On 11-09-08 11:09 AM, Scott Garman wrote:
> On 09/07/2011 10:49 PM, 蔡振军 wrote:
>> Hi ALL
>>
>> QEMU run well with a pre-build kernel image from yocto site. Now just
>> change the kernel to one built myself, some error information appeared
>> about nfs. My kernel image version is 2.6.35 configured b
On 11-09-08 06:05 PM, Saxena, Rahul wrote:
Cover letter for separating 10/100 LAN feature from 1G and 10G.
Typically a machine does not need both of 10/100 and 1G/10G drivers.
The change looks fine, and I'd agree that this is a useful split.
BUT (there's always a but), there are a set of boards
On 11-09-08 07:30 PM, Saxena, Rahul wrote:
Cover letter for separating 10/100 LAN feature from 1G and 10G.
Typically a machine does not need both of 10/100 and 1G/10G drivers.
These look good now, but when I went to merge the patches I see they
are multipart, and html-ized. Which is causing me
ssage-
From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com]
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2011 11:52 AM
To: Saxena, Rahul
Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org; Bruce Ashfield; Zanussi, Tom
Subject: Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/3] [KERNEL] Cover letter for seperating 10/100
LAN feature from 1G and 10G
On 11-09-08 07:
On 11-09-09 07:09 PM, Zhang, Jessica wrote:
Hi,
Has anybody ran into kernel panic when boot up core-image-sato-sdk for
qemux86. I’ve been having this issue with several clean build for two
days. And my latest build tree is a freshly cloned tree against
poky-master with commit:
commit 20dbf00243
On 11-09-10 12:28 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Sat, 2011-09-10 at 09:21 -0600, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2011-09-10 07:13, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2011-09-09 17:09, Zhang, Jessica wrote:
Hi,
Has anybody ran into kernel panic when boot up core-image-sato-sdk for qemux86.
I’ve been having this issue
doing a kernel merge tomorrow, so this will be part of
that update.
Bruce
Reported-by: Kishore Bodke
Signed-off-by: Darren Hart
CC: Bruce Ashfield
---
kernel/stop_machine.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/stop_machine.c b/kernel/stop_machine.c
is still not part of the Linux-yocto-3.0
repository. Is there any reason it is being hold?
Thanks,
Nitin
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 1:30 PM
To: Kamble, Nitin A
Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re:
On 11-09-18 11:34 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
From: Tom Zanussi
Add a 'blktrace feature' that turns on kernel support for blktrace, a
block I/O tracing tool. Added to 'standard' alongside similar tracing
tool config.
Ack'd. I've merged this to the 3.0 tree, and the -dev tree so it will
a
On 11-09-21 02:01 AM, Ni Qingliang wrote:
the linux-yocto was updated to 3.0.4, but why linux-libc-headers still
2.6.37?
They should match. In the past Khem has done the update on the
header packages, since there are nearly as many toolchain issues
with the headers as with the kernel.
I though
On 11-09-21 4:33 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
From: Tom Zanussi
Please pull into linux-yocto-3.0/yocto/standard/emenlow-3.0.
merged and tracked for future updates. There's no SRCREVs for me to
update for this one, so you can take care of the meta-intel layer
SRCREV bump.
Cheers,
Bruce
On 11-09-29 10:40 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 09/29/2011 07:32 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
Hi Darren,
For the non-rt "shutdown now" works perfectly fine. For the rt
kernel, after the command is issued, it tries to halt the system and
hangs there forever after the connection to the X server is lo
On 11-09-29 04:17 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
From: Tom Zanussi
This allows us to move them out of the bsp config.
Good cleanup.
Bruce
Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi
---
meta/cfg/kernel-cache/features/drm-psb/drm-psb.cfg | 13 +
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 0 deleti
On 11-09-29 04:17 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
From: Tom Zanussi
Add a 'vesafb feature' that adds basic vesa framebuffer support.
This one is quite useful. I've seen a similar set of options
collected in other kernels and it has come in handy.
Bruce
Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi
---
...
On 11-09-29 04:17 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
From: Tom Zanussi
Remove unnecessary options or options already defined in base configs.
Ack'd. Looks like a nice streamlining.
Bruce
Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi
---
meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/crownbay/crownbay.cfg | 34 +
On 11-09-29 04:17 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
From: Tom Zanussi
This patchset is another step in some cleanup I'm doing for
the meta-intel bsps, basically removing unneeded or redundant
options and abstracting out useful features, in this case a
new vesafb feature used in this patchset by c
On 11-10-04 11:40 AM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
From: Tom Zanussi
A few of the 32-bit meta-intel BSPs need the boot-live config turned on
in order boot from iso images. This patchset does that for crownbay,
emenlow, fishriver, and fri2.
Tested on crownbay.
merged and out in the kernel rep
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 11:34 PM, wrote:
> From: Tom Zanussi
>
> This patchset is another step in some cleanup I'm doing for
> the meta-intel bsps, basically removing unneeded or redundant
> options and abstracting out useful features, in this case a
> new vesafb feature used in this patchset by
On 11-10-25 03:17 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
From: Tom Zanussi
This patchset adds a new power/intel feature containing power-related
config items for intel bsps and initially makes sugarbay and crownbay
use it.
It also removes the igb feature from common-pc-64, which shouldn't
be there an
On 11-10-27 8:45 PM, Brian Park wrote:
Hi,
I'm interested in using Yocto to build linux for PandaBoard. It seems
there are already patches some where that I can use to build for panda,
as I found some discussions mentioning PandaBoard patch in the archive.
But I could not apply it. I'd appreciate
say yocto, since as I've
mentioned there are other oe based configs and layers that can be
used for panda support as well).
Cheers,
Bruce
Thank you.
Brian
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Bruce Ashfield
mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com>> wrote:
On 11-10-27 8:45 PM, Brian
On 11-11-07 10:56 AM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
From: Tom Zanussi
This just finishes up the previous set of meta-intel cleanups. All
machines were build- and run-tested.
Please pull into linux-yocto-3.0 and linux-yocto-dev.
The following changes since commit 4095bb597a7bcd647856aa35b5fb863
On 11-11-08 02:22 PM, kishore.k.bo...@intel.com wrote:
From: Kishore Bodke
Hi All,
This is the patch to support rt in the kernel meta branch for romley.
Please pull into linux-yocto-3.0/meta and linux-yocto-dev/meta.
pull into my local repos, I'll have an update for this later today
or early
On 11-11-15 3:19 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
The following is a modified version the patch at:
Works for me as well, I'll update the variant in the yocto kernel
trees, while we wait to see if anyone upstream has any interest.
Bruce
meta/cfg/kernel-cache/patches/boot/mount_root-clarify-error-mess
On 11-11-16 10:45 AM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 11/15/2011 09:36 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 11-11-15 3:19 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
The following is a modified version the patch at:
Works for me as well, I'll update the variant in the yocto kernel
trees, while we wait to see if anyone ups
On 11-11-16 11:00 AM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 11/16/2011 07:51 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 11-11-16 10:45 AM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 11/15/2011 09:36 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 11-11-15 3:19 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
The following is a modified version the patch at:
Works for me as well
On 11-11-21 11:01 AM, Ilya Dmitrichenko wrote:
Hello List,
I have had an attempt to build a kernel from the git sources, trying
to checkout the v3.1.1 tag, but it appeared to be more difficult then
I thought. Most of the problem I have had with the yocto-specific
metadata and some of the extra t
On 11-11-29 04:39 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
I'm experimenting with Matt Fleming's EFI_STUB patches. The first 10 patches
were working fine, but when I try to add the 11th, the do_patch fails. I found
that it isn't trying to apply the patches in the order listed in the recipe -
no in any other rec
On 11-11-29 07:46 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 11/29/2011 03:14 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 11-11-29 04:39 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
I'm experimenting with Matt Fleming's EFI_STUB patches. The first 10 patches
were working fine, but when I try to add the 11th, the do_patch fails. I f
On 11-11-29 07:41 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 11/29/2011 03:14 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 11-11-29 04:39 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
I'm experimenting with Matt Fleming's EFI_STUB patches. The first 10 patches
were working fine, but when I try to add the 11th, the do_patch fails. I f
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 8:21 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
> On 11/29/2011 05:15 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
>> On 11/29/2011 04:41 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/29/2011 03:14 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>>>> On 11-11-29 04:39 PM, Darren Hart wr
On 11-11-30 05:31 PM, Joshua Lock wrote:
On 30/11/11 03:46, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Wed, 30 Nov 2011, Paul Eggleton wrote:
On Tuesday 29 November 2011 18:00:31 Robert P. J. Day wrote:
i'm sure it's in one of the docs i missed, but how does one cleanly
shut down a QEMU session and get ba
On 11-11-30 05:47 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Joshua Lock,
In message<4ed6aed5.8070...@linux.intel.com> you wrote:
What do people think to the idea of putting something into the image for
those two specific machines which aliases poweroff to reboot?
I consider it a really bad idea, as "po
On 11-12-07 02:19 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
From: Darren Hart
The following patches have been merged back from upstream to address various
issues with the EFI boot process. These are intended to be merged with
yocto/standard/base.
Please watch for a subsequent patch adding a series of efi config f
On 11-12-07 5:50 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
The following changes since commit 67ce7623909cef63927fd145026aaf371cf4abf1:
meta: bumping kver to v3.0.10 (2011-11-23 00:33:19 -0500)
Merged. Will push it out in the morning.
Bruce
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.infradead.or
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 2:24 AM, David Nyström wrote:
>
>
> From: Koen Kooi [k...@dominion.thruhere.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 15:07
> To: Paul Eggleton
> Cc: Chris Larson; David Nyström; yocto@yoctoproject.org
> Subject: Re: [yocto] Variable
On 11-12-09 5:52 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
Bruce,
I'm looking at introducing a new kernel type, ktypes/tiny.
Tiny will define a core set of kernel policy options, such as proc, sys,
devtmpfs, futex, epoll, elf bin format, etc. It will not enable any
drivers, filesystems, debug options, or networki
On 11-12-09 5:52 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
Bruce,
I'm looking at introducing a new kernel type, ktypes/tiny.
Tiny will define a core set of kernel policy options, such as proc, sys,
devtmpfs, futex, epoll, elf bin format, etc. It will not enable any
drivers, filesystems, debug options, or networki
On 11-12-13 5:50 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
Hi,
I get failure for the linux-yoctort_3.0.bb file for the poky Edison branch.
Darren told that it was fixed and merged to master.
This shouldn't be happening on edison at all. The changes to the
kernel recipes/tools to use the merge_config.sh sho
anch while you are fed the new tools.
Cheers,
Bruce
Thanks
Kishore.
-Original Message-
From: Hart, Darren
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2011 3:15 PM
To: Bruce Ashfield
Cc: Bodke, Kishore K; yocto@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: kernel-tools failure for linux-yoctort_3.0.bb for poky/edison
b
On 11-12-13 6:05 PM, David Smoot wrote:
I'm still very new and very clueless but I humbly submit what looks like
a bug to me..
"routerstationpro.conf" in meta-yocto/conf/machine/ lists machine
features the hardware does not have.
http://www.ubnt.com/wiki/RouterStation_Pro lists the hardware spe
On 11-12-13 6:33 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
We currently build at least some MACHINES with 2.6.37 of
linux-libc-headers. This can cause problems for newer packages (such as
connman) that expect more recent headers (if_alg.h is missing prior to
2.6.39). While the proper fix is to ensure these packages
for merge_log.txt in your
linux/meta/cfg/ directory structure and that will tell us exactly
what is going wrong.
Bruce
Thanks
Kishore.
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2011 3:25 PM
To: Bodke, Kishore K
Cc: Hart, Darre
On 11-12-13 6:43 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 12/13/2011 03:41 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 11-12-13 6:33 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
We currently build at least some MACHINES with 2.6.37 of
linux-libc-headers. This can cause problems for newer packages (such as
connman) that expect more recent
On 11-12-13 6:46 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
We hit another lock-step SRCREV bug earlier on the FRI2 BSP. This was
due mostly to my pushing the efi changes to meta-intel too early - but,
it highlights a maintenance step that I believe could be eliminated for
most boards.
We have a yocto/standard/fri2
On 11-12-14 12:47 AM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 12/13/2011 09:13 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 11-12-13 6:26 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
Yes.
Its with poky Edison with poky-extras/meta-kernel-dev master branch I am using
for my build.
This is likely the problem. I use and test meta-kernel-dev
On 11-12-14 04:31 AM, Zumeng Chen wrote:
1. No mass storage needed to be accessed by usbgadget.
2. This is a router station& switch, so it should not
be taken as a USB_NET device too.
Zumeng,
The comment from the bug reporter was also that the target
doesn't have USB slave hardwar
On 11-12-12 06:17 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 12/11/2011 09:14 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 11-12-09 5:52 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
Bruce,
I'm looking at introducing a new kernel type, ktypes/tiny.
Tiny will define a core set of kernel policy options, such as proc, sys,
devtmpfs, futex,
On 11-12-14 01:07 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 12/14/2011 08:59 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 11-12-12 06:17 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 12/11/2011 09:14 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 11-12-09 5:52 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
Bruce,
I'm looking at introducing a new kernel type, ktypes/tiny.
On 11-12-14 02:06 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 12/14/2011 10:43 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 11-12-14 01:07 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
Heavily trimmed down to the remaining points of discussion...
Everyone thanks you. I thought of doing that as well on my
last reply.
So what does that mean
On 11-12-14 8:02 PM, Zumeng Chen wrote:
Since the target doesn't have the related requirement
to use USB slave hardware supporting usb gadget, so
remove it from MACHINE_FEATURES.
Indention went a bit out of whack there, but the wording is what
we want.
Acked-by: Bruce Ash
On 11-12-14 7:54 PM, Saxena, Rahul wrote:
I made a mistake in specifying the machine branch name:
The new machine branch should be:
"yocto/standard/cedartrail"
instead of
"yocto/standard/cedartview"
Sorry about that.
No problem at all. I read the right thing even if you didn't
type it :
On 11-12-15 5:23 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 21:47 +, Chris Tapp wrote:
Is anyone on this list considering (or working on) a BSP for the
Raspberry Pi (http://www.raspberrypi.org/faqs) ?
For those that haven't seen it, it's a credit-card sized 'home pc'
aimed primarily at
after applying the patches, the build went through, but the image does
not boot.
Darren might comment on that.
Bruce
Thanks
Kishore.
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2011 6:07 AM
To: Hart, Darren
Cc: Bodke
On 11-12-16 8:31 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
do_install() has changed over versions of kern-tools, ensure this matches
the latest sources as referenced by ${AUTOREV}. Without this, using
this bbappend against older kern-tools recipes will fail in very strange
and unexplainable ways. The edison recipe
Bruce
--
Darren
-Original Message-
From: Bodke, Kishore K
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011 5:07 PM
To: Hart, Darren
Cc: Bruce Ashfield; yocto@yoctoproject.org
Subject: RE: kernel-tools failure for linux-yoctort_3.0.bb for poky/edison
branch.
Hi,
I still get the same error below afte
On 11-12-21 04:09 AM, Darren Hart wrote:
This patch adds a similar linux-yocto-tiny recipe for fri2 that
my poky-tiny patch provides for qemux86. This one adds the necessary
bits to boot poky-tiny on fri2. The kernel increases in size by some
200k to accomodate the EFI, EG20T, and USB support. As
On 11-12-21 04:02 AM, Darren Hart wrote:
linux-yocto-tiny drops the linux-tools and sets the KMACHINE
branch to standard/tiny.
Signed-off-by: Darren Hart
---
meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-tiny/ata.cfg |9 +
.../recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-tiny/core.cfg | 19 +
.../linux/li
On 11-12-21 10:24 AM, zumeng.chen wrote:
This patch has been validated by the following commands
on both CPUs with or without cache alias, which is for
http://bugzilla.pokylinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1429
Glad to see this. I was composing an email that had just this
question. Which bug, and whic
On 11-12-21 10:52 AM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 12/21/2011 06:56 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 11-12-21 04:02 AM, Darren Hart wrote:
linux-yocto-tiny drops the linux-tools and sets the KMACHINE
branch to standard/tiny.
Signed-off-by: Darren Hart
---
meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-tiny
On 11-12-21 11:02 AM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 12/21/2011 07:56 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 11-12-21 10:52 AM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 12/21/2011 06:56 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 11-12-21 04:02 AM, Darren Hart wrote:
linux-yocto-tiny drops the linux-tools and sets the KMACHINE
branch to
On 11-12-21 01:58 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
linux-yocto-tiny drops the linux-tools and sets the KMACHINE
branch to standard/tiny.
Signed-off-by: Darren Hart
---
meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-tiny/ata.cfg |9 +
.../recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-tiny/core.cfg | 19 +
.../linux/li
On 11-12-21 10:07 PM, Zumeng Chen wrote:
There are two problems as follows shown:
1 ) for TMPFS, nothing need to be done in sys_msync,
sys_msync just return 0 for all arches.
2 ) But for MIPS CPUs with cache alias(dmesg|grep alias),
it maybe has the issue, which reported by msync test
On 11-12-19 11:55 AM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
Hi,
This is what I hope to implement in the M2 timeframe.
Any and all comments welcome...
Thanks,
Tom
---
Getting Yocto running on a new board is often a prerequisite task to
the real task of interest for new users, which is creating new
applications
On 11-12-23 08:10 AM, James Abernathy wrote:
On Dec 23, 2011, at 3:50 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 23 dec. 2011, om 09:37 heeft Paul Eggleton het volgende geschreven:
On Friday 23 December 2011 09:28:31 Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 22 dec. 2011, om 16:06 heeft Jim Abernathy het volgende geschreven:
I k
On 11-12-23 12:38 PM, Philip Balister wrote:
On 12/23/2011 12:10 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 11-12-23 08:10 AM, James Abernathy wrote:
On Dec 23, 2011, at 3:50 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 23 dec. 2011, om 09:37 heeft Paul Eggleton het volgende geschreven:
On Friday 23 December 2011 09:28:31
On 11-12-23 12:52 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 23 dec. 2011, om 18:45 heeft Bruce Ashfield het volgende geschreven:
On 11-12-23 12:38 PM, Philip Balister wrote:
On 12/23/2011 12:10 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 11-12-23 08:10 AM, James Abernathy wrote:
On Dec 23, 2011, at 3:50 AM, Koen Kooi
On 12-01-03 11:53 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On (22/12/11 09:24), Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 11-12-21 10:07 PM, Zumeng Chen wrote:
There are two problems as follows shown:
1 ) for TMPFS, nothing need to be done in sys_msync,
sys_msync just return 0 for all arches.
2 ) But for MIPS CPUs with cache
On 12-01-04 12:15 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On (23/12/11 12:59), Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 11-12-23 12:52 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 23 dec. 2011, om 18:45 heeft Bruce Ashfield het volgende geschreven:
On 11-12-23 12:38 PM, Philip Balister wrote:
On 12/23/2011 12:10 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 11
On 12-01-10 10:47 AM, James Abernathy wrote:
I created a core-image-sato using the meta-n450 BSP hoping I could work
with it on the Acer Aspire One 532h-2588. However, that netbook uses the
Atheros AR5B95 wireless NIC and the Atheros AR8132 wired NIC, which are
not recognized. Is there anything a
On 12-01-10 11:31 AM, Jim Abernathy wrote:
On 01/10/2012 10:50 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-01-10 10:47 AM, James Abernathy wrote:
I created a core-image-sato using the meta-n450 BSP hoping I could work
with it on the Acer Aspire One 532h-2588. However, that netbook uses the
Atheros AR5B95
On 12-01-02 02:31 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
From: Tom Zanussi
This patchset adds a new yocto/emgd-1.10 feature branch to linux-yocto-3.0,
alongside the existing yocto/emgd branch containing emgd-1.8.
Bruce, please don't merge this yet though - it depends on the new emgd-1.10
recipe, whic
On 12-01-10 03:55 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 15:50 -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-01-02 02:31 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
From: Tom Zanussi
This patchset adds a new yocto/emgd-1.10 feature branch to linux-yocto-3.0,
alongside the existing yocto/emgd branch
On 12-01-11 02:01 AM, Zhai, Edwin wrote:
Bruce,
Can we enable SMP and virtio by default for qemux86/x86-64? This can achieve
huge perf boost for workload inside qemu. E.g. we enabled self-hosted image,
where we build yocto inside qemu.
Attached patch showes the kernel config option.
Is it reaso
On 12-01-11 09:41 AM, Brian Hutchinson wrote:
Hi,
I followed the example in the "Yocto Project Development Manual" for
setting up a local kernel repo and it didn't go so well.
A month or two ago I checked out Edison and was able to build all the
images required for Beagleboard and it booted fin
On 12-01-11 10:20 AM, Brian Hutchinson wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Bruce Ashfield
wrote:
It will. I sent patches recently to make that the preferred version
in the master branch. Cherry picking that change would probably
be all you would need.
2. Is the example for setting up
On 12-01-11 10:24 AM, Jack Mitchell wrote:
On 11/01/12 15:20, Brian Hutchinson wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Bruce Ashfield
wrote:
It will. I sent patches recently to make that the preferred version
in the master branch. Cherry picking that change would probably
be all you would
On 12-01-11 03:35 PM, Brian Hutchinson wrote:
wrote:
Just so I'm clear. You are asking about the switch to 3.0 as the
default ? If so, that was only done in master for the upcoming 1.2
release and not on the edison branch, so you wouldn't pick it up
by pulling.
Thanks! I did a git checkout
On 12-01-12 10:21 AM, Brian Hutchinson wrote:
Yet another follow up. I finally found my C3 Beagleboard and the
default kernel built off master yesterday works on that platform too.
I was able to do another build with the tips you guys gave and it
looks like it is picking up the kernel from my l
On 12-01-12 11:20 AM, Brian Hutchinson wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Bruce Ashfield
wrote:
The bitbake AUTOREV code should take care of updating the clone
of your local repo in downloads/git2. I take it that this isn't
happening ?
... haven't tried ... was just stick
On 12-01-12 11:48 AM, Brian Hutchinson wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Bruce Ashfield
wrote:
I prefer to work this way, since managing patches in a source git
repository is much easier for me. If you only have a few patches,
then they can just be pushed on top and added to the
On 12-01-12 03:52 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 01/12/2012 12:39 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On Fri, 2011-12-16 at 19:03 -0800, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 11-12-16 8:34 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 12/16/2011 05:22 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
With the attached Darren's kern-tools-native_git.bb
On 12-01-12 09:50 PM, James Abernathy wrote:
I'm trying to do the Developer Manual Appendix B example exactly as
written only changing the path to my home directory. When I get to
B.1.8.3, bitbake after patching the kernel calibrate.c and modifiing
the path to the local git repository for linux
On 12-01-12 03:39 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On Fri, 2011-12-16 at 19:03 -0800, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 11-12-16 8:34 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 12/16/2011 05:22 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
With the attached Darren's kern-tools-native_git.bb file, build was success.
Thanks
Kishore.
Se
On 12-01-16 01:40 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
Hi,
I get build failure for the rt.
ERROR: Function 'do_patch' failed (see
/usr/local/src/jan13/poky/build-rt/tmp/work/cedartrail-poky-linux/linux-yocto-rt-3.0.14+git1+6ae3d992cf546184010e87a0349810198f1d167c_1+bcf4107c7f22d10952618a2ad146e6149d240c
On 12-01-12 08:14 AM, Zhai, Edwin wrote:
Bruce,
Thanks for your efforts!
FYI: I haven't forgotten about this, I'm just reworking a few
things with the 3.2 kernel tree, and will include this as part
of that effort. It will all be available soon.
Bruce
Edwin
On 2012/1/11 20
On 12-01-22 10:33 PM, Brian Hutchinson wrote:
OK, hate to bring this up again but I must be doing something wrong.
My kernel changes don't appear to be getting picked up. I thought it
was OK before but then I did some real work on the kernel and that is
when I realized something isn't right.
To
On 12-01-19 4:34 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
Bruce, please apply to linux-yocto-3.0/yocto/standard/base
Queued.
Bruce
Upstream-Status: Accepted (Linux 3.3)
If the MAC is invalid or not implemented, do not abort the probe. Issue
a warning and prevent bringing the interface up until a MAC is set
On 12-01-23 08:10 AM, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2012-01-23 05:51, jfabernathy wrote:
On 01/22/2012 08:12 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2012-01-22 13:19, James Abernathy wrote:
I have used both git and the tarball methods of bitbaking projects,
all of them derivatives of the examples in the Yocto docum
Ashfield
Date: Mon Jan 16 13:45:11 2012 -0500
meta/rt: fix reference to non-existent patch
Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield
:100644 100644 8c4d748... 4b9e9ed... M
meta/cfg/kernel-cache/features/rt/rt.scc
Which is the error you are seeing. The change is destined
for master. If you are on
patch.patch"
is completely removed. So you'll have to wait for my request to be
merged, or cherry pick the change.
Bruce
Thanks
Kishore.
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com]
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2012 10:06 AM
To: Bodke, Kishore K
C
On 12-01-23 7:26 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 01/22/2012 08:01 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-01-19 4:34 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
Bruce, please apply to linux-yocto-3.0/yocto/standard/base
Queued.
I don't see this in the repository yet, is it still pending? I'm trying
to write a B
On 12-01-24 01:28 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-01-23 7:26 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 01/22/2012 08:01 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-01-19 4:34 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
Bruce, please apply to linux-yocto-3.0/yocto/standard/base
Queued.
I don't see this in the repository yet,
On 12-01-25 03:30 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 15:50 -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-01-02 02:31 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
From: Tom Zanussi
This patchset adds a new yocto/emgd-1.10 feature branch to linux-yocto-3.0,
alongside the existing yocto/emgd branch
On 12-01-17 9:06 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-01-12 08:14 AM, Zhai, Edwin wrote:
Bruce,
Thanks for your efforts!
FYI: I haven't forgotten about this, I'm just reworking a few
things with the 3.2 kernel tree, and will include this as part
of that effort. It will all be available s
On 12-01-02 02:31 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
From: Tom Zanussi
This patchset adds a new yocto/emgd-1.10 feature branch to linux-yocto-3.0,
alongside the existing yocto/emgd branch containing emgd-1.8.
Bruce, please don't merge this yet though - it depends on the new emgd-1.10
recipe, whic
being
merged. Will let you know when all that's taken care of and it's safe to
pull this in.
merged with the emgd changes. Build testing now.
Bruce
Thanks,
Tom
The following changes since commit c979f1365b1eb74e882b2cbbc8407ec536ab6eb8:
Bruce Ashfield (1):
meta/routstat
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 9:51 AM, James Abernathy wrote:
> While I've read enough to think I understand git, I get confused when it's
> applied to real situations like Yocto. If I look at the Yocto Development
> Manual, Appendix A, A.5.2.4 Changing Recipes-kernel, It brings up some
> questions.
>
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 8:57 PM, wrote:
> From: Jingdong Lu
>
> Using CONFIG_PANEL_GENERIC_DPI=y instead of CONFIG_PANEL_GENERIC=y
> for beagleboard.
I've got this one queued in the next 3.0 update.
Cheers,
Bruce
>
> Signed-off-by: Jingdong Lu
> ---
> .../kernel-cache/bsp/beagleboard/beagl
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 7:00 AM, James Abernathy wrote:
>
> On Jan 28, 2012, at 6:25 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 9:51 AM, James Abernathy
> wrote:
>
> While I've read enough to think I understand git, I get confused when it's
>
>
301 - 400 of 1414 matches
Mail list logo
