Hi,
New to OpenSolaris and ZFS...
Wondering about a size difference I see on my newly installed
OpenSolaris system, Homebuilt AMD Phenom system with SATA3 disks...
[code]
jo...@krynn:~$ zpool list
NAME SIZE USED AVAIL CAP HEALTH ALTROOT
rpool 696G 7.67G 688G 1% ONLINE -
zpool 2.72T 135K 2.72T
Tomas Ögren wrote:
On 07 February, 2009 - Johan Andersson sent me these 1,5K bytes:
Hi,
New to OpenSolaris and ZFS...
Wondering about a size difference I see on my newly installed
OpenSolaris system, Homebuilt AMD Phenom system with SATA3 disks...
[code]
jo...@krynn:~$ zpool list
NAME
On Wed, 04 Feb 2009 11:12:55 -0500, Kyle McDonald
kmcdon...@egenera.com wrote:
I jumpstarted my machine with sNV b106, and installed with ZFS root/boot.
It left me at a shell prompt in the JumpStart environment, with my ZFS
root on /a.
I wanted to try out some things that I planned on scripting
FYI, I'm working on a workaround for broken devices.
As you note,
ome disks flat-out lie: you issue the
synchronize-cache command,
they say got it, boss, yet the data is still not on
stable storage.
Why do they do this? Because it performs better.
Well, duh --
ou can make stuff
How do I set the number of copies on a snapshot ? Based on the error
message, I believe that I cannot do so.
I already have a number of clones based on this snapshot, and would
like the snapshot to have more copies now.
For higher redundancy and peace of mind, what alternatives do
From the presentation ZFS - The last word in filesystems, Page 22
In a multi-disk pool, ZFS survives any non-consecutive disk failures
Questions:
If I have a 3 disk RAIDZ with disks A, B and C, then:
- if disk b fails, then will I be able to continue to read data if
disks A and C are
An update:
I'm using VMWare ESX 3.5 and VMWare ESXi 3.5 as the NFS clients.
I'm use zfs set sharenfs=on datapool/vmwarenfs to make that zfs file
system accessible over NFS.
-- Sriram
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 12:07 AM, Sriram Narayanan sriram...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello:
I have the following zfs
On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 19:33, Sriram Narayanan sri...@belenix.org wrote:
How do I set the number of copies on a snapshot ? Based on the error
message, I believe that I cannot do so.
I already have a number of clones based on this snapshot, and would
like the snapshot to have more copies
On February 8, 2009 12:04:22 AM +0530 Sriram Narayanan sri...@belenix.org
wrote:
From the presentation ZFS - The last word in filesystems, Page 22
In a multi-disk pool, ZFS survives any non-consecutive disk failures
Questions:
If I have a 3 disk RAIDZ with disks A, B and C, then:
- if
On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 6:34 PM, Sriram Narayanan sri...@belenix.org wrote:
From the presentation ZFS - The last word in filesystems, Page 22
In a multi-disk pool, ZFS survives any non-consecutive disk failures
Questions:
If I have a 3 disk RAIDZ with disks A, B and C, then:
- if disk
On Sat, February 7, 2009 14:32, Alan.M.Wright wrote:
Also, does this end up taking up extra metadata space compared to not
having to have an ACL entry for each file?
No, ZFS only stores ACLs. It doesn't have or store a separate
representation of the UNIX permissions bits.
So I won't worry
David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
On Sat, February 7, 2009 14:32, Alan.M.Wright wrote:
Also, does this end up taking up extra metadata space compared to not
having to have an ACL entry for each file?
No, ZFS only stores ACLs. It doesn't have or store a separate
representation of the UNIX permissions
This is not a ZFS question. It is an NFS question.
For Solaris NFSv4 clients post-b77, they will follow the mounts, via
a method called mirror mounts. For other NFS clients, the behaviour
will be that which the developers implemented. Please consult the
appropriate NFS client forum for your
This is one of these Doctor - it hurts when I ... and the Doctor
says then don't do that stories. Basically I installed a couple of
1Tb WD Black Caviar drives in a Sun x2200M2 1U server in a ZFS
mirrored boot config - excellent drives - much faster than previous
7,200 RPM drives and the dual
14 matches
Mail list logo
