Re: [zd1211-devs] Experiments with the vendor driver

2007-01-01 Thread Giulio Bottazzi
On Sun, 31 Dec 2006 18:56:11 -0500 Jon Smirl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Patch to make the vendor driver, ZD1211LnxDrv_2_16_0_0, build on 2.6.20-rc20. It also fixes what looks to be some definite problems with uninitialized variables. Hi Jon, I tried to compile with your patch. The situation

Re: [zd1211-devs] Experiments with the vendor driver

2007-01-01 Thread Jon Smirl
On 1/1/07, Giulio Bottazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 31 Dec 2006 18:56:11 -0500 Jon Smirl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Patch to make the vendor driver, ZD1211LnxDrv_2_16_0_0, build on 2.6.20-rc20. It also fixes what looks to be some definite problems with uninitialized variables. Hi

Re: [zd1211-devs] Experiments with the vendor driver

2007-01-01 Thread Giulio Bottazzi
On Mon, 1 Jan 2007 09:01:38 -0500 Jon Smirl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The INIT work changes went into 2.6.20+, they aren't in 2.6.18. It shouldn't be too hard to fix up the code to work on both releases. You just need to remove the INIT work changes and revert to the prior code. Thanks Jon.

Re: [zd1211-devs] Experiments with the vendor driver

2007-01-01 Thread Jon Smirl
On 1/1/07, Giulio Bottazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 1 Jan 2007 09:01:38 -0500 Jon Smirl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The INIT work changes went into 2.6.20+, they aren't in 2.6.18. It shouldn't be too hard to fix up the code to work on both releases. You just need to remove the INIT

[zd1211-devs] Experiments with the vendor driver

2006-12-31 Thread Jon Smirl
I've ported the vendor driver ZD1211LnxDrv_2_16_0_0 to 2.6.20-rc2. I'll post the patch shortly. I definitely fixed a few bugs that were revealed by using a newer gcc. Vendor driver is working at exactly the same speed as rw1211rw. But I have a new clue, if I tell the driver to use 54M it refuses