[yocto] (no subject)

2011-06-14 Thread Bruce Ashfield
Tom/Darren/Saul, Not sure who wants to proxy these into meta-intel for me, so I've copied you all. Now that the recipe renames for linux-yocto in the main repos, meta-intel needs to be updated as well. Patch 2 is for meta-yocto with the same change. These are the referenes that I found (hopeful

[yocto] [PATCH] meta-yocto/linux-yocto: update to match the renamed linux-yocto recipes

2011-06-14 Thread Bruce Ashfield
The linux-yocto recipes have been renamed to include explicit version numbers. The meta-yocto bbappends must be updated to follow the new naming convention. Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield --- .../linux/linux-yocto-stable_git.bbappend | 12 .../linux/linux-yocto_2.6.34

[yocto] [PATCH v3] meta-yocto/meta-intel: linux-yocto recipe renames

2011-06-14 Thread Bruce Ashfield
hange. These are the references that I found (hopefully I didn't miss any) and fixed to the new naming convention. Note: I still can't push to meta-intel-contrib, so I'm just sending this as a patch. Cheers, Bruce Bruce Ashfield (1): meta-intel/linux-yocto:

[yocto] [PATCH] meta-intel/linux-yocto: update to match the renamed linux-yocto recipes

2011-06-14 Thread Bruce Ashfield
bbappend file. This allows the 2.6.34 and 2.6.37 SRCREVs to co-exist. Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield --- meta-crownbay/conf/machine/crownbay-noemgd.conf|6 -- meta-crownbay/conf/machine/crownbay.conf |8 +--- .../linux/linux-yocto-stable_git.bbappend |9

[yocto] [PATCH] meta-yocto/linux-yocto: update to match the renamed linux-yocto recipes

2011-06-14 Thread Bruce Ashfield
The linux-yocto recipes have been renamed to include explicit version numbers. The meta-yocto bbappends must be updated to follow the new naming convention. Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield --- .../linux/linux-yocto-stable_git.bbappend | 12 .../linux/linux-yocto_2.6.34

Re: [yocto] [PATCH] meta-intel/linux-yocto: update to match the renamed linux-yocto recipes

2011-06-14 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 11-06-14 8:04 PM, Darren Hart wrote: On 06/14/2011 01:47 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: The linux-yocto recipes have been renamed to include explicit version numbers. The meta-intel bbappends must be updated to follow the new naming convention. As a consequence of the recipe renames any SRCREV

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/1] Enable to set RTC for beagleboard

2011-06-15 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 06/15/11 06:41, Jingdong Lu wrote: From: Jingdong Lu Ensure msecure is mux'd to be able to set the RTC for beagleboard. Fixes bug [YOCTO #767] Jingdong, The fix looks reasonable to me, Darren has been refreshing the beagleboard support as well, so I've cc'd him here to see if we have this

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/1] Enable to set RTC for beagleboard

2011-06-15 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 06/15/11 09:25, Koen Kooi wrote: Op 15 jun 2011, om 15:21 heeft Bruce Ashfield het volgende geschreven: On 06/15/11 06:41, Jingdong Lu wrote: From: Jingdong Lu Ensure msecure is mux'd to be able to set the RTC for beagleboard. Fixes bug [YOCTO #767] Jingdong, The fix looks reaso

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/1] Enable to set RTC for beagleboard

2011-06-15 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 06/15/11 12:48, Darren Hart wrote: On 06/15/2011 06:31 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 06/15/11 09:25, Koen Kooi wrote: Op 15 jun 2011, om 15:21 heeft Bruce Ashfield het volgende geschreven: On 06/15/11 06:41, Jingdong Lu wrote: From: Jingdong Lu Ensure msecure is mux'd to be ab

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/1] Enable to set RTC for beagleboard

2011-06-15 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 11-06-15 10:23 PM, Lu Jingdong wrote: On 06/16/2011 01:33 AM, Darren Hart wrote: On 06/15/2011 09:52 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 06/15/11 12:48, Darren Hart wrote: On 06/15/2011 06:31 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 06/15/11 09:25, Koen Kooi wrote: Op 15 jun 2011, om 15:21 heeft Bruce

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 1/1] RTC: Ensure msecure is mux'd to be able to set RTC

2011-06-16 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 06/16/11 02:13, Liming Wang wrote: On 2011-6-16 14:07, Jingdong Lu wrote: From: Jingdong Lu commit e2a346a2a054f702fd76f328ff747b9ad9264a4c from git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tmlind/linux-omap-2.6.git It's fine if you break this line into two lines. arm: omap3: beagle: Ensu

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 1/1] RTC: Ensure msecure is mux'd to be able to set RTC

2011-06-16 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 06/16/11 03:27, Koen Kooi wrote: Op 16 jun 2011, om 08:07 heeft Jingdong Lu het volgende geschreven: From: Jingdong Lu commit e2a346a2a054f702fd76f328ff747b9ad9264a4c from git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tmlind/linux-omap-2.6.git When I do 'git show e2a346a2a054f702fd76f32

Re: [yocto] [KERNEL][PATCH] add utrace

2011-06-16 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 06/13/11 10:35, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote: From: Tom Zanussi This adds support for utrace to linux-yocto, for userspace tracing in systemtap. Please pull into the yocto/base branch linux-yocto. Pull URL: git://git.pokylinux.org/linux-yocto-2.6.37-contrib Branch: tzanussi/yocto/base-utr

[yocto] [PATCH 0/1] linux-yocto/meta-yocto: bump SRCREVs for utrace

2011-06-16 Thread Bruce Ashfield
available in the git repository at: git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib zedd/kernel http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=zedd/kernel Bruce Ashfield (1): linux-yocto/meta-yocto: update SRCREVs for utrace merge .../linux/linux-yocto_2.6.37.bbappend | 10

[yocto] [PATCH 2/2] linux-yocto/meta-yocto: update SRCREVs for utrace merge

2011-06-16 Thread Bruce Ashfield
Updating the SRCREVs to account for the merge of utrace to support systemtap. Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield --- .../linux/linux-yocto_2.6.37.bbappend | 10 +- 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta-yocto/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_2.6.37

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/1] arm: omap3: beagle: Ensure msecure is mux'd to be able to set the RTC

2011-06-17 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 06/16/11 23:26, Jingdong Lu wrote: From: Jingdong Lu arm: omap3: beagle: Ensure msecure is mux'd to be able to set the RTC Fixes bug [YOCTO #767] Thanks Jindong, We'll make sure that this gets into the tree, either via Darren's beagleboard update, or as an individual commit. Cheers, Bruc

Re: [yocto] [PULL][linux-yocto] beagleboard: sync with meta-ti linux-omap_2.6.37

2011-06-18 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 11-06-18 11:13 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: Op 18 jun 2011, om 17:10 heeft Koen Kooi het volgende geschreven: Op 18 jun 2011, om 17:08 heeft Darren Hart het volgende geschreven: On 06/18/2011 01:11 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: Op 18 jun 2011, om 01:18 heeft Darren Hart het volgende geschreven: Fro

Re: [yocto] [PULL][linux-yocto] beagleboard: sync with meta-ti linux-omap_2.6.37

2011-06-20 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 06/18/11 12:32, Koen Kooi wrote: Op 18 jun 2011, om 18:09 heeft Bruce Ashfield het volgende geschreven: On 11-06-18 11:13 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: Op 18 jun 2011, om 17:10 heeft Koen Kooi het volgende geschreven: Op 18 jun 2011, om 17:08 heeft Darren Hart het volgende geschreven: On

Re: [yocto] [PATCH RESEND 0/1][linux-yocto] beagleboard: align config with with meta-ti linux-omap

2011-06-21 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 06/21/11 03:17, Darren Hart wrote: From: Darren Hart Update the Beagleboard meta data to align with the meta-ti linux-omap_2.6.37 recipe defconfig while preserving the policy configuration from linux-yocto. Core platform bits were maintained, while things like filesystems and very generic dri

Re: [yocto] [PATCH v2 0/3] beagleboard: machine conf, xorg, audio mixer

2011-06-21 Thread Bruce Ashfield
it ensures the beagleboard boots with sane mixer defaults. Also, switch to the xf86-lite xserver from kdrive. This keeps the Yocto Project BSP more inline with the meta-texasinstruments BSP, and eliminates some trouble with keyboard handling present with the kdrive server. Acked-by: Bruce Ashfield

[yocto] [PATCH 1/1] linux-yocto/meta-yocto: update yocto/standard and beagleboard SRCREVs

2011-06-22 Thread Bruce Ashfield
tream sources. Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield --- .../linux/linux-yocto_2.6.37.bbappend | 10 +- 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta-yocto/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_2.6.37.bbappend b/meta-yocto/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_2.6.37.bba

[yocto] [PATCH 0/1] meta-yocto/linux-yocto: BSP SRCREV updates

2011-06-22 Thread Bruce Ashfield
ommit 3d6054040479ae77c7de24721ff822c1b09291c6: Bruce Ashfield (1): linux-yocto: update meta and yocto/standard SRCREVs are available in the git repository at: git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib zedd/kernel http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=zedd/kernel Bruce Ashfie

Re: [yocto] the mpc8315's compile option

2011-06-22 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 11-06-22 9:55 PM, NiQingliang wrote: mpc8315's core is e300c3, why use "tune-ppc603e.inc"? The 603e represented a lowest common denominator tune file when the BSP was introduced, and it was available in poky at the time. We simply haven't revisited the tuning for the BSP yet, since what we

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 1/1] routerstationpro: IPC config

2011-06-24 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 06/24/11 03:02, Jingdong Lu wrote: From: Jingdong Lu Add IPC config for routestationpro Signed-off-by: Jingdong Lu --- .../bsp/routerstationpro/routerstationpro.cfg | 10 +++--- 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/routerstati

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 1/1] routerstationpro: IPC config

2011-06-24 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 06/24/11 02:34, Jingdong Lu wrote: From: Jingdong Lu Add IPC config for routestationpro I replied to what looked to be v2 of this change, so am dropping this patch. If they were indeed different, you'll need to point me at what I missed. Also: I got direct email for all these, and a copy s

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 1/1] routerstationpro: IPC config

2011-06-28 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 06/28/11 05:44, Lu Jingdong wrote: On 06/24/2011 09:55 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 06/24/11 03:02, Jingdong Lu wrote: From: Jingdong Lu Add IPC config for routestationpro Signed-off-by: Jingdong Lu --- .../bsp/routerstationpro/routerstationpro.cfg | 10 +++--- 1 files changed, 7

Re: [yocto] [PATCH][poky-extras] meta-kernel-dev: allow for dangling bbappend files

2011-07-11 Thread Bruce Ashfield
BB_DANGLINGAPPENDS_WARNONLY. Signed-off-by: Darren Hart CC: Bruce Ashfield Agreed. This is the right solution. Acked-by: Bruce Ashfield CC: Jeff Mitchell --- meta-kernel-dev/conf/layer.conf |4 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta-kernel-dev/conf

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/1]meta/routerstationpro: remove some conflicted configurations

2011-07-12 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 07/12/11 16:18, Saul Wold wrote: On 07/11/2011 05:22 PM, Jingdong Lu wrote: From: Jingdong Lu Some kernel options were redefined by routerstationpro.cfg and it will cause some bugs. So remove some configurations which have been defined in base.cfg or standard.cfg from routerstationpro.cfg.

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/3][KERNEL] linux-yocto-dev meta updates

2011-07-12 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 11-07-10 12:25 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote: From: Tom Zanussi This patchset adds a new eg20t feature to linux-yocto-dev, and makes crownbay use it. It also adds the initial BSP infrastructure for a new BSP, Fish River Island II, which also uses the new feature. Please pull the following

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/2][KERNEL] Add and use iwlagn and mac80211 features

2011-07-12 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 11-07-12 7:25 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote: From: Tom Zanussi This patchset adds a couple new features, iwlagn and mac80211 for the fri2 BSP. Please pull into linux-yocto-dev. Pull URL: git://git.yoctoproject.org/linux-yocto-2.6.37-contrib Branch: tzanussi/linux-3.0/meta/iwlagn Bro

Re: [yocto] IMAGE_FSTYPES that are supported?

2011-07-14 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 07/14/11 09:05, Kumar Gala wrote: Is there a list of which IMAGE_FSTYPES are supported. I didn't see anything in the docs. Looking to see if a u-boot 'mkimage' wrapped set of images is supported or not. I'm not 100% where the list is, but I can confirm that uImages are supported and work

Re: [yocto] IMAGE_FSTYPES that are supported?

2011-07-14 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 07/14/11 09:40, Koen Kooi wrote: Op 14 jul 2011, om 15:13 heeft Bruce Ashfield het volgende geschreven: On 07/14/11 09:05, Kumar Gala wrote: Is there a list of which IMAGE_FSTYPES are supported. I didn't see anything in the docs. Looking to see if a u-boot 'mkimage'

Re: [yocto] IMAGE_FSTYPES that are supported?

2011-07-14 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 07/14/11 12:21, Koen Kooi wrote: Op 14 jul 2011, om 18:20 heeft Kumar Gala het volgende geschreven: On Jul 14, 2011, at 8:56 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 07/14/11 09:40, Koen Kooi wrote: Op 14 jul 2011, om 15:13 heeft Bruce Ashfield het volgende geschreven: On 07/14/11 09:05, Kumar

Re: [yocto] IMAGE_FSTYPES that are supported?

2011-07-14 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 07/14/11 12:34, Kumar Gala wrote: On Jul 14, 2011, at 11:24 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 07/14/11 12:21, Koen Kooi wrote: Op 14 jul 2011, om 18:20 heeft Kumar Gala het volgende geschreven: On Jul 14, 2011, at 8:56 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 07/14/11 09:40, Koen Kooi wrote: Op 14

Re: [yocto] toolchain queries

2011-07-14 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 11-07-14 10:36 PM, Kumar Gala wrote: Where is the best place to ask questions and try and get support for adding some toolchain variations in? Here can work, or the oe-core lists. I'm wanting to add support in for a few different flavors of PPC that are not currently supported: * e500v

[yocto] [PATCH 0/1] linux-yocto/meta: update SRCREVs

2011-07-14 Thread Bruce Ashfield
rnel-yocto http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=zedd/kernel Bruce Ashfield (1): linux-yocto/meta-yocto: update SRCREVS .../linux/linux-yocto_2.6.37.bbappend | 10 +- 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) -

[yocto] [PATCH 1/1] linux-yocto/meta-yocto: update SRCREVS

2011-07-14 Thread Bruce Ashfield
15:27:44 2011 -0700 mm: use alloc_bootmem_node_nopanic() on really needed path commit 8f389a99b652aab5b42297280bd94d95933ad12f upstream. Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield --- .../linux/linux-yocto_2.6.37.bbappend | 10 +- 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions

Re: [yocto] [PATCH] mpc8315e-rdb: Set TARGET_FPU correct

2011-07-14 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 11-07-15 12:56 AM, Kumar Gala wrote: The MPC8315E has a e300c3 core in it with 'classic' or normal PPC floating point. 'SPE' floating point is what exists on the e500v2 core. Acked-by: Bruce Ashfield Been meaning to change this for a while, the good news, is that the

Re: [yocto] [PATCH] mpc8315e-rdb: Set TARGET_FPU correct

2011-07-15 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 07/15/11 08:29, Kumar Gala wrote: On Jul 15, 2011, at 12:31 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 11-07-15 12:56 AM, Kumar Gala wrote: The MPC8315E has a e300c3 core in it with 'classic' or normal PPC floating point. 'SPE' floating point is what exists on the e500v2 cor

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/1][linux-yocto] Fix boot failure with less than 17 MB RAM

2011-07-15 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 07/14/11 18:27, Darren Hart wrote: From: Darren Hart The following patch from mainline addresses an issues that prevented my qemu testing from booting in less than 17M of memory. With this page, the kernel can boot to init in 8M of memory. Apply to yocto/standard/base The following changes

Re: [yocto] Additional / new BSP collection?

2011-07-27 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 07/27/11 08:40, Kumar Gala wrote: On Jul 27, 2011, at 3:45 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 00:21 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: Who is the best person to ask about adding new BSPs into yocto. What I mean by this is having a meta layer hosted on git.yoctoproject.org like meta-int

Re: [yocto] Additional / new BSP collection?

2011-07-27 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 07/27/11 10:23, Richard Purdie wrote: On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 08:55 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: Hi Kumar, As you know, I've been working on several kernel efforts around the FSL parts as well (in particular the ones that have enough pieces upstream to work out of the box). I definitely don't wan

Re: [yocto] BSP in meta layer vs poky

2011-07-27 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 07/27/11 10:23, Kumar Gala wrote: I was wondering what distinction qualified for a BSP existing in a meta layer vs in poky directly. For FSL PPC we currently have MPC8315-RDB in poky. Ideally we'd have one BSP for each major flavor [ associated with a unique compiler / libc target ]. Thi

Re: [yocto] [PATCH][linux-yocto-3.0] drivers/misc/pch_phub.c: don't oops if dmi_get_system_info returns NULL

2011-07-28 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 11-07-28 7:51 PM, Darren Hart wrote: Bruce, Please apply to yocto/base. Fixes a boot issue for a tunnel creek development board. I fetched and updated master in linux-yocto-3.0 and cherry picked this into yocto/base, and merged it out. e6625fa..55f9c40 master -> master 935b896..c33f

Re: [yocto] crownbay-noemgd poky-image-minimal fails to build

2011-07-29 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 07/29/11 06:05, Andre Haupt wrote: On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 09:23:59AM +0200, Andre Haupt wrote: Hi all, I am trying to build a poky bernard image for crownbay-noemgd. For this i checked out the bernard branch of both poky and meta-intel from git.yoctoproject.org. Bitbake fails during the ke

Re: [yocto] crownbay-noemgd poky-image-minimal fails to build

2011-07-29 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 07/29/11 09:57, Malcolm Crossley wrote: On 29/07/2011 14:12, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 07/29/11 06:05, Andre Haupt wrote: On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 09:23:59AM +0200, Andre Haupt wrote: Hi all, I am trying to build a poky bernard image for crownbay-noemgd. For this i checked out the bernard

Re: [yocto] crownbay-noemgd poky-image-minimal fails to build

2011-07-29 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 07/29/11 10:03, Andre Haupt wrote: Hi Bruce, thanks for your comments. See below On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 09:12:22AM -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: I'm trying to dust off my memory here. I know that this has been seen, and I also know that this built fine in the bernard release. The

Re: [yocto] crownbay-noemgd poky-image-minimal fails to build

2011-07-29 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 07/29/11 10:09, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 07/29/11 10:03, Andre Haupt wrote: Hi Bruce, thanks for your comments. See below On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 09:12:22AM -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: I'm trying to dust off my memory here. I know that this has been seen, and I also know that this

Re: [yocto] crownbay-noemgd poky-image-minimal fails to build

2011-07-29 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 07/29/11 10:11, Malcolm Crossley wrote: On 29/07/2011 15:02, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 07/29/11 09:57, Malcolm Crossley wrote: On 29/07/2011 14:12, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 07/29/11 06:05, Andre Haupt wrote: On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 09:23:59AM +0200, Andre Haupt wrote: Hi all, I am trying

Re: [yocto] crownbay-noemgd poky-image-minimal fails to build

2011-07-29 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 07/29/11 10:51, Malcolm Crossley wrote: On 29/07/2011 15:33, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 07/29/11 10:11, Malcolm Crossley wrote: On 29/07/2011 15:02, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 07/29/11 09:57, Malcolm Crossley wrote: On 29/07/2011 14:12, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 07/29/11 06:05, Andre Haupt

Re: [yocto] [PATCH][linux-yocto-3.0] drivers/misc/pch_phub.c: don't oops if dmi_get_system_info returns NULL

2011-07-30 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 11-07-30 2:34 PM, Khem Raj wrote: On Thursday, July 28, 2011 04:51:41 PM Darren Hart wrote: Bruce, Please apply to yocto/base. Fixes a boot issue for a tunnel creek development board. -- commit 2b934c6236983392d01bef22e43af3051cac16f5 If dmi_get_system_info() returns NULL, pch_phub_probe(

Re: [yocto] kernel panic - not syncing: No init found

2011-07-31 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 11-07-31 3:44 PM, Francis Meyvis wrote: Hello, I probably miss something trivial. I cloned the git://git.yoctoproject.org/poky.git I build on a 64 bit machine a qemux86-64 (. ./oe-init-build-env qemux86-64 and changing the conf/local.conf) I build the core-image-sato& core-image-minimal. The

Re: [yocto] kernel panic - not syncing: No init found

2011-07-31 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 11-07-31 11:30 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote: On Sun, 2011-07-31 at 19:42 -0700, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 11-07-31 3:44 PM, Francis Meyvis wrote: Hello, I probably miss something trivial. I cloned the git://git.yoctoproject.org/poky.git I build on a 64 bit machine a qemux86-64 (. ./oe-init-build

Re: [yocto] kernel panic - not syncing: No init found

2011-08-02 Thread Bruce Ashfield
either this is something transient, or unique to your setup at the moment. Bruce Groetjes, Francis On Aug 1, 2011 6:04 AM, "Bruce Ashfield" mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com>> wrote: > On 11-07-31 11:30 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote: >> On Sun, 2011-07-31 at 19:42 -0700, Bruc

Re: [yocto] Use of git.pokylinux.org vs git.yoctoproject.org in kernel recipe.

2011-08-05 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 11-08-05 08:50 AM, Kumar Gala wrote: In the linux-yocto_3.0.bb recipe we have: meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_3.0.bb:SRC_URI = "git://git.pokylinux.org/linux-yocto-3.0;protocol=git;nocheckout=1;branch=${KBRANCH},meta;name=machine,meta" Should this really be git.yoctoproject.org? Ye

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/1] meta/pandaboard: add pandaboard bsp

2011-08-05 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 11-08-05 01:34 PM, Khem Raj wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/04/2011 10:58 PM, jingdong...@windriver.com wrote: From: Jingdong Lu Add pandaboard bsp why not use meta-ti ? I'm hoping to not repeat all the discussions that we've had around the beagle board here.

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/1] meta/pandaboard: add pandaboard bsp

2011-08-05 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 11-08-05 01:55 PM, Philip Balister wrote: On 08/05/2011 01:38 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 11-08-05 01:34 PM, Khem Raj wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/04/2011 10:58 PM, jingdong...@windriver.com wrote: From: Jingdong Lu Add pandaboard bsp why not use meta-ti

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/1] meta/pandaboard: add pandaboard bsp

2011-08-06 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 11-08-05 2:10 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 11-08-05 01:55 PM, Philip Balister wrote: On 08/05/2011 01:38 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 11-08-05 01:34 PM, Khem Raj wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/04/2011 10:58 PM, jingdong...@windriver.com wrote: From: Jingdong

Re: [yocto] linux-yocto_3.0: pull powerpc compile fix for -0s in BOOTFLAGS

2011-08-09 Thread Bruce Ashfield
mit f6a70a6408a5d173d69fe3dc26fdaece38b4be3c Author: Bruce Ashfield Date: Thu Oct 14 16:38:00 2010 -0400 powerpc/boot: remove -Os from BOOTFLAGS Some variants of gcc 4.5 have issues with -Os and will throw: cc1: error: Do not use -Os option if --enable-target-optspace is not

Re: [yocto] linux-yocto_3.0: pull powerpc compile fix for -0s in BOOTFLAGS

2011-08-09 Thread Bruce Ashfield
: Bruce Ashfield Date: Thu Oct 14 16:38:00 2010 -0400 powerpc/boot: remove -Os from BOOTFLAGS Thanks, Before we do this I have a query about default toolchain? I just posted a patch that should make this NOT needed if we utilize gcc-4.6 So wondering what the feeling was about a fix to

Re: [yocto] linux-yocto_3.0: pull powerpc compile fix for -0s in BOOTFLAGS

2011-08-10 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 11-08-10 02:21 AM, Darren Hart wrote: On 08/09/2011 09:26 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 11-08-10 12:18 AM, Darren Hart wrote: Bruce, The following patch is needed for qemuppc and fsl-mpc8315e-rdb (same reasons as before). Can you pull this in from the 2.6.37 yocto tree? It should

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/1][linux-yocto-3.0:routerstationpro] gpio Kconfig fix

2011-08-11 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 11-08-11 04:22 AM, Darren Hart wrote: The following fix addresses a superfluous endif introduced by the patch adding the gpio support for the nxp_74hc153. Applies to yocto/standard/routerstationpro. A patch is included in my meta series to update the routerstationpro.scc with this patch. The

Re: [yocto] [linux-yocto][PATCH] MIPS: ARC: Fix build of firmware library on

2011-08-11 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 11-08-11 03:25 AM, Darren Hart wrote: commit 4f55fd752fb4770a354dd2401d5043c98236cc29 upstream Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle [applied to linux-yocto standard/base] Merged. Will be part of the pull request I'm preparing now. Bruce Signed-off-by: Darren Hart --- arch/mips/include/asm/sm

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 00/17][linux-yocto-3.0:meta] preempt-rt update (3.0.1-rt8 scc's)

2011-08-11 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 11-08-11 04:23 AM, Darren Hart wrote: The following series adds the necessary scc files in support of preempt-rt for the following machines. These have all been build tested, issues are noted below. A handful have been boot tested, also noted. sugarbay common-pc (boots)

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 02/17] meta/rt: beagleboard preempt-rt support

2011-08-11 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 11-08-11 04:27 AM, Darren Hart wrote: On 08/11/2011 01:23 AM, Darren Hart wrote: Oh the hypocrisy! For those of you that have caught my lack of detailed commentary for all the added preempt-rt .scc files - you are completely justified. I intended to paste a blurb for each and forgot by the ti

Re: [yocto] bbappend - Where should my file be?

2011-08-11 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 11-08-11 7:57 PM, Scott Garman wrote: On 08/11/2011 04:51 PM, Chris Tapp wrote: I've got a linux-wrs_git.bbappend file in a layer (under poky laverne 4.0.1) that contains: COMPATIBLE_MACHINE_Vortex86DX = "Vortex86DX" WRMACHINE_Vortex86DX = "common_pc" FILESEXTRAPATHS := "${THISDIR}/${PN}"

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/2] preempt-rt support for meta-yocto BSPs

2011-08-11 Thread Bruce Ashfield
for virtual/kernel override meta-yocto: add linux-yocto-rt support for all meta-yocto machines Acked-by: Bruce Ashfield meta-yocto/conf/machine/mpc8315e-rdb.conf |2 +- meta-yocto/conf/machine/routerstationpro.conf |2 +- .../linux/linux-yocto-rt_3.0.bbappend

Re: [yocto] bbappend - Where should my file be?

2011-08-12 Thread Bruce Ashfield
6446087a42b3b_0+0431115c9d720fee5bb105f6a7411efb4f851d26-r12/ That does look right! I suspect I've got something configured wrong with the new layer, but... On 12 Aug 2011, at 01:28, Bruce Ashfield wrote: I believe also meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux/defconfig should also work. Yep, bitbake is telling us wher

Re: [yocto] Configuring a layer to support multiple targets

2011-08-12 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 11-08-12 06:31 PM, Chris Tapp wrote: What is the best way to configure a layer to support multiple targets that share a common base? For example, a set of targets that use the Vortex86DX SOC share common peripherals and also have per-variant peripherals. I was thinking: 1) Have a conf/machi

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/3][KERNEL] yocto/emgd: add emgd 1.8

2011-08-15 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 11-08-12 03:32 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote: From: Tom Zanussi This patchset adds emgd 1.8 to yocto/emgd. Please pull into linux-yocto-3.0/yocto/emgd. Ack'd. Merging now, this will show up in todays update. Bruce Thanks, Tom The following changes are available in the git repositor

Re: [yocto] [PATCH][KERNEL] meta/crownbay: use hpet

2011-08-15 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 11-08-12 03:33 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote: From: Tom Zanussi This enables hpet for crownbay. Please pull into linux-yocto-3.0/meta. Ackd'. Merging and rolling this into todays build tests/update. Bruce Thanks, Tom The following changes are available in the git repository at:

Re: [yocto] Configuring a layer to support multiple targets

2011-08-17 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 11-08-17 03:59 AM, Chris Tapp wrote: On 13 Aug 2011, at 02:22, Bruce Ashfield wrote: What's your yocto release / base kernel ? IF you happen to be using linux-yocto there are several ways to avoid using defconfigs at all, and share your common base of kernel configuration items. Pl

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/2][KERNEL] meta-/fri2: add EMGD support

2011-08-17 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 11-08-17 12:50 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote: From: Tom Zanussi This patchset makes fri2 use emgd. Please pull into linux-yocto-3.0/meta. I've tossed this onto the pile. Once some testing completes, I'll push this out with my 3.0.2 update. Bruce Thanks, Tom The following changes ar

Re: [yocto] Configuring a layer to support multiple targets

2011-08-17 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 11-08-17 03:07 PM, Chris Tapp wrote: On 17 Aug 2011, at 16:18, Bruce Ashfield wrote: In this sense, the defconfig is simply a name to trigger specific processing. Just capture and call your .config 'defconfig' and you'll get a translation of those settings into the build.

Re: [yocto] linux-yocto 3.0.1 upgrade broke PREFERRED_VERSION setting in BSPs

2011-08-17 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 11-08-17 11:23 PM, Darren Hart wrote: We have just rolled out PREFERRED_VERSION="3.0+git%", and these now fail with messages like: NOTE: preferred version 3.0+git% of linux-yocto not available (for item virtual/kernel) I could patch everything really quick to use 3.0.1+git%... but 3.0.2 was

Re: [yocto] linux-yocto 3.0.1 upgrade broke PREFERRED_VERSION setting in BSPs

2011-08-17 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 11-08-18 12:11 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 11-08-17 11:23 PM, Darren Hart wrote: We have just rolled out PREFERRED_VERSION="3.0+git%", and these now fail with messages like: NOTE: preferred version 3.0+git% of linux-yocto not available (for item virtual/kernel) I could patch

Re: [yocto] linux-yocto 3.0.1 upgrade broke PREFERRED_VERSION setting in BSPs

2011-08-18 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 11-08-18 01:31 AM, Darren Hart wrote: On 08/17/2011 09:40 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 11-08-18 12:11 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 11-08-17 11:23 PM, Darren Hart wrote: We have just rolled out PREFERRED_VERSION="3.0+git%", and these now fail with messages like: NOTE: preferr

Re: [yocto] linux-yocto 3.0.1 upgrade broke PREFERRED_VERSION setting in BSPs

2011-08-18 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 11-08-18 09:02 AM, Tom Zanussi wrote: On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 21:11 -0700, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 11-08-17 11:23 PM, Darren Hart wrote: We have just rolled out PREFERRED_VERSION="3.0+git%", and these now fail with messages like: NOTE: preferred version 3.0+git% of linux-yocto not

Re: [yocto] Strange USB behavior

2011-08-18 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 11-08-18 3:36 PM, Chris Tapp wrote: On 18 Aug 2011, at 09:19, Chris Tapp wrote: I'm running on a platform using the Vortex86DX SoC which includes a CM119 USB audio interface. I've got a kernel configuration that recognizes and initializes this ok (dmesg reports it as an ALSA device). Howeve

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 1/9] meta-crownbay: switch to linux-yocto 3.0 kernel

2011-08-20 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 11-08-20 11:26 AM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote: From: Tom Zanussi Switch crownbay and crownbay-noemgd to the 3.0 kernel, lock it down, and update kernel SRCREVs. Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi --- meta-crownbay/conf/machine/crownbay-noemgd.conf|2 ++ meta-crownbay/conf/machine/crownba

Re: [yocto] [PATCH] meta: add APM Emulation option to beagleboard

2011-08-20 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 11-08-19 5:43 AM, walimis wrote: From: Liming Wang apmd daemon needs this option to work, so add this to beagleboard kernel config file. Merged into the 3.x and 2.6.37 meta branches. I'll push this out early next week. Bruce Signed-off-by: Liming Wang --- .../kernel-cache/bsp/beaglebo

Re: [yocto] linux-yocto 3.0.1 upgrade broke PREFERRED_VERSION setting in BSPs

2011-08-20 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 11-08-19 2:00 AM, Khem Raj wrote: On 8/17/2011 8:23 PM, Darren Hart wrote: We have just rolled out PREFERRED_VERSION="3.0+git%", and these now fail with messages like: NOTE: preferred version 3.0+git% of linux-yocto not available (for item virtual/kernel) I could patch everything really qui

Re: [yocto] [PATCH] script/runqemu: change boot command line for qemuppc

2011-08-22 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 11-08-22 04:21 AM, Liming Wang wrote: On 2011-8-20 0:28, Richard Purdie wrote: On Fri, 2011-08-19 at 18:06 +0800, Liming Wang wrote: Because qemuppc has no graphic emulation, remove console=tty0 and make it run into 3 run level. This can reduce boot time for qemuppc booting. Signed-off-by:

Re: [yocto] Configuring a layer to support multiple targets

2011-08-22 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 11-08-17 04:42 PM, Chris Tapp wrote: On 17 Aug 2011, at 21:24, Bruce Ashfield wrote: I have to head out for the day, but I'll loop around on this. Technically I'm out of the office for the next 2 days, but can sneak this in. I just need to double check a couple things in the 2.6.

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 1/1] x86: fix a bug of wrong return erorr.

2011-08-24 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 11-08-23 10:45 PM, Liming Wang wrote: __vdso_clock_gettime should fall back to call vdso_fallback_gettime function if no clockid is selected, not just return error. At a glance, this seems reasonable to me .. and then I looked a bit more. This is in fact introduced by lttng and the ENIVAL do

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/1] script/runqemu: change boot command line for qemuppc

2011-08-24 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 11-08-24 04:48 AM, Liming Wang wrote: This patch is just a workaround to speed up boot time of qemuppc, because qemuppc has no framebuffer support, no need to start X server for qemuppc. Richard suggested to fix the X scripts so that if an fbdev X server is in use and the framebuffer device

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/1] mips/rt: convert cascade interrupt to no threaded

2011-08-25 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 11-08-25 03:55 AM, Liming Wang wrote: This patch fixes yocto bug: [Bug 1392] qemumips: linux-yocto-rt_3.0 panics at boot Ack'd. I do recall a similar fix for mips back in the 2.6.27 days. Both for this and the timer interrupt. Will merge this shortly. Bruce Liming Wang (1): mips

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 1/1] scripts/runqemu: disable unfs boot mode for qemuppc

2011-08-25 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 11-08-25 04:44 AM, Liming Wang wrote: Because unfs boot mode is unstable for qemuppc, disable it temporarily. Signed-off-by: Liming Wang --- scripts/runqemu |6 ++ 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/scripts/runqemu b/scripts/runqemu index ed8c05b..10da6c

Re: [yocto] Strange build warning

2011-08-26 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 11-08-26 11:32 AM, Gary Thomas wrote: Building 'bitbake core-image-sato' from scratch: OE Build Configuration: BB_VERSION = "1.13.3" TARGET_ARCH = "i586" TARGET_OS = "linux" MACHINE = "qemux86" DISTRO = "poky" DISTRO_VERSION = "1.0+snapshot-20110826" TUNE_FEATURES = "m32 i586" TARGET_FPU = ""

Re: [yocto] Strange build warning

2011-08-26 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 11-08-26 11:52 AM, Gary Thomas wrote: On 2011-08-26 09:40, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 11-08-26 11:32 AM, Gary Thomas wrote: Building 'bitbake core-image-sato' from scratch: OE Build Configuration: BB_VERSION = "1.13.3" TARGET_ARCH = "i586" TARGET_OS = &quo

Re: [yocto] Strange build warning

2011-08-26 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 11-08-26 12:12 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 11-08-26 11:52 AM, Gary Thomas wrote: On 2011-08-26 09:40, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 11-08-26 11:32 AM, Gary Thomas wrote: Building 'bitbake core-image-sato' from scratch: OE Build Configuration: BB_VERSION = "1.13.3"

Re: [yocto] e100 driver does not build

2011-08-31 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 11-08-31 7:18 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote: On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 16:04 -0700, Saxena, Rahul wrote: I am unable to get the e100 driver to build for my BSP. I have configured to build it as a module. I do not see the e100.ko file being generated nor does CONFIG_E100 appear in the generated .con

Re: [yocto] e100 driver does not build

2011-09-01 Thread Bruce Ashfield
o is not set And that is should be read as "config foo is disabled" Bruce Thanks Rahul -----Original Message- From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 6:27 PM To: Zanussi, Tom Cc: Saxena, Rahul; yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject:

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/2] [KERNEL] Cover letter for the delete duplicate statement and delete unused cfg fragment patches

2011-09-01 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 11-09-01 4:41 PM, Saxena, Rahul wrote: Cover letter for the delete duplicate statement and delete unused cfg fragment patches Thanks. These look good. I'm preparing a pull request right now, so I'll merge these and include them in that update. Bruce Rahul Saxena (2): Removed duplicate s

Re: [yocto] Splitting processor and target in BSPs

2011-09-02 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 11-09-02 03:26 AM, Chris Tapp wrote: How should meta data be structured so that a layer can support a set of systems using a set of processors? For example, many of the 'eBox' systems use variants of the Vortex86 SoC. So, a set of machine files are needed for these (e.g. ebox-3300, ebox-3500m

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 1/2] [KERNEL] Removed duplicate statement

2011-09-02 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 11-09-01 04:41 PM, Saxena, Rahul wrote: Removed duplicate statement I noticed that these patches are Signed-off, can you confirm your Sign-off so I can add it to the patches? Bruce --- meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/fishriver/fishriver.scc | 1 - 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions

Re: [yocto] Splitting processor and target in BSPs

2011-09-03 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 11-09-03 7:32 AM, Chris Tapp wrote: On 2 Sep 2011, at 16:49, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote: On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 2:26 AM, Chris Tapp wrote: However, kernel configuration becomes a little bit more complicated as this is done by machine name. A kernel recipe will be needed for each machi

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/1][KERNEL] Re-enable systemtap after the 1.6 upgrade

2011-09-03 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 11-09-03 12:45 AM, Tom Zanussi wrote: To match the accompanying 1.6 systemtap upgrade. Please pull into linux-yocto-3.0/meta. The following changes are available in the git repository at: git://git.yoctoproject.org/linux-yocto-2.6.37-contrib.git tzanussi/reenable-systemtap http://git.yo

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/1][KERNEL] linux-yocto-3.0/meta: re-enable utrace

2011-09-05 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 11-09-05 12:04 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote: This patchset re-enables utrace. Tested on qemuppc, qemux86, qemux86-64, qemuarm (where it doesn't work, as expected - utrace doesn't currently support arm), and sugarbay. Please pull into linux-yocto-3.0/meta. merged to both 3.0 and yocto-dev (so it w

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/3][KERNEL] linux-yocto-3.0/yocto/standard/base: re-enable utrace

2011-09-05 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 11-09-05 12:05 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote: This patchset re-enables utrace. Tested on qemuppc, qemux86, qemux86-64, qemuarm (where it doesn't work, as expected - utrace doesn't currently support arm), and sugarbay. These patches are taken from the utrace-3.0 branch of the utrace git repo at git:/

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >