Rob Logan wrote:
I like the original Phenom X3 or X4
we all agree ram is the key to happiness. The debate is what offers the most ECC
ram for the least $. I failed to realize the AM3 cpus accepted UnBuffered ECC
DDR3-1333
like Lynnfield. To use Intel's 6 slots vs AMD 4 slots, one must
Hello,
I'm trying to migrate my data pool to get dedup and compression.
I tried :
# zfs send -RD d...@prededup |zfs receive ezdata/data
it fails in the end with :
cannot receive new filesystem stream: destination 'ezdata/data' exists
must specify -F to overwrite it
the ezdata pool has just been
Hello I have a strange issue,
I'm having a setup with 24 disk enclosure connected with LSI3801-R. I created
two pools. Pool have 24 healthy disks.
I disabled LUN persistency on the LSI adapter.
When I cold boot the server (power off by pulling all power cables), a warning
is shown on the
On Feb 6, 2010, at 11:30 PM, Christo Kutrovsky wrote:
Eric, thanks for clarifying.
Could you confirm the release for #1 ? As today can be misleading depending
on the user.
A long time (snv_96/s10u8).
Is there a schedule/target for #2 ?
No.
And just to confirm the alternative to turn
On 05/02/2010 21:46, Nicolas Williams wrote:
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 04:41:08PM -0500, Miles Nordin wrote:
ch == c hanoverchano...@umich.edu writes:
ch is there a way to a) securely destroy a filesystem,
AIUI zfs crypto will include this, some day, by forgetting the key.
Right.
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Kjetil Torgrim Homme kjeti...@linpro.nowrote:
matthew patton patto...@yahoo.com writes:
true. but I buy a Ferrari for the engine and bodywork and chassis
engineering. It is totally criminal what Sun/EMC/Dell/Netapp do
charging customers 10x the open-market
No success, I tried with -F thought I do not like these tricks, but now it
complains about snapshost existing in destination.
Destination did not exist before, so what ?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
# zfs list
rpool/www 3.64G 377G 3.64G /var/www
rpool/zones 3.00G 377G24K /zones
rpool/zones/anduin1.94G 377G24K /zones/anduin
rpool/zones/anduin/ROOT 1.94G 377G21K legacy
rpool/zones/anduin/ROOT/zbe 1.94G 377G
dick hoogendijk wrote:
# zfs list
rpool/www 3.64G 377G 3.64G /var/www
rpool/zones 3.00G 377G24K /zones
rpool/zones/anduin1.94G 377G24K /zones/anduin
rpool/zones/anduin/ROOT 1.94G 377G21K legacy
Thomas Burgess wrote:
I've got a strange issue, If this is covered elsewhere, i apologize in
advance for my newbness
I've got a couple ZFS filesystems shared cifs and nfs, i've managed to
get ACL's working the way i want, provided things are accessed via cifs
and nfs.
If i create a new
Eric,
I am confused. What's difference between:
- turning off slogs (via logbias)
vs
- turning off ZIL (via kernel tunable)
Isn't that similar, just one is more granular?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
On 07/02/2010 20:07, Joerg Moellenkamp wrote:
Hello,
while writing some articles about dedup, hashes and ZFS for my blog, i
asked myself: When fletcher4 is fast, but collision prone and sha256 is
slower, but relatively secure, wouldn't it be reasonable to integrate
Skein
On Feb 6, 2010, at 21:08, Rob Logan wrote:
I failed to realize the AM3 cpus accepted UnBuffered ECC DDR3-1333
like Lynnfield. To use Intel's 6 slots vs AMD 4 slots, one must use
Registered ECC.
What is the difference between unbuffered and registered?
On Feb 7, 2010, at 15:10, Darren J Moffat wrote:
On 07/02/2010 20:07, Joerg Moellenkamp wrote:
Hello,
while writing some articles about dedup, hashes and ZFS for my
blog, i
asked myself: When fletcher4 is fast, but collision prone and
sha256 is
slower, but relatively secure, wouldn't it
Darren, thanks for reply.
Still not clear to me thought.
The only purpose of the slog is to serve the ZIL. There may be many ZILs on a
single slog.
From Milek's blog:
logbias=latency - data written to slog first
logbias=throughtput - data written directly to dataset.
Here's my problem. I
On 07/02/2010 20:56, Christo Kutrovsky wrote:
Darren, thanks for reply.
Still not clear to me thought.
Based on what you wrote below you do understand it.
The only purpose of the slog is to serve the ZIL. There may be many ZILs on a
single slog.
Correct, and correct.
From Milek's
Well, it's an attack, right? Neither Skein nor Threefish has been
compromised.
In fact, this is what you want to see - researchers attacking an algorithm
which
goes a long way toward furthering or proving the security of said
algorithm. I
think I agree with Darren overall, but this still looks
Tim Cook t...@cook.ms writes:
Kjetil Torgrim Homme kjeti...@linpro.no wrote:
I don't know what the J4500 drive sled contains, but for the J4200
and J4400 they need to include quite a bit of circuitry to handle
SAS protocol all the way, for multipathing and to be able to
accept a
On 02/ 7/10 12:57 PM, Thomas Burgess wrote:
I just started using send/receive myself yesterday.
This is what i found out
I wanted to do the same thing, i had a filesystem called Video in my
tank pool, it looked like this:
tank/nas/Video (pool was tank, it was a child of nas) and it was
Has anyone seen soft corruption in NTFS iSCSI ZVOLs after a power loss?
I mean, there is no guarantee writes will be executed in order, so in theory,
one could corrupt it's NTFS file system.
Would best practice be to rollback the last snapshot before making those iSCSI
available again?
--
While not strictly a ZFS issue as such I thought I'd post here as this and the
storage forums are my best bet in terms of getting some help.
I have a machine that I recently set up with b130, b131 and b132. With each
build I have been playing around with ZFS raidz2 and mirroring to do a little
Christo Kutrovsky kutrov...@pythian.com writes:
Has anyone seen soft corruption in NTFS iSCSI ZVOLs after a power
loss?
this is not from experience, but I'll answer anyway.
I mean, there is no guarantee writes will be executed in order, so in
theory, one could corrupt it's NTFS file system.
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Tim Cook t...@cook.ms wrote:
It's called spreading the costs around. Would you really rather pay 10x
the price on everything else besides the drives? This is essentially Sun's
way of tiered pricing. Rather than charge you a software fee based on how
much
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 9:07 PM, Marc Nicholas geekyth...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe magical unicorn controllers and drives are both bug-free and
100% spec compliant. The leprichorns sell them if you're trying to
find them ;)
Well, perfect and bug free sure don't exist in our industry.
The
On Sunday, February 7, 2010, Brian McKerr br...@datamatters.com.au wrote:
While not strictly a ZFS issue as such I thought I'd post here as this and
the storage forums are my best bet in terms of getting some help.
I have a machine that I recently set up with b130, b131 and b132. With each
Ian Collins wrote:
David Magda wrote:
On Feb 6, 2010, at 21:08, Rob Logan wrote:
I failed to realize the AM3 cpus accepted UnBuffered ECC DDR3-1333
like Lynnfield. To use Intel's 6 slots vs AMD 4 slots, one must use
Registered ECC.
What is the difference between unbuffered and registered?
I'd say your easiest two options are swap ports and
see if the problem
follows the drive. If it does, swap the drive out.
--Tim
___
Yep, that sounds like a plan.
Thanks for your suggestion.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 09:22:57AM -0800, Richard Elling wrote:
I'm interested in anecdotal evidence which suggests there is a
problem as it is currently designed.
I like to look at it differently: I'm not sure if there is a
problem. I'd like to have a simple way to discover a problem, using
I have some questions about the choice of SSDs to use for ZIL and L2ARC.
I'm trying to build an OpenSolaris iSCSI SAN out of a whitebox system,
which is intended to be used as a backup SAN during storage migration,
so it's built on a tight budget.
The system currently has 4GB RAM, 3GHz
On 2/8/10 12:49 AM -0200 Giovanni Tirloni wrote:
I think the industry is in a sad state when you buy enterprise-level
drives and they don't work as expected (see that thread about TLER
settings on WD enterprise drives) that you have to spend extra on drives
that got reviewed by a third-party
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 04:58:38AM +0100, Felix Buenemann wrote:
I have some questions about the choice of SSDs to use for ZIL and L2ARC.
I have one answer. The other questions are mostly related to your
raid controller, which I can't answer directly.
- Is it safe to run the L2ARC without
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 04:17:17PM -0800, Scott Meilicke wrote:
At this point, my server Gallardo can see the LUN, but like I said, it looks
blank to the OS. I suspect the 'sbdadm create-lu' phase.
Yeah, try the import version of that command.
--
Dan.
pgphS37DCPdV0.pgp
Description: PGP
32 matches
Mail list logo
