On Sat, 20 Apr 2013, Tom Zanussi wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-04-20 at 05:35 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > i was just looking for an example of the kind of hierarchical
> > layer structure you find in meta-intel. is there another layer
> > that has that kind of structure?
> >
>
> A quick scan of
On Sat, 2013-04-20 at 05:35 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Apr 2013, Tom Zanussi wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 08:37 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >
> > > second, the BBLAYERS example there seems overly complicated and
> > > potentially confusing to beginners. the fact that
On Fri, 19 Apr 2013, Tom Zanussi wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 08:37 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> > second, the BBLAYERS example there seems overly complicated and
> > potentially confusing to beginners. the fact that meta-yocto is listed
> > as NON_REMOVABLE might make readers wonder how
On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 08:37 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> from section 1.1 of BSP developers guide:
>
> http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/latest/bsp-guide/bsp-guide.html#bsp-layers
>
> first, it's not actually *required* that a layer name start with the
> prefix "meta-", is it? pretty sure it'
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 8:37 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> first, it's not actually *required* that a layer name start with the
> prefix "meta-", is it? pretty sure it's not and, if it isn't, that
> should be made abundantly clear. it's fine to point out that it's a
> well-established convention
from section 1.1 of BSP developers guide:
http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/latest/bsp-guide/bsp-guide.html#bsp-layers
first, it's not actually *required* that a layer name start with the
prefix "meta-", is it? pretty sure it's not and, if it isn't, that
should be made abundantly clear. it's f
