Re: [zfs-discuss] FS Reliability WAS: about btrfs and zfs

2011-10-21 Thread Paul Kraus
Recently someone posted to this list of that _exact_ situation, they loaded an OS to a pair of drives while a pair of different drives containing an OS were still attached. The zpool on the first pair ended up not being able to be imported, and were corrupted. I can post more info when I am back in

Re: [zfs-discuss] FS Reliability WAS: about btrfs and zfs

2011-10-21 Thread Mike Gerdts
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Fred Liu wrote: > >> 3. Do NOT let a system see drives with more than one OS zpool at the >> same time (I know you _can_ do this safely, but I have seen too many >> horror stories on this list that I just avoid it). >> > > Can you elaborate #3? In what situation wi

Re: [zfs-discuss] FS Reliability WAS: about btrfs and zfs

2011-10-21 Thread Fred Liu
> 3. Do NOT let a system see drives with more than one OS zpool at the > same time (I know you _can_ do this safely, but I have seen too many > horror stories on this list that I just avoid it). > Can you elaborate #3? In what situation will it happen? Thanks. Fred ___

Re: [zfs-discuss] Growing CKSUM errors with no READ/WRITE errors

2011-10-21 Thread Eric Sproul
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 7:55 AM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote: >> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss- >> boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Jim Klimov >> >> new CKSUM errors >> are being found. There are zero READ or WRITE error counts, >> though. >> >> Should we be worrie

Re: [zfs-discuss] commercial zfs-based storage replication software?

2011-10-21 Thread Fajar A. Nugraha
2011/10/20 Jim Klimov : > 2011-10-19 17:54, Fajar A. Nugraha пишет: >> >> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 7:52 PM, Jim Klimov  wrote: >>> >>> Well, just for the sake of completeness: most of our systems are using >>> zfs-auto-snap service, including Solaris 10 systems datiing from Sol10u6. >>> Installation