On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 7:38 AM, Martin Sustrik sust...@250bpm.com wrote:
There are several possible advantages of this:
Agreed.
As for the actual publishing of the docs, I've been thinking about it a
bit and here are my thoughts...
Makes sense, but I'd include the generated docs with the
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 1:38 AM, Martin Sustrik sust...@250bpm.com wrote:
Pieter Hintjens wrote:
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 11:08 PM, Peter Alexander vel.ac...@gmail.com wrote:
http://travlr.github.com/zeromq2/
Peter, it looks really nice and this looks like the right way to host
the generated
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 7:16 AM, Pieter Hintjens p...@imatix.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 7:38 AM, Martin Sustrik sust...@250bpm.com wrote:
There are several possible advantages of this:
Agreed.
As for the actual publishing of the docs, I've been thinking about it a
bit and here are
Peter Alexander wrote:
1. It doesn't make sense to distribute the generated docs with the
package. Packages are for users. Users don't need detailed code
documentation. Developers, on the other hand, are presumably not using
packages, rather checking out the recent version from trunk.
Its
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 8:06 AM, Martin Sustrik sust...@250bpm.com wrote:
Peter Alexander wrote:
1. It doesn't make sense to distribute the generated docs with the
package. Packages are for users. Users don't need detailed code
documentation. Developers, on the other hand, are presumably not
