Re: [zeromq-dev] Felix Geisendörfer's "hack", C4 process

2013-03-21 Thread Pieter Hintjens
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Charles Remes wrote: > So, put me down as another supporter for this idea. OK, it's decided... :-) The C4.1 protocol is still in draft state so if there are changes to make, now's the time. I've updated the zeromq.org site to point to the new RFC. -Pieter _

Re: [zeromq-dev] Felix Geisendörfer's "hack", C4 process

2013-03-21 Thread Charles Remes
I think this is a fantastic idea. One of the other open source projects where I contribute (github.com/rubinius) has had a similar policy in place for the last several years. The project literally has over 100 committers. Their idea was that if you create even one patch (or pull request) that is

Re: [zeromq-dev] Felix Geisendörfer's "hack", C4 process

2013-03-21 Thread Ian Barber
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Pieter Hintjens wrote: > > "Thanks for your pull request. Would you like to join the Maintainers' > team so you can also help review and merge other peoples' pull > requests? If so, could you read http://rfc.zeromq.org/spec:22 and > confirm that you understand this

Re: [zeromq-dev] Felix Geisendörfer's "hack", C4 process

2013-03-21 Thread Pieter Hintjens
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Ian Barber wrote: > As long as the rules in Felix's post are followed (e.g. for meaningful > patches, with accounts that have some rep) I think that's a good idea. We > should communicate the C4 principles, primarily so that people don't just > commit directly to

Re: [zeromq-dev] Felix Geisendörfer's "hack", C4 process

2013-03-21 Thread Ondrej Kupka
Hi, On Mar 20, 2013, at 3:34 PM, Pieter Hintjens wrote: > Hi, > > You might have seen Felix's "pull request hack": > http://felixge.de/2013/03/11/the-pull-request-hack.html > > We've been using something similar (C4) in libzmq and other projects > for a while. > > Do people have opinion on whe

Re: [zeromq-dev] Felix Geisendörfer's "hack", C4 process

2013-03-21 Thread Ian Barber
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Pieter Hintjens wrote: > Hi, > > You might have seen Felix's "pull request hack": > http://felixge.de/2013/03/11/the-pull-request-hack.html > > We've been using something similar (C4) in libzmq and other projects > for a while. > > Do people have opinion on whethe

[zeromq-dev] Felix Geisendörfer's "hack", C4 process

2013-03-20 Thread Pieter Hintjens
Hi, You might have seen Felix's "pull request hack": http://felixge.de/2013/03/11/the-pull-request-hack.html We've been using something similar (C4) in libzmq and other projects for a while. Do people have opinion on whether we're enjoying C4, and whether it would be good to add contributors to