Hi Eric,
this is a great proposal and I'm sure this is going to help administrators
a lot.
One small question below:
Any property which contains a colon (':') is defined as a 'user
property'. The name can contain alphanumeric characters, plus the
following special characters: ':', '-', '.',
Hi,
I'm trying ZFS on my laptop (Solaris 10 6/06 installed), I want to assign 2
slices for using ZFS. But when I type format, I got drive type unknown
message.
Although prtvtoc can give the drive type info, but I couldn't set the drive
type because the root filesystem is mounted on the
Xinfeng Liu stated:
Hi,
I'm trying ZFS on my laptop (Solaris 10 6/06 installed), I want to assign 2
slices for using ZFS. But when I type format, I got drive type unknown
message.
You've probably got all the disk over to solaris and have things mounted.
To play around with zfs on a
we give the right to add folder to user foo.(this user can not delete anything
as a default) After that we give the right create file.And then user foo gains
delete everthing. How come is it possible.
Even though we add another rule like 0:user:foo:delete_child/delete:deny.
Again it does not
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 09:36:20AM +0200, Constantin Gonzalez Schmitz wrote:
the example suggests that properties may be case-insensitive. Is that the case
(sorry for the pun)? If so, that should be noted in the user defined property
definition just for clarity.
Good point. The property
Hi,
I'm plan to build home server that will host my svn repository, fileserver,
mailserver and webserver.
This is my plan..
I have an old dell precision 420 dual 933Mhz pIII cpus. Inside this i have one
scsi 9.1G hdd and 2 80G ide hdds. I am going to install solaris 10 on the scsi
drive and
Here are some comments received recently regarding Legato and ZFS:
From the 7.3.1 release supplement manual
Restrictions associated with the ZFS file system (LGTpa88264)
The following are restrictions associated with the ZFS file system:
Only an Administrator with full access to ZFS directories
I can't be specific with my reply to the second question, as I've never done
it, but do a search for re-silvering. It is a functionality that is supposed
to be there.
As to the first question, absolutely! I have upgraded my internal server twice,
and both times, I was able to see the old ZFS
Hello,
Is there an equivalent of the command quot - summarize file system
ownership
(/usr/sbin/quot - ../lib/fs/ufs/quot) working with ZFS ?
It seems that this command is only working on UFS file systems
Thanks in advance for your answers,
Regards,
David
--
David
ethan gunword wrote:
we give the right to add folder to user foo.(this user can not delete anything
as a default) After that we give the right create file.And then user foo gains
delete everthing. How come is it possible.
Even though we add another rule like
Ben Short wrote:
Hi,
I'm plan to build home server that will host my svn repository, fileserver, mailserver and webserver.
This is my plan..
I have an old dell precision 420 dual 933Mhz pIII cpus. Inside this i have one
scsi 9.1G hdd and 2 80G ide hdds. I am going to install solaris 10 on
Hi,
What i dont know is what happens if the boot disk dies? can i replace
is, install solaris again and get it to see the zfs mirror?
As I understand it, this be possible, but I haven't tried it and I'm
not an expert Solaris admin. Some ZFS info is stored in a persistent
file on your
I did a little bit of digging, and didn't turn up any known issues. Any insite
would be appreciated.
Basically I replicated a zfs snapshot from a version2 storage pool into a
version3 pool and it seems to have corrupted the version3 pool. At the time of
the error both pools were running on
Can you send the output of this D script while running 'zfs list'?
#!/sbin/dtrace -s
zfs_ioc_snapshot_list_next:entry
{
trace(stringof(args[0]-zc_name));
}
zfs_ioc_snapshot_list_next:return
{
trace(arg1);
}
- Eric
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 09:27:36AM -0700, Shane Milton wrote:
Dick Davies wrote:
On 17/08/06, Lori Alt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dick Davies wrote:
That's excellent news Lori, thanks to everyone who's working
on this. Are you planning to use a single pool,
or an 'os pool/application pool' split?
Thus I think of the most important split as the
On 18/08/06, Lori Alt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, zfs boot will be supported on both x86 and sparc. Sparc's
OBP, and various x86 BIOS's both have restrictions on the devices
that can be accessed at boot time, so we need to limit the
devices in a root pool on both architectures.
Gotcha. I
Lori Alt wrote:
No, zfs boot will be supported on both x86 and sparc. Sparc's
OBP, and various x86 BIOS's both have restrictions on the devices
that can be accessed at boot time, so we need to limit the
devices in a root pool on both architectures.
Hi Lori.
Can you expand a bit on the
Torrey McMahon wrote:
Lori Alt wrote:
No, zfs boot will be supported on both x86 and sparc. Sparc's
OBP, and various x86 BIOS's both have restrictions on the devices
that can be accessed at boot time, so we need to limit the
devices in a root pool on both architectures.
Hi Lori.
Can you
Torrey McMahon wrote:
Lori Alt wrote:
No, zfs boot will be supported on both x86 and sparc. Sparc's
OBP, and various x86 BIOS's both have restrictions on the devices
that can be accessed at boot time, so we need to limit the
devices in a root pool on both architectures.
Hi Lori.
Can
Lori said:
The limitation is mainly about the *number* of disks
that can be accessed at one time.
...
But with straight mirroring, there's no such problem
because any disk in the mirror can supply all of the
disk blocks needed to boot.
Does that mean that these restrictions will go away
Hello David,
Friday, August 18, 2006, 5:39:31 PM, you wrote:
DDB On 8/18/06, Ben Short [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm plan to build home server that will host my svn repository, fileserver,
mailserver and webserver.
This is my plan..
I have an old dell precision 420 dual 933Mhz pIII cpus.
Hello Ben,
Friday, August 18, 2006, 4:36:45 PM, you wrote:
BS What i dont know is what happens if the boot disk dies? can i
BS replace is, install solaris again and get it to see the zfs mirror?
BS Also what happens if one of the ide drives fails? can i plug
BS another one in and run some zfs
Srivastava, Sanjaya wrote:
I have been seeing data corruption on the ZFS filesystem. Here are
some details. The machine is running s10 on X86 platform with a single
160Gb SATA disk. (root on s0 and zfs on s7)
I'd wager that it is a hardware problem. Personally, I've had less than
Hello Sanjaya,
Friday, August 18, 2006, 7:50:21 PM, you wrote:
Hi,
I have been seeing data corruption on the ZFS filesystem. Here are some details. The machine is running s10 on X86 platform with a single 160Gb SATA disk. (root on s0 and zfs on s7)
Well you have a ZFS without
On August 10, 2006 6:04:38 PM -0700 eric kustarz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you're doing HA-ZFS (which is SunCluster 3.2 - only available in beta right
now),
Is the 3.2 beta publicly available? I can only locate 3.1.
-frank
___
zfs-discuss
Frank,
The SC 3.2 beta maybe closed but I'm forwarding your request to Eric
Redmond.
Thanks,
George
Frank Cusack wrote:
On August 10, 2006 6:04:38 PM -0700 eric kustarz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
If you're doing HA-ZFS (which is SunCluster 3.2 - only available in
beta right now),
Is the
Thanks for the reply.
If a put a SATA Raid card (ARC-1110, http://www.areca.us/products/html/pcix-sata.htm)the
problem disappers.
...Sanjaya
From: Robert Milkowski
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 18, 2006 11:59
AMTo: Srivastava, SanjayaCc:
Thank you Sean. That would be wonderful using files.
-Xinfeng
Sean McGrath - Sun Microsystems Ireland ??:
Xinfeng Liu stated:
Hi,
I'm trying ZFS on my laptop (Solaris 10 6/06 installed), I want to assign 2 slices for using ZFS. But when I type format, I got drive type unknown message.
28 matches
Mail list logo
