Peter Schuller wrote:
>> Is there a specific reason why you need to do the caching at the DB
>> level instead of the file system? I'm really curious as i've got
>> conflicting data on why people do this. If i get more data on real
>> reasons on why we shouldn't cache at the file system, the
This one might be better in the help forum/list :)
You will probably want to use the latest SXDE for that instead of Solaris 10.
It is a recent well-tested SXCE which is much newer than Solaris 10. Depending
on how good the Super Project Indiana OpenSolaris Milestone 1 Turbo turns out
at the
Hi all,
I have been reading ZFS discussion for a while now and I'm planning a small
file server (to be used by only a few people). I'm fairly new to Solaris and
OpenSolaris, and I'm thinking of using Solaris 10 08/07.
I have a few questions I haven't been able to figure out yet, and would be
g
On 30/09/2007, William Papolis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK,
>
> I guess using this ...
>
> set md:mirrored_root_flag=1
>
> for Solaris Volume Manager (SVM) is not supported and could cause problems.
>
> I guess it's back to my first idea ...
>
> With 2 disks, setup three SDR's (State Datab
Hi
What patch has obsoleted 122660-10?
run:
patchadd -p |grep 122660-10
Enda
Bruce Shaw wrote:
>> 122660-10 does not have any issues that I am aware of. It is only
>>
> obsolete, not withdrawn. Additionally, it appears that the circular
> patch dependency is by design if you read this BugI
Pawel,
Is this a problem with ZFS trying to open the device twice?
Richard,
Yes a scrub should fix the device. One of zfs' faetures is ease of
administration. It seems to defy logic that a scrub does not fix all devices,
if possible. Why make it any harder for the admin?
Cheers.
This me
provided 3310 cache does not induce silent block corruption when
writing to disks
s.
On 10/5/07, Vincent Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So I went ahead and loaded 10u4 on a pair of V210 units.
>
> I am going to set this nocacheflush option and cross my fingers and see how
> it goes.
>
> I have
>>
>> The question of why to have different storage pools has still not
>> been
>> satisfactorily addressed. Methinks people are still confusing
>> pools and
>> data sets.
>>
>
> Is it possible to create a pool called rootpool made up for example
> of mirror c1t0d0 c2t0d0
> then add 4 disks
