This looks like a bug in the sd driver (SCSI).
Does this look familiar to anyway from the sd group?
eric
On Oct 10, 2007, at 10:30 AM, Claus Guttesen wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Just migrated to zfs on opensolaris. I copied data to the server using
> rsync and got this message:
>
> Oct 10 17:24:04 zetta ^
On Oct 10, 2007, at 11:23 AM, Bernhard Duebi wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I tested the following scenario:
>
> I have two machine attached to the same SAN LUN.
> Both machines run Solaris 10 Update 4.
> Machine A is active with zpool01 imported.
> Machine B is inactive.
> Machine A crashes.
> Machi
>
> That all said - we don't have a simple dd benchmark for random
> seeking.
Feel free to try out randomread.f and randomwrite.f - or combine them
into your own new workload to create a random read and write workload.
eric
___
zfs-discuss mailing
Hi everybody,
I tested the following scenario:
I have two machine attached to the same SAN LUN.
Both machines run Solaris 10 Update 4.
Machine A is active with zpool01 imported.
Machine B is inactive.
Machine A crashes.
Machine B imports zpool01
Machine A comes back
Now the problem is, that when
On Oct 10, 2007, at 2:56 AM, Thomas Liesner wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
>> Are you talking about the documentation at:
>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/filebench
>> or:
>> http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/performance/filebench/
>> and:
>> http://www.solarisinternals.com/wiki/index.php/FileBench
On Oct 10, 2007, at 8:41 AM, Luke Lonergan wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On 10/10/07 12:50 AM, "eric kustarz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Since you were already using filebench, you could use the
>> 'singlestreamwrite.f' and 'singlestreamread.f' workloads (with
>> nthreads set to 20, iosize set to 12
Hi.
Just migrated to zfs on opensolaris. I copied data to the server using
rsync and got this message:
Oct 10 17:24:04 zetta ^Mpanic[cpu1]/thread=ff0007f1bc80:
Oct 10 17:24:04 zetta genunix: [ID 683410 kern.notice] BAD TRAP:
type=e (#pf Page fault) rp=ff0007f1b640 addr=fffecd873000
Oc
Hi Eric,
On 10/10/07 12:50 AM, "eric kustarz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since you were already using filebench, you could use the
> 'singlestreamwrite.f' and 'singlestreamread.f' workloads (with
> nthreads set to 20, iosize set to 128k) to achieve the same things.
Yes but once again we see th
I've tried to report this bug through the http://bugs.opensolaris.org/ site
twice. The first time on September 17, 2007 with the title "ZFS Kernel Crash
During Disk Writes (SATA and SCSI)". The second time on September 19, 2007 with
the title "ZFS or Storage Subsystem Crashes when Writing to Dis
I'm not sure. But when I would re-run a scrub, I got the errors at the same
block numbers, which indicated that the disk was really bad. It wouldn't hurt
to make the entry in the /etc/system file, reboot, and then try the scrub
again. If the problem disappears then it is a driver bug.
Gary
Thanks. Looks like I have this bug. Is it a hardware problem combined with a
software problem?
Oct 9 09:35:43 zeta1 sata: [ID 801593 kern.notice] NOTICE: /[EMAIL
PROTECTED],0/pci1022,[EMAIL PROTECTED]/pci11ab,[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Oct 9 09:35:43 zeta1 port 3: device reset
Oct 9 09:35:43 zeta1 s
Walter Faleiro wrote:
> Hi,
> We have implemented a zfs files system for home directories and have
> enabled it with quotas+snapshots. However the snapshots are causing an
> issue with the user quotas. The default snapshot files go under
> ~username/.zfs/snapshot, which is a part of the user fil
> Tell me, is there a way to skip ZFS file system cache or tell me is
> there a way to do direct IO on ZFS file system?
No, currently there is no way to disable file system cache aka ARC in ZFS.
There is a pending RFE though,
6429855 Need way to tell ZFS that caching is a lost cause
Cheer
Hi All,
Any update on this ?
-Masthan D
dudekula mastan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Everybody,
From the last one week so many mails are exchanged on this topic.
I have also one similar issue like this. I will appreciate if any one helps
me on this.
I have an IO
Outside of xen ( it was running in a dom0),the zfs root creation executed
flawlessly.
and it seems that these dma error are caused by xen related isssue :(.
There is an old thread talking about DMA issues on machine with lots of ram
(8gig here.)
Reposting to the Xen mailing list.
This mess
Hi Eric,
>Are you talking about the documentation at:
>http://sourceforge.net/projects/filebench
>or:
>http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/performance/filebench/
>and:
>http://www.solarisinternals.com/wiki/index.php/FileBench
>?
i was talking about the solarisinternals wiki. I can't find any
Since you were already using filebench, you could use the
'singlestreamwrite.f' and 'singlestreamread.f' workloads (with
nthreads set to 20, iosize set to 128k) to achieve the same things.
With the latest version of filebench, you can then use the '-c'
option to compare your results in a nic
17 matches
Mail list logo
