Re: [zeromq-dev] ZeroMQ 4.2 release, planning

2016-10-20 Thread Thomas Rodgers
I will have some time most likely the week of Nov6 (off for a week of C++ Committee 'fun') to test different message size alternatives. I'll follow up with my results here for consideration the next time we are inclined to break the ABI compatibility :) On Sunday, October 16, 2016, Brian Knox

Re: [zeromq-dev] Assertion failed: !more (src/fq.cpp:117)

2016-10-20 Thread Ranjeet Kumar
Yes, I had used zsocket_set_router_handover( self->router, 1); in my code. On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 7:21 PM, Doron Somech wrote: > Is the handover option enabled? > > On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 11:13 AM, Ranjeet Kumar > wrote: > > Hi Martin, > > > > Yes,

Re: [zeromq-dev] about Assertion failed: !more (src/fq.cpp:117): just remove the assertion?

2016-10-20 Thread Doron Somech
Try compile zeromq with the tweak I suggested and the multipart test case. On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 4:56 PM, zmqdev wrote: > On 20.10.2016 15:46, Doron Somech wrote: >> >> I actually those are different issues. If you suffer from the pubsub >> issue, I think I trace the bug

Re: [zeromq-dev] Assertion failed: !more (src/fq.cpp:117)

2016-10-20 Thread Doron Somech
Is the handover option enabled? On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 11:13 AM, Ranjeet Kumar wrote: > Hi Martin, > > Yes, it is very often. I am having 100k clients connecting with my server. > So in order to run the application i had commented the line from fq.cpp 117 > zmq_assert

Re: [zeromq-dev] about Assertion failed: !more (src/fq.cpp:117): just remove the assertion?

2016-10-20 Thread zmqdev
On 20.10.2016 15:46, Doron Somech wrote: I actually those are different issues. If you suffer from the pubsub issue, I think I trace the bug and have a solution. Take a look at the issue. If you suffer from the 100K issue, I think that is a different one, anyway you can try the solution as well.

Re: [zeromq-dev] about Assertion failed: !more (src/fq.cpp:117): just remove the assertion?

2016-10-20 Thread Doron Somech
I actually those are different issues. If you suffer from the pubsub issue, I think I trace the bug and have a solution. Take a look at the issue. If you suffer from the 100K issue, I think that is a different one, anyway you can try the solution as well. It might be related to another

Re: [zeromq-dev] about Assertion failed: !more (src/fq.cpp:117): just remove the assertion?

2016-10-20 Thread zmqdev
On 20.10.2016 14:31, Doron Somech wrote: Also I think it smells like using socket from multiple threads... unfortunately no, the assertion strikes in a single thread application. See also the test case at https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq/issues/2163 On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 3:28 PM,

Re: [zeromq-dev] about Assertion failed: !more (src/fq.cpp:117): just remove the assertion?

2016-10-20 Thread Doron Somech
Also I think it smells like using socket from multiple threads... On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Doron Somech wrote: > It don't think it is correct, there might be an issue we need to solve. > > The workaround is not to use multi-part messages... > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at

Re: [zeromq-dev] about Assertion failed: !more (src/fq.cpp:117): just remove the assertion?

2016-10-20 Thread Doron Somech
It don't think it is correct, there might be an issue we need to solve. The workaround is not to use multi-part messages... On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 10:11 AM, zmqdev wrote: > Hi, > > Ranjeet Kumar described his troubles with the assertion in > > >

[zeromq-dev] about Assertion failed: !more (src/fq.cpp:117): just remove the assertion?

2016-10-20 Thread zmqdev
Hi, Ranjeet Kumar described his troubles with the assertion in http://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/2016-September/030839.html According to http://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/2016-September/030851.html he apparently solved his problem by commenting the