I think I advised you on the solaris forums to try some tests with two separate
ufs filesystems on the luns in question. Just to check that your hardware can
actually do what you think it can.
One other issue that might be confusing things. I believe the AMS is a non
symmetric array so LUN's
Hello !
Can you please share your experiences with ZFS deployment for Oracle
databases for production usage ?
Why did you choose to deploy the database on ZFS ?
What features of ZFS are you using ?
What tuning was done during ZFS setup ?
How big are the databases ?
Thank you,
Jay
Hardware Supermicro X7DAE (AHCI BIOS) dual Intel Woodcrest processors, 6 x
Western Digital Raptor SATA drives.
I have installed b62 running 64 bit succesfully on a PATA drive. The BIOS is
configured to access the SATA drives in native mode using hte AHCI Bios.
I have 6 SATA II drives accessed
Peter,
Can you send the 'zpool status -x' output after your reboot. I suspect
that the pool error is occurring early in the boot and later the devices
are all available and the pool is brought into an online state.
Take a look at:
*6401126 ZFS DE should verify that diagnosis is still valid
# zpool status -x
pool: mtf
state: UNAVAIL
status: One or more devices could not be opened. There are insufficient
replicas for the pool to continue functioning.
action: Attach the missing device and online it using 'zpool online'.
see: http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-D3
scrub:
Peter Goodman wrote:
# zpool status -x
pool: mtf
state: UNAVAIL
status: One or more devices could not be opened. There are insufficient
replicas for the pool to continue functioning.
action: Attach the missing device and online it using 'zpool online'.
see:
Hi Rainer,
This is a long thread and I wasn't commenting on your previous
replies regarding mirror manipulation. If I was, I would have done
so directly. :-)
I saw the export-a-pool-to-remove-a-disk-solution described in
a Sun doc.
My point and (I agree with your points below) is that making a
On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 01:20:45PM -0400, Christine Tran wrote:
Jens Elkner wrote:
So please: http://learn.to/quote
We apparently need to learn German as well. -CT
Not really. There is also a Dutch version ;-)
For your convinience (and all people, which can't find the English |
Dutch
Hi,
OS : Solaris 10 11/06
zpool list doesn't reflect pool usage stats instantly. Why?
# ls -l
total 209769330
-rw--T 1 root root 107374182400 Apr 30 14:28 deleteme
# zpool list
NAMESIZEUSED AVAILCAP HEALTH ALTROOT
wo136G
I also downloaded the .iso file, burned it, and started the install process. I
followed these instructions for creating the profile.
[i]Here's a quick-and-dirty way to do a profile-driven install:
1. Boot your system off the net or from the DVD in the usual manner.
2. Select Interactive
zpool list doesn't reflect pool usage stats instantly. Why?
# ls -l
total 209769330
-rw--T 1 root root 107374182400 Apr 30 14:28 deleteme
# zpool list
NAMESIZEUSED AVAILCAP HEALTH ALTROOT
wo136G100G 36.0G73%
zpool list doesn't reflect pool usage stats instantly. Why?
This is no different to how UFS behaves.
If you rm a file, this uses the system call unlink(2) to do the work which is
asynchronous.
In other words, unlink(2) almost immediately returns a successful return code to
rm (which can
The only big difference I see between what you did and what I did was I
didn't have the cluster line.
On reboot, mine said something like 'Solaris nv_b62'
Is it possible there were any errors while it was installing?
If it generates a log during install, maybe you can ftp it away before the
no errors that i could see. I'm going to re-try it w/o the cluster line. i'm
not sure if that line is required or not.
div id=jive-html-wrapper-div
The only big difference I see between what you did
and what I did was I didn't have the cluster
line.brOn reboot, mine said something like
zpool list doesn't reflect pool usage stats instantly. Why?
This is no different to how UFS behaves.
It is different now (although I spent about 5 minutes looking for an old
bug that would point to *when* the UFS change went in, I wasn't able to
find one).
If you rm a file, this uses the
On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 16:53 -0700, Darren Dunham wrote:
zpool list doesn't reflect pool usage stats instantly. Why?
This is no different to how UFS behaves.
It is different now (although I spent about 5 minutes looking for an old
bug that would point to *when* the UFS change went in, I
I tried it and it worked great. Even cloned my boot environment, and BFU'd the
clone and it seemed to work (minus a few unrelated annoyances I haven't tracked
down yet). I'm quite excited about the possibilities :)
I am wondering though, is it possible to skip the creation of the pool and
17 matches
Mail list logo
