On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 5:11 AM, Andrej Podzimek and...@podzimek.org wrote:
I did not say there is something wrong about published reports. I often read
them. (Who doesn't?) However, there are no trustworthy reports on this topic
yet, since Btrfs is unfinished. Let's see some examples:
(1)
On 17.08.10 04:17, Will Murnane wrote:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 21:58, Kishore Kumar Pusukuri
kish...@cs.ucr.edu wrote:
Hi,
I am surprised with the performances of some 64-bit multi-threaded
applications on my AMD Opteron machine. For most of the applications, the
performance of 32-bit version
On 08/16/10 10:38 PM, George Wilson wrote:
Robert Hartzell wrote:
On 08/16/10 07:47 PM, George Wilson wrote:
The root filesystem on the root pool is set to 'canmount=noauto' so you
need to manually mount it first using 'zfs mount dataset name'. Then
run 'zfs mount -a'.
- George
mounting
BM wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 5:11 AM, Andrej Podzimek and...@podzimek.org wrote:
I did not say there is something wrong about published reports. I often read
them. (Who doesn't?) However, there are no trustworthy reports on this topic
yet, since Btrfs is unfinished. Let's see some
On 16 Aug 2010, at 23:11, Andrej Podzimek wrote:
My only point was: There is no published report saying that stability or
*performance* of Btrfs will be worse (or better) than that of ZFS. This is
because nobody can guess how Btrfs will perform once it's finished. (In fact
nobody even
On 08/17/10 09:43 PM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Garrett D'Amoregarr...@nexenta.com wrote:
It can be as simple as impact on the cache. 64-bit programs tend to be
bigger, and so they have a worse effect on the i-cache.
Unless your program does something that can inherently benefit from
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Will Murnane
I am surprised with the performances of some 64-bit multi-threaded
applications on my AMD Opteron machine. For most of the applications,
the performance of 32-bit version
Ian Collins i...@ianshome.com wrote:
If you have an orthogonal architecture like sparc, a typical 64 bit program
is
indeed a bit slower than the same program in 32 bit.
On Amd64, you have twice as many registers in 64 bit mode and this is the
reason for a typical performance gain of
On Aug 16, 2010, at 11:17 PM, Frank Cusack frank+lists/z...@linetwo.net wrote:
On 8/16/10 9:57 AM -0400 Ross Walker wrote:
No, the only real issue is the license and I highly doubt Oracle will
re-release ZFS under GPL to dilute it's competitive advantage.
You're saying Oracle wants to keep
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 9:13 AM, David Magda dma...@ee.ryerson.ca wrote:
On Aug 14, 2010, at 19:39, Kevin Walker wrote:
I once watched a video interview with Larry from Oracle, this ass rambled
on
about how he hates cloud computing and that everyone was getting into
cloud
computing and in
I did not say there is something wrong about published reports. I often read
them. (Who doesn't?) However, there are no trustworthy reports on this topic
yet, since Btrfs is unfinished. Let's see some examples:
(1) http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=articleitem=zfs_ext4_btrfsnum=1
My little
On 17-Aug-10, at 1:05 PM, Andrej Podzimek wrote:
I did not say there is something wrong about published reports. I
often read
them. (Who doesn't?) However, there are no trustworthy reports on
this topic
yet, since Btrfs is unfinished. Let's see some examples:
(1)
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010, Ross Walker wrote:
And there lies the problem, you need the agreement of all copyright
holders in a GPL project to change it's licensing terms and some
just will not budge.
Joerg is correct that CDDL code can legally live right alongside the
GPLv2 kernel code and run
On 8/17/10 9:14 AM -0400 Ross Walker wrote:
On Aug 16, 2010, at 11:17 PM, Frank Cusack frank+lists/z...@linetwo.net
wrote:
On 8/16/10 9:57 AM -0400 Ross Walker wrote:
No, the only real issue is the license and I highly doubt Oracle will
re-release ZFS under GPL to dilute it's competitive
On 8/17/10 3:31 PM +0900 BM wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 5:11 AM, Andrej Podzimek and...@podzimek.org
wrote:
Disclaimer: I use Reiser4
A Killer FS™. :-)
LOL
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 08/18/10 12:05 AM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Ian Collinsi...@ianshome.com wrote:
If you have an orthogonal architecture like sparc, a typical 64 bit program is
indeed a bit slower than the same program in 32 bit.
On Amd64, you have twice as many registers in 64 bit mode and this is the
Garrett D'Amore garr...@nexenta.com wrote:
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 14:04 -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010, Ross Walker wrote:
And there lies the problem, you need the agreement of all copyright
holders in a GPL project to change it's licensing terms and some
just
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Frank Cusack
frank+lists/z...@linetwo.netwrote:
On 8/17/10 9:14 AM -0400 Ross Walker wrote:
On Aug 16, 2010, at 11:17 PM, Frank Cusack frank+lists/z...@linetwo.net
wrote:
On 8/16/10 9:57 AM -0400 Ross Walker wrote:
No, the only real issue is the license
Ian Collins i...@ianshome.com wrote:
On 08/18/10 12:05 AM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Ian Collinsi...@ianshome.com wrote:
If you have an orthogonal architecture like sparc, a typical 64 bit
program is
indeed a bit slower than the same program in 32 bit.
On Amd64, you have twice
Hi Mark,
I would recheck with fmdump to see if you have any persistent errors
on the second disk.
The fmdump command will display faults and fmdump -eV will display
errors (persistent faults that have turned into errors based on some
criteria).
If fmdump -eV doesn't show any activity for
On 08/18/10 08:40 AM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Ian Collinsi...@ianshome.com wrote:
On 08/18/10 12:05 AM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Ian Collinsi...@ianshome.com wrote:
If you have an orthogonal architecture like sparc, a typical 64 bit program is
indeed a bit slower than the
gd == Garrett D'Amore garr...@nexenta.com writes:
Joerg is correct that CDDL code can legally live right
alongside the GPLv2 kernel code and run in the same program.
gd My understanding is that no, this is not possible.
GPLv2 and CDDL are incompatible:
Oh, as an insmod, I think the question is quite cloudy indeed, since you
get into questions about what forms a derivative product.
I was looking at the original statement of the two licenses running
together in the same program far too simply of course when
considered with dynamic link
On Aug 4, 2010, at 7:15 AM, Dmitry Sorokin wrote:
I'm in the same situation as Darren - my log SSD device died completely.
Victor, could you please explain how did you mocked up log device in a
file so zpool status started to show the device with UNAVAIL status?
I lost the latest
On Jul 9, 2010, at 4:27 AM, George wrote:
I think it is quite likely to be possible to get
readonly access to your data, but this requires
modified ZFS binaries. What is your pool version?
What build do you have installed on your system disk
or available as LiveCD?
For the record - using
25 matches
Mail list logo
