Matt,
Thank you for your reply. I like to keep the raidz groups with the same
number of disks but it is not always that easily to have the numbers
work out way.
David
On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 14:49 -0700, Matthew Ahrens wrote:
> David Smith wrote:
> > What are your thoughts or recommendations on
Orvar Korvar wrote:
> I am using 4 SATA II drives, with this card (see the comments) which
> got detected by Solaris automatically:
> http://napobo3.blogspot.com/2006/04/sata2-under-b36.html
On there you posted:
> However, I get very slow read/write perfomance. I have 4 samsung
> 500GB each shoul
David McDaniel stated:
< An an application currently stores date in /opt/stuff. The application cant
be changed to expect its data in another path. But it could benefit from some
ZFS capabilities.
< So, ideally I could create a pool and zfs, and then mount that at
/opt/stuff. I know I could pr
David Smith wrote:
> What are your thoughts or recommendations on having a zpool made up of
> raidz groups of different sizes? Are there going to be performance issues?
It should be fine. Under some circumstances the performance could be similar
to a pool with all raidz groups of the smallest s
I am using 4 SATA II drives, with this card (see the comments) which got
detected by Solaris automatically:
http://napobo3.blogspot.com/2006/04/sata2-under-b36.html
I understand that my 32bit CPU is the limiting factor? But that seems a bit
strange I think. A [EMAIL PROTECTED] should be able to
An an application currently stores date in /opt/stuff. The application cant be
changed to expect its data in another path. But it could benefit from some ZFS
capabilities.
So, ideally I could create a pool and zfs, and then mount that at /opt/stuff.
I know I could presumably make /opt/stuff a
After a cup of French coffee, I feel strong enough to recommend :-)
David Smith wrote:
> What are your thoughts or recommendations on having a zpool made up of
> raidz groups of different sizes? Are there going to be performance issues?
It is more complicated and, in general, more complicated is
This is good news, thank you for the blog!
If I may ask a couple of questions to the community on the topic of OLTP
workload and ZFS...
1. When evaluating ZFS for our Oracle systems (heavy 8K uncached
workload), our DBAs used the ZFS vs. VxFS whitepaper
http://www.sun.com/software/whitepapers/so
Here's some info on the changes we've made to the vdev cache (in
part) to help database performance:
http://blogs.sun.com/erickustarz/entry/vdev_cache_improvements_to_help
enjoy your properly inflated I/O,
eric
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss
Rob Nelson wrote:
> OK - here's some info for those of you just starting out with zfs from the
> coding/building level. I struggled for many days walking down the path of
> install specific snv_xx release -> build code of snv_xx release with nightly
> -> install kernel only with cap eye Install
Hello Systems,
Thursday, July 19, 2007, 9:02:06 AM, you wrote:
RPSASPSP> Hi,
RPSASPSP> I have a question concerning booting Solaris (SPARC/X64) with some ZFS
RPSASPSP> storage pools/datasets created and mounted.
RPSASPSP> Where from Solaris/ZFS knows which storage pools/datasets should be
RPSA
Hello Eric,
Wednesday, July 18, 2007, 9:37:21 PM, you wrote:
ES> On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 03:06:07PM -0500, Albert Chin wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 01:00:22PM -0700, Eric Schrock wrote:
>> > You can find these at:
>> >
>> > http://www.umem.com/Umem_NVRAM_Cards.html
>> >
>> > And the one Ne
Hi,
I have a question concerning booting Solaris (SPARC/X64) with some ZFS
storage pools/datasets created and mounted.
Where from Solaris/ZFS knows which storage pools/datasets should be
mounted after reboot???
ZFS is not using at all /etc/vfstab configuration file (I exclude here
case where
13 matches
Mail list logo
