[zeromq-dev] [PATCH] Documentation updates for 2.1

2010-11-30 Thread Martin Lucina
Martin, please review and apply to master if you're happy with it. This should cover all the basics that have changed in 2.1; I've tried to be as clear as possible with the tricky bits (Thread safety, ZMQ_LINGER & friends). Thanks, -mato >From b064d9af489344a99961c7950af226bd171e8bbb Mon Sep 17

Re: [zeromq-dev] Python translations: rtdealer, rtmama, rtpapa

2010-11-30 Thread Pieter Hintjens
Done, thanks! :-) On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 6:32 PM, jeremy avnet wrote: > This code is licensed under the MIT/X11 license. > > https://github.com/imatix/zguide/pull/21 > > .:. brainsik > > ___ > zeromq-dev mailing list > zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org > htt

Re: [zeromq-dev] [PATCH] Build refactoring take two

2010-11-30 Thread Martin Lucina
Martin, mikko.koppa...@gmail.com said: > Hello, > > the latest version of the patch is here > http://valokuva.org/~mikko/0001-Prefix-variables-with-ac_zmq_.patch. I > am not attaching it as it's fairly large. The latest verion fixes the > above white-space errors and a couple of typos. Please ap

Re: [zeromq-dev] [PATCH] Build refactoring take two

2010-11-30 Thread Mikko Koppanen
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Martin Lucina wrote: > This is great, except that the patch doesn't seem to apply against the > current master: > > [dezo:zeromq2]$ git apply ~/0001-Prefix-all-custom-macros-with-AC_ZMQ_.patch > /home/mato/0001-Prefix-all-custom-macros-with-AC_ZMQ_.patch:341: trail

[zeromq-dev] Python translations: rtdealer, rtmama, rtpapa

2010-11-30 Thread jeremy avnet
This code is licensed under the MIT/X11 license. https://github.com/imatix/zguide/pull/21 .:. brainsik ___ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

[zeromq-dev] [PATCH] Remove unnecessary cast in kevent_delete

2010-11-30 Thread Martin Lucina
Martin, the attached trivial patch fixes the build on NetBSD. Please apply to master, and/or maint if applicable. Thanks, -mato >From 73a64202bca9f1a24c9c0814d8bbf760add68e37 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Martin Lucina Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 17:41:58 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Remove unnecessary

Re: [zeromq-dev] orderly shutdown

2010-11-30 Thread Martin Lucina
Hi, koert.kuip...@diamondnotch.com said: > How do I do an orderly shutdown of a socket? Say I want to close a PULL > socket. > Can I do something like: > > 1) Close the endpoint so that no more messages get added to the queue > > 2) Process everything that’s left in the queue > > 3)

[zeromq-dev] orderly shutdown

2010-11-30 Thread Koert Kuipers
How do I do an orderly shutdown of a socket? Say I want to close a PULL socket. Can I do something like: 1) Close the endpoint so that no more messages get added to the queue 2) Process everything that's left in the queue 3) Terminate Thanks! Koert ___

Re: [zeromq-dev] IPC on Windows (again)

2010-11-30 Thread Martin Lucina
marcelo.can...@gmail.com said: > 2010/10/28 Mikael Helbo Kjær > > ... I could really use an IPC solution for Windows. ... > > > I would love to see this too. I understand that the problems with implementing > IPC on Windows are significant, so I am trying to decide between several > options

Re: [zeromq-dev] [PATCH] Build refactoring take two

2010-11-30 Thread Martin Lucina
Hi Mikko! mikko.koppa...@gmail.com said: > [...] > > Mato, > does this look ok? This is great, except that the patch doesn't seem to apply against the current master: [dezo:zeromq2]$ git apply ~/0001-Prefix-all-custom-macros-with-AC_ZMQ_.patch /home/mato/0001-Prefix-all-custom-macros-with-AC_Z

Re: [zeromq-dev] Publisher side filtering... (draft)

2010-11-30 Thread Gerard Toonstra
I've been working on this again yesterday and attached is a draft approach that works, but has some serious issues to be addressed. So this should be regarded a draft, intended to receive comments on the approach taken. The following issues are to be addressed: 1. I've now used the "fair-queue"

[zeromq-dev] Larger Linux TCP initial window

2010-11-30 Thread Steven McCoy
In case you missed the discussion, http://developers.slashdot.org/story/10/11/26/1729218/Google-Microsoft-Cheat-On-Slow-Start-mdash-Should-You Google's paper: http://www.google.com/research/pubs/pub36640.html IEFT draft: http://zinfandel.levkowetz.com/html/draft-ietf-tcpm-initcwnd-00 Linux patch

Re: [zeromq-dev] IPC on Windows (again)

2010-11-30 Thread Steven McCoy
On 30 November 2010 15:57, Sven Koebnick wrote: > a few years ago, I read some artical about cheating IPC into Windows. it > worked with using parts of the paging file as a shared datafile and thereby > simulating shared memory. > Maybe this can be wrapped to just plug it into where IPC sits on r