Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS disk space monitoring with SNMP

2010-10-01 Thread Ray Van Dolson
On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 03:00:16PM -0700, Volker A. Brandt wrote: > Hello Ray, hello list! > > > > Running on Solaris 10 U9 here. How do most of you monitor disk usage / > > capacity on your large zpools remotely via SNMP tools? > > > > Net SNMP seems to be using a 32-bit unsigned integer (based

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS disk space monitoring with SNMP

2010-10-01 Thread Volker A. Brandt
Hello Ray, hello list! > Running on Solaris 10 U9 here. How do most of you monitor disk usage / > capacity on your large zpools remotely via SNMP tools? > > Net SNMP seems to be using a 32-bit unsigned integer (based on the MIB) > for hrStorageSize and friends, and thus we're not able to get acc

[zfs-discuss] ZFS disk space monitoring with SNMP

2010-10-01 Thread Ray Van Dolson
Hey folks; Running on Solaris 10 U9 here. How do most of you monitor disk usage / capacity on your large zpools remotely via SNMP tools? Net SNMP seems to be using a 32-bit unsigned integer (based on the MIB) for hrStorageSize and friends, and thus we're not able to get accurate numbers for size

Re: [zfs-discuss] Is there a way to limit ZFS File Data but maintain room for the ARC to cache metadata

2010-10-01 Thread Freddie Cash
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 11:46 AM, David Blasingame Oracle wrote: > I'm working on this scenario in which file system activity appears to cause > the arc cache to evict meta data.  I would like to have a preference to keep > the metadata in cache over ZFS File Data > > What I've notice on import of

[zfs-discuss] Is there a way to limit ZFS File Data but maintain room for the ARC to cache metadata

2010-10-01 Thread David Blasingame Oracle
I'm working on this scenario in which file system activity appears to cause the arc cache to evict meta data. I would like to have a preference to keep the metadata in cache over ZFS File Data What I've notice on import of a zpool the arc_meta_used goes up significantly. ZFS meta data operat

[zfs-discuss] Transfer/Performance Issue(s)

2010-10-01 Thread joe
Hello I'll first give you my setup, and then explain my problems. NexentaOS_134f i86pc i386 i86pc Solaris - NexentaCore 30 Hardy 804b134 2x Western Digital Caviar Black WD6402AAEX 640GB 7200 SATA 6.0Gb/s (Mirror Boot) 9x HITACHI Deskstar 7K2000 HDS722020ALA330 2TB 7200 SATA 3.0Gb/s (Data) Raidz2

Re: [zfs-discuss] making sense of arcstat.pl output

2010-10-01 Thread Mike Harsch
przemol, Thanks for the feedback. I had incorrectly assumed that any machine running the script would have L2ARC implemented (which is not the case with Solaris 10). I've added a check for this that allows the script to work on non-L2ARC machines as long as you don't specify L2ARC stats on th

Re: [zfs-discuss] making sense of arcstat.pl output

2010-10-01 Thread Mike Harsch
Hello Christian, Thanks for bringing this to my attention. I believe I've fixed the rounding error in the latest version. http://github.com/mharsch/arcstat -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolar

[zfs-discuss] Readonly attribute on file

2010-10-01 Thread Anton Pomozov
I have the smbshare on zfs volume. When I copy file with readonly attr on the share the file becomes undeletable. I can't change Read-Only attribute from Windows. I can delete it from osol only. What I need to do to avoid this situation?? (Except to do not set read-only attr to source file). devs

Re: [zfs-discuss] Disk keeps resilvering, was: Replacing a disk never completes

2010-10-01 Thread Victor Latushkin
On Sep 30, 2010, at 11:00 PM, Ben Miller wrote: > On 09/22/10 04:27 PM, Ben Miller wrote: >> On 09/21/10 09:16 AM, Ben Miller wrote: > >>> I had tried a clear a few times with no luck. I just did a detach and that >>> did remove the old disk and has now triggered another resilver which >>> hopef

Re: [zfs-discuss] dedup status

2010-10-01 Thread Markus Kovero
Hi! > Hi all > I just tested dedup on this test box running OpenIndiana (147) storing bacula > backups, and did some more testing on some datasets with ISO images. The > > results show so far that removing 30GB deduped datasets are done in a matter > of minutes, which is not the case with 134

Re: [zfs-discuss] making sense of arcstat.pl output

2010-10-01 Thread przemolicc
Hello, I have the follwowing message: # ./arcstat.pl 1 time read miss miss% dmis dm% pmis pm% mmis mm% arcsz c Use of uninitialized value in division (/) at ./arcstat.pl line 262. Use of uninitialized value in division (/) at ./arcstat.pl line 263. Use of uninitialized value in d

Re: [zfs-discuss] Please warn a home user against OpenSolaris under VirtualBox under WinXP ; )

2010-10-01 Thread Richard L. Hamilton
Hmm...according to http://www.mail-archive.com/vbox-users-commun...@lists.sourceforge.net/msg00640.html that's only needed before VirtualBox 3.2, or for IDE. >= 3.2, non-IDE should honor flush requests, if I read that correctly. Which is good, because I haven't seen an example of how to enabling

Re: [zfs-discuss] making sense of arcstat.pl output

2010-10-01 Thread Christian Meier
Hello Mike, thank you for your update. r...@s0011 # ./arcstat.pl 3 time read miss miss% dmis dm% pmis pm% mmis mm% arcszc 11:23:38 197K 7.8K 3 5.7K 3 2.1K 4 6.1K 5 511M 1.5G 11:23:41 700 00 00 00 0 511M 1.5G 11:23:44 760 00 00