On 07 June, 2008 - Fu Leow sent me these 1,1K bytes:
> On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 4:13 AM, Mario Goebbels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> c1t5d0 was part of a mirror but with c1t4d0 removed it now appears as
> >> a single drive. Is there a way to recover from this by recreating the
> >> mirror with c1
Hello Bill,
Wednesday, June 4, 2008, 12:37:38 AM, you wrote:
BS> I'm pretty sure that this bug is fixed in Solaris 10U5, patch
BS> 127127-11 and 127128-11 (note: 6462690 sd driver should set
BS> SYNC_NV bit when issuing SYNCHRONIZE CACHE to SBC-2 devices).
BS> However, a test system with new 6140
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 4:13 AM, Mario Goebbels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> c1t5d0 was part of a mirror but with c1t4d0 removed it now appears as
>> a single drive. Is there a way to recover from this by recreating the
>> mirror with c1t4d0?
>
> Detaching a drive from a two-way mirror effectively
On Sat, 7 Jun 2008, Mattias Pantzare wrote:
>
> If I need to count useage I can use du. But if you can implement space
> usage info on a per-uid basis you are not far from quota per uid...
That sounds like quite a challenge. UIDs are just numbers and new
ones can appear at any time. Files with
For the cifs side of the house, I think it would be in Sun's best interest
to work with a third party vendor like NTP software. The quota
functionality they provide is far more robust than anything I expect we'll
ever see come directly with zfs. And rightly so... it's what they
specialize in.
ht
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Peter Tribble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
... very big snip ...
> (Although I have to say that, in a previous job, scrapping user quotas
> entirely
> not only resulted in happier users, much less work for the helpdesk, and -
> paradoxically - largely eliminated syste
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Uwe,
>
> Please see pages 55-80 of the ZFS Admin Guide, here:
>
> http://opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/docs/
>
> Basically, the process is to upgrade from nv81 to nv90 by using the
> standard upgrade feature. Then, use lucreate to migrate your UFS root
> file system
Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
> I'm quite new to ZFS. It is so very easy to create new filesystems
> using "zfs create zpool/fs" that sometimes I doubt what to do: create a
> directory (like on ufs) or do a zfs create..
>
> Can somebody give some advise on -when- to use a "normal" directory
> and -when-
>>
>> The problem with that argument is that 10.000 users on one vxfs or UFS
>> filesystem is no problem at all, be it /var/mail or home directories.
>> You don't even need a fast server for that. 10.000 zfs file systems is
>> a problem.
>>
>> So, if it makes you happier, substitute mail with home
Hi Folks,
I'm trying to backup my /export folder to an USB disk by zfs send/receive.
But zfs receive try to mount the dataset to a mountpoint which is already
mounted on the existing zfs system, and failed. see below:
1) zfs list
# zfs list
NAME USED AVAIL REFER
> c1t5d0 was part of a mirror but with c1t4d0 removed it now appears as
> a single drive. Is there a way to recover from this by recreating the
> mirror with c1t4d0?
Detaching a drive from a two-way mirror effectively breaks it up and
turns it into a single drive. That's normal. Just attach it bac
Thanks Marc - I'll run memtest on Monday, and re-seat memory/cpu//cards etc. If
that fails, I'll try moving the devices onto a different SATA controller.
Failing that I'll rebuild from scratch. Failing that, I'll get a new
motherboard!
Ben
This message posted from opensolaris.org
__
On 07 June, 2008 - Dick Hoogendijk sent me these 0,6K bytes:
> I'm quite new to ZFS. It is so very easy to create new filesystems
> using "zfs create zpool/fs" that sometimes I doubt what to do: create a
> directory (like on ufs) or do a zfs create..
>
> Can somebody give some advise on -when- to
On 07 June, 2008 - Fu Leow sent me these 2,0K bytes:
> Hi,
>
> I had a plan to set up a zfs pool with different raid levels but I ran
> into an issue based on some testing I've done in a VM. I have 3x 750
> GB hard drives and 2x 320 GB hard drives available, and I want to set
> up a RAIDZ for the
Weird. I have no idea how you could remove that file (beside destroying the
entire filesystem)...
One other thing I noticed:
NAMESTATE READ WRITE CKSUM
rpool ONLINE 0 0 8
raidz1ONLINE 0 0 8
c0t7d0 ONLINE
I'm quite new to ZFS. It is so very easy to create new filesystems
using "zfs create zpool/fs" that sometimes I doubt what to do: create a
directory (like on ufs) or do a zfs create..
Can somebody give some advise on -when- to use a "normal" directory
and -when- it is better to create a "zpool/fss
Tim wrote:
>
>
>
> **pci or pci-x. Yes, you might see *SOME* loss in speed from a pci
> interface, but let's be honest, there aren't a whole lot of users on
> this list that have the infrastructure to use greater than 100MB/sec who
> are asking this sort of question. A PCI bus should have n
Hi,
I had a plan to set up a zfs pool with different raid levels but I ran
into an issue based on some testing I've done in a VM. I have 3x 750
GB hard drives and 2x 320 GB hard drives available, and I want to set
up a RAIDZ for the 750 GB and mirror for the 320 GB and add it all to
the same pool.
18 matches
Mail list logo
