On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 10:51 -0700, Jeff Haferman wrote:
> We have a SGE array task that we wish to run with elements 1-7.
> Each task generates output and takes roughly 20 seconds to 4 minutes
> of CPU time. We're doing them on a machine with about 144 8-core nodes,
> and we've divvied the
The keynote was given on Wednesday. Any more willingness to discuss
dedup on the list now?
-B
--
Brandon High : bh...@freaks.com
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
> "rl" == Rob Logan writes:
rl> Is there some magic that load balances the 4 SAS ports as this
rl> shows up as one "scsi-bus"?
The LSI card is not SATA framework. I've the impression drive
enumeration and topology is handled by the proprietary firmware on the
card, so it's likely th
Have each node record results locally, and then merge pair-wise until
a single node is left with the final results? If you can do merges
that way while reducing the size of the result set, then that's
probably going to be the most scalable way to generate overall
results.
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 11:43, Adam Sherman wrote:
> On 17-Jul-09, at 1:45 , Will Murnane wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm looking at the LSI SAS3801X because it seems to be what Sun OEMs for
>>> my
>>> X4100s:
>>
>> If you're given the choice (i.e., you have the M2 revision), PCI
>> Express is probably the bus
Hi Laurent,
Yes, you should able to offline a faulty device in a redundant
configuration as long as enough devices are available to keep
the pool redundant.
On my Solaris Nevada system (latest bits), injecting a fault
into a disk in a RAID-Z configuration and then offlining a disk
works as expec
On 17-Jul-09, at 1:45 , Will Murnane wrote:
I'm looking at the LSI SAS3801X because it seems to be what Sun
OEMs for my
X4100s:
If you're given the choice (i.e., you have the M2 revision), PCI
Express is probably the bus to go with. It's basically the same card,
but on a faster bus. But ther
Don't hear about triple-parity RAID that often:
> Author: Adam Leventhal
> Repository: /hg/onnv/onnv-gate
> Latest revision: 17811c723fb4f9fce50616cb740a92c8f6f97651
> Total changesets: 1
> Log message:
> 6854612 triple-parity RAID-Z
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/onnv-notify/2009-July/009
I understand that ZFS in not a native cluster file system that permits
concurrent access to multiple hosts as noted in the ZFS FAQs. In the FAQ it
states that in the long term, it will be investigated. ZFS is an excellent
file system without the clustering feature, but if it had it, it would pu
Hi,
I am just having trouble with my opensolaris in a virtual box. It
refuses to boot with the following crash dump:
panic[cpu0]/thread=d5a3edc0: assertion failed: 0 ==
dmu_buf_hold_array(os, object, offset, size, FALSE, FTAG, &numbufs,
&dbp), file: ../../common/fs/zfs/dmu.c, line: 614
d5a3eb08
10 matches
Mail list logo
