I will have some time most likely the week of Nov6 (off for a week of C++
Committee 'fun') to test different message size alternatives. I'll follow
up with my results here for consideration the next time we are inclined to
break the ABI compatibility :)
On Sunday, October 16, 2016, Brian Knox
Yes,
I had used
zsocket_set_router_handover( self->router, 1);
in my code.
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 7:21 PM, Doron Somech wrote:
> Is the handover option enabled?
>
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 11:13 AM, Ranjeet Kumar
> wrote:
> > Hi Martin,
> >
> > Yes,
Try compile zeromq with the tweak I suggested and the multipart test case.
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 4:56 PM, zmqdev wrote:
> On 20.10.2016 15:46, Doron Somech wrote:
>>
>> I actually those are different issues. If you suffer from the pubsub
>> issue, I think I trace the bug
Is the handover option enabled?
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 11:13 AM, Ranjeet Kumar wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> Yes, it is very often. I am having 100k clients connecting with my server.
> So in order to run the application i had commented the line from fq.cpp 117
> zmq_assert
On 20.10.2016 15:46, Doron Somech wrote:
I actually those are different issues. If you suffer from the pubsub
issue, I think I trace the bug and have a solution. Take a look at the
issue. If you suffer from the 100K issue, I think that is a different
one, anyway you can try the solution as well.
I actually those are different issues. If you suffer from the pubsub
issue, I think I trace the bug and have a solution. Take a look at the
issue. If you suffer from the 100K issue, I think that is a different
one, anyway you can try the solution as well. It might be related to
another
On 20.10.2016 14:31, Doron Somech wrote:
Also I think it smells like using socket from multiple threads...
unfortunately no, the assertion strikes in a single thread application.
See also the test case at
https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq/issues/2163
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 3:28 PM,
Also I think it smells like using socket from multiple threads...
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Doron Somech wrote:
> It don't think it is correct, there might be an issue we need to solve.
>
> The workaround is not to use multi-part messages...
>
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at
It don't think it is correct, there might be an issue we need to solve.
The workaround is not to use multi-part messages...
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 10:11 AM, zmqdev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ranjeet Kumar described his troubles with the assertion in
>
>
>
Hi,
Ranjeet Kumar described his troubles with the assertion in
http://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/2016-September/030839.html
According to
http://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/2016-September/030851.html
he apparently solved his problem by commenting the
10 matches
Mail list logo