Bart Smaalders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marcus Sundman wrote:
Bart Smaalders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
UTF8 is the answer here. If you care about anything more than
simple ascii and you work in more than a single locale/encoding,
use UTF8. You may not understand the meaning of a filename,
Chris Gilligan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2. in a raidz do all the disks have to be the same size?
Related question:
Does a raidz have to be either only full disks or only slices, or can
it be mixed? E.g., can you do a 3-way raidz with 2 complete disks and
one slice (of equal size as the disks) on
2. in a raidz do all the disks have to be the same size?
Disks don't have to be the same size, but only as much space will be
used
on the larger disks will be used as is available on the smallest disk.
In
other words, there's no benefit to be gained from this approach.
Related question:
Marcus Sundman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joerg Schilling) wrote:
Marcus Sundman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joerg Schilling) wrote:
[...] ISO-8859-1 (the low 8 bits of UNOICODE) [...]
Unicode is not an encoding, but you probably mean the low 8
Bart Smaalders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The OS has no way of merging your various encodings. If I create a
directory, and have people from around the world create a file
in that directory named after themselves in their own character sets,
what should I see when I invoke:
% ls -l | less
We are lucky to have Darren Moffatt, Sun Senior Staff Engineer and Project Lead
for the ZFS lofi Crypto On Disk Encryption OpenSolaris project speaking at
the next LOSUG meeting on 19th March 2008.
For full details, take a look at http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/losug/
don't forget to
Do you happen to know where programs in (Open)Solaris look when they
want to know how to encode text to be used in a filename? Is it
LC_CTYPE?
In general, they don't. Command-line utilities just use the sequence of
bytes entered by the user. GUI-based software does as well, but the
encoding
Anton B. Rang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you happen to know where programs in (Open)Solaris look when they
want to know how to encode text to be used in a filename? Is it
LC_CTYPE?
In general, they don't. Command-line utilities just use the sequence
of bytes entered by the user.
Hi. We have a hard drive failing in one of our production servers.
The server has two drives, mirrored. It is split between UFS with SVM, and ZFS.
Both drives are setup as follows. The drives are c0t0d0 and c0t1d0. c0t1d0 is
the failing drive.
slice 0 - 3.00GB UFS (root partition)
slice 1
Chris,
You can replace the disks one at a time with larger disks. No problem.
You can also add another raidz vdev, but you can't add disks to an
existing raidz vdev.
See the sample output below. This might not solve all your problems,
but should give you some ideas...
Cindy
# zpool create
Marcus Sundman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So, you see, there is no way for me to use filenames intelligibly unless
their encodings are knowable. (In fact I'm quite surprised that zfs
doesn't (and even can't) know the encoding(s) of filenames. Usually Sun
seems to make relatively sane design
Chris,
You can replace the disks one at a time with larger
disks. No problem.
You can also add another raidz vdev, but you can't
add disks to an
existing raidz vdev.
See the sample output below. This might not solve all
your problems,
but should give you some ideas...
Cindy
Cindy,
Chris Gilligan wrote:
ok maybe i should rewrite my question in a better way.
No, the reason nobody answered was that this a frequent FAQ,
second only to CR 4852783 reduce pool capacity.
Cindy, can we update the opensolaris.org FAQ to include some words
about these two questions?
-- richard
I won't comment on the SVM bits because I haven't used it in many years.
For the ZFS bits you just need to detach it from the zpool, then attach
after you replace the drive.
-- richard
Matt Cohen wrote:
Hi. We have a hard drive failing in one of our production servers.
The server has two
Chris Gilligan wrote:
ok maybe i should rewrite my question in a better
way.
No, the reason nobody answered was that this a
frequent FAQ,
second only to CR 4852783 reduce pool capacity.
Famous last words but i thought i read everything in the FAQ but maybe i missed
it and i want
Chris Gilligan wrote:
Chris Gilligan wrote:
ok maybe i should rewrite my question in a better
way.
No, the reason nobody answered was that this a
frequent FAQ,
second only to CR 4852783 reduce pool capacity.
Famous last words but i thought i read
Chris,
You would need to replace all the disks to see the expanded space.
Otherwise, space on the 1-2 larger disks would be wasted. If
you replace all the disks with larger disks, then yes, the
disk space in the raidz config would be expanded.
A ZFS mirrored config would be more flexible but it
If I do something like this:
zfs snapshot [EMAIL PROTECTED]
zfs send [EMAIL PROTECTED] tank.backup
sleep 86400
zfs rename [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
zfs snapshot [EMAIL PROTECTED]
zfs send -I [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] tank.incr
Am I going to be able to restore the streams?
In general, they don't. Command-line utilities just use the sequence
of bytes entered by the user.
Obviously that depends on the application. A command-line utility that
interprets an normal xml file containing filenames know the characters
but not the bytes. The same goes for
Hi,
I know that is not recommended by Sun
to use ZFS on 32 bits machines but,
what are really the consequences of doing this ?
I have an old Bipro Xeon server (6 GB ram , 6 disks),
and I would like to do a raidz with 4 disks with Solaris 10 update 4.
Thanks,
Ben
20 matches
Mail list logo
