On 2013-04-19 17:28, Zdenek Pavlas wrote:
>> Using it in yum-utils is a matter of prepending "_xfunc yum " to all
>> calls of functions that are in yum's. There are some examples of this in
>> bash-completion itself.
>
> Is that any better than adding a one-liner at the top?
Cleaner IMO, upstream
> Using it in yum-utils is a matter of prepending "_xfunc yum " to all
> calls of functions that are in yum's. There are some examples of this in
> bash-completion itself.
Is that any better than adding a one-liner at the top?
> BTW if assuming presence of bash-completion >= 2.0 is acceptable, th
James Antill
O 1) If we ever move away from curl,
Is there any reason to do this?
Using yum behind proxy before curl was introduced was not fun.
- Terje
___
Yum-devel mailing list
Yum-devel@lists.baseurl.org
http://lists.baseurl.org/mailman/listin
> Yeh, that's what I meant ... was kind of hoping you'd found some random
> socks proxy so didn't have to set one up too.
So it works, including https...
# yum install 3proxy
# socks -p3000 -l
130419080935.314 3000 00421 - 127.0.0.1:42732 0.0.0.0:0 0 0 0 UNKNOWN 0.0.0.0:0
130419080936.198 3000 0
