[zfs-discuss] Re: tracking error to file

2007-02-18 Thread Davin Milun
I have one that looks like this: pool: preplica-1 state: ONLINE status: One or more devices has experienced an error resulting in data corruption. Applications may be affected. action: Restore the file in question if possible. Otherwise restore the entire pool from backup. s

[zfs-discuss] Re: [osol-help] How to recover from "rm *"?

2007-02-18 Thread Dennis Clarke
> On Sun, 18 Feb 2007, Calvin Liu wrote: > >> I want to run command "rm Dis*" in a folder but mis-typed a space in it >> so it became "rm Dis *". Unfortunately I had pressed the return button >> before I noticed the mistake. So you all know what happened... :( :( :( > > Ouch! > >> How can I get th

[zfs-discuss] Re: Re: Need help making lsof work with ZFS

2007-02-18 Thread Anantha N. Srirama
I think so. After all there are features shipped which are not fully baked/guranteed like the send/receive. Isn't shipping the header files better than letting developers guess their structure and possibly make mistakes? Of course the developer can compile against OpenSolaris source but far easi

Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: ZFS with SAN Disks and mutipathing

2007-02-18 Thread Torrey McMahon
Richard Elling wrote: JS wrote: I'm using ZFS on both EMC and Pillar arrays with PowerPath and MPxIO, respectively. Both work fine - the only caveat is to drop your sd_queue to around 20 or so, otherwise you can run into an ugly display of bus resets. This is sd_max_throttle or ssd_max_throt

[zfs-discuss] Re: Re: SPEC SFS benchmark of NFS/ZFS/B56 - please help to improve it!

2007-02-18 Thread Leon Koll
Robert wrote: > Before jumping to any conclusions - first try to > eliminate nfs and do readdirs locally - I guess that would be quite fast. > Then check on a client (dtrace) the time distribution of nfs requests > and sends us results. We used this test program that is doing readdirs and can be

Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: Need help making lsof work with ZFS

2007-02-18 Thread Adam Leventhal
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 01:56:33PM -0700, Matthew Ahrens wrote: > These files are not shipped with Solaris 10. You can find them in > opensolaris: usr/src/uts/common/fs/zfs/sys/ > > The interfaces in these files are not supported, and may change without > notice at any time. Even if they're no

Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: ZFS with SAN Disks and mutipathing

2007-02-18 Thread Richard Elling
JS wrote: I'm using ZFS on both EMC and Pillar arrays with PowerPath and MPxIO, respectively. Both work fine - the only caveat is to drop your sd_queue to around 20 or so, otherwise you can run into an ugly display of bus resets. This is sd_max_throttle or ssd_max_throttle. The problem is tha

[zfs-discuss] Re: ZFS with SAN Disks and mutipathing

2007-02-18 Thread Leon Koll
Have you tried PowerPath/EMC and MPxIO/Pillar on the same host? This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Re: [zfs-discuss] Google paper on disk reliability

2007-02-18 Thread Chris Ridd
On 18/2/07 4:56, "Akhilesh Mritunjai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Folks > > I believe that the word would have gone around already, Google engineers have > published a paper on disk reliability. It might supplement the ZFS FMA > integration and well - all the numerous debates on spares etc et