp-guide.html#bsp-layers
>
> first, it's not actually *required* that a layer name start with the
> prefix "meta-", is it? pretty sure it'
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 8:37 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> first, it's not actually *required* that a layer name start with the
> prefix "meta-", is it? pretty sure it's not and, if it isn't, that
> should be made abundantly clear. it's fine to point out that it's a
> well-established convention
from section 1.1 of BSP developers guide:
http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/latest/bsp-guide/bsp-guide.html#bsp-layers
first, it's not actually *required* that a layer name start with the
prefix "meta-", is it? pretty sure it's not and, if it isn't, that
should be made abundantly clear. it's f
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:05 PM, Sreekanth Nandakumar
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> As I am new to yocto can you clarify the following things.
>
>
>
> We have our own kernel code(v 2.6.38) placed in local directory
> /home/administrator/testing/kernel) . I have written recipe for it.
>
would you show it
Hi,
As I am new to yocto can you clarify the following things.
We have our own kernel code(v 2.6.38) placed in local directory
/home/administrator/testing/kernel) . I have written recipe for it.
We have Makefile to build the kernel. Will bitbake identify the Makefile &
start building or
16 matches
Mail list logo
