Re: [zeromq-dev] Big Latencies

2012-02-16 Thread Pasi Mankinen
Aja Walker wrote: > Hi all! > > I posted this question about a week ago, but it was fairly long-winded, and > there was some other deep, heated discussion going on so I thought I'd give > it one more shot. I hope I'm not offending the etiquette of the mailing list > by re-posting, but if so

Re: [zeromq-dev] Big Latencies

2012-02-13 Thread Pieter Hintjens
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 3:01 AM, Aja Walker wrote: > Why am I > not seeing latencies across a whole range?  Why does it jump all the > way up to exactly 10 milliseconds?  Is that just an artifact of > Windows' thread scheduling?  Should I not worry about it so much? It sounds like it's Windows. I

Re: [zeromq-dev] Big Latencies

2012-02-13 Thread Aja Walker
Pieter Hintjens imatix.com> writes: > Bad latencies are usually due to contention over CPU. Windows > typically is much worse at this than Linux. Check what's running, try > killing anything that looks greedy. And you also need to make sure > your box has enough cores, which is one per 0MQ thread

Re: [zeromq-dev] Big Latencies

2012-02-11 Thread Pieter Hintjens
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 2:00 AM, Aja Walker wrote: > Briefly, I'm occasionally seeing big, as in 10 milliseconds, end-to-end > latencies  on my Windows 7 machine, but not on my Linux machine. No-one minds if you repost important questions. Bad latencies are usually due to contention over CPU.

[zeromq-dev] Big Latencies

2012-02-11 Thread Aja Walker
Hi all! I posted this question about a week ago, but it was fairly long-winded, and there was some other deep, heated discussion going on so I thought I'd give it one more shot. I hope I'm not offending the etiquette of the mailing list by re-posting, but if so, my apologies, and I won't do it