No real preference between google groups or mailman TBH.
-Trev
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 9:06 AM, Dinu Gherman
wrote:
> I just got a reply from MailmanLists support saying they plan to introduce
> Mailman 3 this year, without giving a date, though.
>
> --
> Sent on the move.
> Von unterwegs gesende
I just got a reply from MailmanLists support saying they plan to introduce
Mailman 3 this year, without giving a date, though.
--
Sent on the move.
Von unterwegs gesendet.
> Am 19.04.2016 um 13:54 schrieb Brian Knox :
>
> Excellent. +1 for staying with mailman then.
>
>> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 a
Excellent. +1 for staying with mailman then.
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 5:21 AM, Kevin Sapper
wrote:
> Staying with Mailman is indeed the better choice. Even though I like
> Google groups they don't have an option the migrate away from it which is a
> deal breaker IMO.
> Regarding helping out Ewen
Staying with Mailman is indeed the better choice. Even though I like Google
groups they don't have an option the migrate away from it which is a deal
breaker IMO.
Regarding helping out Ewen I gladly volunteer.
2016-04-19 5:30 GMT+02:00 Indradhanush Gupta :
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 8:44 AM, P
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
> OK, we need a small set of admins, who can work with my friend Ewen
> McNeill, who has kept archives over the years, to migrate to mailmanlists
> and then manage the lists (zeromq-announce is #2). Justin, it's your baby.
> Thank you.
>
Thi
OK, we need a small set of admins, who can work with my friend Ewen
McNeill, who has kept archives over the years, to migrate to mailmanlists
and then manage the lists (zeromq-announce is #2). Justin, it's your baby.
Thank you.
On 19 Apr 2016 05:10, "Pieter Hintjens" wrote:
Justin, that is a grea
Justin, that is a great proposal, thank you for finding it. I'd prefer
keeping mailman, for familiarity.
On 19 Apr 2016 04:36, "Justin Karneges" wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> I spoke with MailmanLists and they are willing to host the ZeroMQ
> mailing list for free. All they ask for is a link on the mai
Hey folks,
I spoke with MailmanLists and they are willing to host the ZeroMQ
mailing list for free. All they ask for is a link on the mailing list
page. If you'd prefer the list remain Mailman-based and simply don't
want to host it, then I'd say this is the best the way to go. They'll
import archi
Jim Idle writes:
I'm a nay on Google Groups. As seen with SourceForge, sometimes the
priorities of companies change. This is especially true for a publically
traded company.
The price points of https://www.mailmanhost.com/pricing/ seem better
than http://www.mailmanlists.net/ but I have no perso
I'm ok with Google Groups as long I'll still receive all posts as mail
(which should be possible as others have noted).
Archive migration is a must have, seems also be possible.
What would be Plan B if in the future if Google decides to shutdown Google
Groups? This has happened in the past, even
On Fri, 2016-04-15 at 14:53 +0800, Jim Idle wrote:
> > On 14.04.2016 09:41, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
> > >> So an added criteria for any new platform is ability to import our
> > archives.
> > >>
> > >> Free is a plus iff the hosting business is long term reliable.
> > >>
> > >> Conventional email in
> On 14.04.2016 09:41, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
> >> So an added criteria for any new platform is ability to import our
> archives.
> >>
> >> Free is a plus iff the hosting business is long term reliable.
> >>
> >> Conventional email interface is a plus.
> >>
>
https://developers.google.com/admin-sd
I have to take back my vote for librelist. By chance I read some Mails
from Flask (a python web-framework) which used to host their
mailing-lists there and decided to move to mail.python.org. Turns out
librelist didn't use mailman and some users were unable to subscribe to
the list, while Zed S
You just add your email address to the google list - you don't actually
need a Google account. Thre is really no difference to now.
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 5:46 PM, Jeff Shanab wrote:
> I am also a mostly silent lurker and will probably not follow a google
> group. :-(
>
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 a
I'm in favor of Google groups, relative to the alternatives.
On Thursday, April 14, 2016, Greg Young wrote:
> Google groups is a mediocre solution given all the alternatives but
> its also quite commonly used so most people are willing to deal with
> its warts. The history of the group would be
Google groups is a mediocre solution given all the alternatives but
its also quite commonly used so most people are willing to deal with
its warts. The history of the group would be important to bring over
if possible (I do not know of an api for bringing it over).
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 1:45 AM,
On 14 Apr 2016, at 08:41, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
> So an added criteria for any new platform is ability to import our archives.
>
> Free is a plus iff the hosting business is long term reliable.
>
> Conventional email interface is a plus.
Additional criterion (satisfied by Google Groups and m
Also a 'nay' on Google Groups from me.
And I also concur with Lionel Orry: Librelist is just awesome.
Personally I've had the best mailing list experience with lists hosted
their - although that might just say something about the quality of the
projects hosted there.
Afaik it also uses mailman an
On 14 Apr 2016, at 10:46, Jeff Shanab wrote:
> I am also a mostly silent lurker and will probably not follow a google group.
> :-(
I've no particular beef for or against Google Groups, but it is entirely
possible
to follow them like a normal mailing list. The signup feature is hidden a
lit
I am also a mostly silent lurker and will probably not follow a google
group. :-(
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 3:05 AM, Dinu Gherman
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm a silent lurker here, but I would most likely stop following this list
> after a move to google groups. I don't like imposing the use of an account
So an added criteria for any new platform is ability to import our archives.
Free is a plus iff the hosting business is long term reliable.
Conventional email interface is a plus.
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Indradhanush Gupta
wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Jim Idle wrote:
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Jim Idle wrote:
> Also usually a lurker here, but I am all in favor of Google Groups.
> Generally much better than the mailing list software. Can be a change for
> some people of course. But +1 from me for what it's worth.
>
> Jim
>
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 3:05
Also usually a lurker here, but I am all in favor of Google Groups.
Generally much better than the mailing list software. Can be a change for
some people of course. But +1 from me for what it's worth.
Jim
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Dinu Gherman
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm a silent lurker here, b
Hi!
I'm a silent lurker here, but I would most likely stop following this list
after a move to google groups. I don't like imposing the use of an account
already connecting to lots of data where any email address anywhere would be
just what is needed. Sure, you can user other identities, but th
14 April, 2016 01:11:10
> > Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] Moving list to Google groups?
>
> > If you like Mailman, I suggest http://www.mailmanlists.net/ . It's
> > affordable, and the admins are responsive and helpful. I recently
> > started using it on one of my li
; To: zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
> Sent: Thursday, 14 April, 2016 01:11:10
> Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] Moving list to Google groups?
> If you like Mailman, I suggest http://www.mailmanlists.net/ . It's
> affordable, and the admins are responsive and helpful. I recently
> started using it on
If you like Mailman, I suggest http://www.mailmanlists.net/ . It's
affordable, and the admins are responsive and helpful. I recently
started using it on one of my lists.
Google groups is decent. I use it on a couple of my other lists. The
Google account stuff is a little obnoxious but it's hard to
I'm not averse to google groups, in that it is low friction / low
maintenance - and I always hesitate to suggest self hosted / higher
friction / higher maintenance solutions unless I'm willing to implement and
maintain them myself.
Brian
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 6:45 PM, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
>
Hi all,
I'd like to raise this question for discussion. The problem is that
zeromq-dev is running on an iMatix server, and I'd like to remove
iMatix infrastructure from our community, over time. It's a matter of
long term sustainability.
(Apart from the list, iMatix also hosts downloads.zeromq.or
29 matches
Mail list logo
