If dedup is ON and the pool develops a corruption in a file, I can never fix it
because when I try to copy the correct file on top of the corrupt file,
the block hash will match with the existing blocks and only reference count
will be updated. The only way to fix it is to delete all
snapshots (t
Actually, I figured it has nothing to do with /etc/zfs/zpool.cache. As part of
removing that file within a LiveCD, I was basically importing and exporting the
rpool.
So, the only thing required is an equivalent of 'zpool import -f rpool && zpool
export rpool'. I wonder why this can't be automate
> > I have a USB flash drive which boots up my
> > opensolaris install. What happens is that whenever
> I
> > move to a different machine,
> > the root pool is lost because the devids don't
> match
> > with what's in /etc/zfs/zpool.cache and the system
> > just can't find the rpool.
>
> See defect
On 21-Aug-10, at 3:06 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
On Aug 21, 2010, at 2:14 PM, Bill Sommerfeld > wrote:
On 08/21/10 10:14, Ross Walker wrote:
...
Would I be better off forgoing resiliency for simplicity, putting
all my faith into the Equallogic to handle data resiliency?
IMHO, no; the resultin
On Aug 21, 2010, at 2:21 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
> On Aug 21, 2010, at 4:40 PM, Richard Elling wrote:
>
>> On Aug 21, 2010, at 10:14 AM, Ross Walker wrote:
>>> I'm planning on setting up an NFS server for our ESXi hosts and plan on
>>> using a virtualized Solaris or Nexenta host to serve ZFS ove
On Aug 21, 2010, at 4:40 PM, Richard Elling wrote:
> On Aug 21, 2010, at 10:14 AM, Ross Walker wrote:
>> I'm planning on setting up an NFS server for our ESXi hosts and plan on
>> using a virtualized Solaris or Nexenta host to serve ZFS over NFS.
>
> Please follow the joint EMC+NetApp best prac
On Aug 21, 2010, at 10:14 AM, Ross Walker wrote:
> I'm planning on setting up an NFS server for our ESXi hosts and plan on using
> a virtualized Solaris or Nexenta host to serve ZFS over NFS.
Please follow the joint EMC+NetApp best practices for VMware ESX servers.
The recommendations apply to an
Just wanted to make a quick announcement that there will be an OpenStorage
Summit in Palo Alto, CA in late October. The conference should have a lot of
good OpenSolaris talks, with ZFS experts such as Bill Moore, Adam Levanthal,
and Ben Rockwood already planning to give presentations. The confere
> I have a USB flash drive which boots up my
> opensolaris install. What happens is that whenever I
> move to a different machine,
> the root pool is lost because the devids don't match
> with what's in /etc/zfs/zpool.cache and the system
> just can't find the rpool.
See defect 4755 or defect 5484
On Aug 21, 2010, at 2:14 PM, Bill Sommerfeld wrote:
> On 08/21/10 10:14, Ross Walker wrote:
>> I am trying to figure out the best way to provide both performance and
>> resiliency given the Equallogic provides the redundancy.
>
> (I have no specific experience with Equallogic; the following is
On 08/21/10 10:14, Ross Walker wrote:
I am trying to figure out the best way to provide both performance and
resiliency given the Equallogic provides the redundancy.
(I have no specific experience with Equallogic; the following is just
generic advice)
Every bit stored in zfs is checksummed
I'm planning on setting up an NFS server for our ESXi hosts and plan on using a
virtualized Solaris or Nexenta host to serve ZFS over NFS.
The storage I have available is provided by Equallogic boxes over 10Gbe iSCSI.
I am trying to figure out the best way to provide both performance and
resil
"And by the way: Wasn't there a comment of Linus Torvals recently that people
shound move their low-quality code into the codebase ??? ;)"
Anyone knows the link? Good against the Linux fanboys. :o)
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zf
On 08/21/10 08:50 PM, Simone Caldana wrote:
Il giorno 21/ago/2010, alle ore 10.10, Ian Collins ha scritto:
On 08/21/10 07:03 PM, Martin Mundschenk wrote:
After about 62 hours and 90%, the resilvering process got stuck. Since 12 hours
nothing happens anymore. Thus, I can not detach th
Il giorno 21/ago/2010, alle ore 10.10, Ian Collins ha scritto:
> On 08/21/10 07:03 PM, Martin Mundschenk wrote:
>> After about 62 hours and 90%, the resilvering process got stuck. Since 12
>> hours nothing happens anymore. Thus, I can not detach the spare device. Is
>> there a way to get the resi
On 08/21/10 07:03 PM, Martin Mundschenk wrote:
After about 62 hours and 90%, the resilvering process got stuck. Since
12 hours nothing happens anymore. Thus, I can not detach the spare
device. Is there a way to get the resilvering process back running?
Are you sure it's stuck? They can take a
After about 62 hours and 90%, the resilvering process got stuck. Since 12 hours
nothing happens anymore. Thus, I can not detach the spare device. Is there a
way to get the resilvering process back running?
Martin
Am 18.08.2010 um 20:11 schrieb Mark Musante:
> You need to let the resilver com
17 matches
Mail list logo
