uwtjie Burger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2007 2:01 PM
To: Alderman, Sean
Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] Problem attaching a disk to a mirror...
Have you tried to "blank" out c0t3d0s2 using dd and zeros?
Btw, "zpool attach -f zpol01
I'm looking for ideas to resolve the problem below...
# zpool attach -f zpol01 c0t2d0 c0t3d0
invalid vdev specification
the following errors must be manually repaired:
/dev/dsk/c0t3d0s0 is part of an active ZFS pool on zpool01. Please see
zpool(1M)
# zpool status
pool: zpool01
state: ONLINE
s
Could anyone give me some possible problems that would have created the
following scenario?
Testing the conversion of a ZFS Pool on a hardware mirror to that same
ZFS Pool using ZFS mirroring, by breaking the mirror, attaching the 2nd
disk to the pool...
bash-3.00# zpool scrub zpool02
bash-3.00#
The OP here is posting the "Z"illion dollar question ... And apologies in
advance for the verbal diarrhea.
Most of the Enterprise Level systems people here (my company) look at ZFS and
say, "Wow that's really cool...but..." What comes after the "but..." is a host
of questions that ultimately c
ZFS will stripe across all Root Level VDEVs, regardless of type of VDEV
(mirror, raidz, single whole disk, disk slices, whatever).
e.g.
tank01
mirror
c1t0d0
c1t1d0
raidz
c1t2d0
c1t3d0
c1t4d0
mirror
c0t0d0s7
c0t1d0s7
Should give you 3 stripes.
--
Sean
-Original M
Is it possible to convert a plain jane disk (or slice) vdev to a mirror
vdev? With SVM (and other Volume Managers) it's not terribly difficult
to change a plain meta device to a mirrored meta device. Can this be
done with ZFS?...
Like convert something similar to...
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/]# zpool
This is good news, thank you for the blog!
If I may ask a couple of questions to the community on the topic of OLTP
workload and ZFS...
1. When evaluating ZFS for our Oracle systems (heavy 8K uncached
workload), our DBAs used the ZFS vs. VxFS whitepaper
http://www.sun.com/software/whitepapers/so
Doesn't that then create dependence on the cxtxdxsx device name to be
available?
/dev/dsk/c2t500601601020813Ed0s0 = path1
/dev/dsk/c2t500601681020813Ed0s0 = path2
/dev/dsk/emcpower0a = pseudo device pointing to both paths.
So if you've got a zpool on /dev/dsk/c2t500601601020813Ed0s0 and that
pa
y.
--
Sean M. Alderman
513.204.2704
-Original Message-
From: Brian Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2007 1:58 PM
To: Alderman, Sean
Cc: Peter Tribble; zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS and powerpath
Hmm. Odd. I've got PowerPath w
er Tribble [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2007 11:53 AM
To: Alderman, Sean
Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS and powerpath
On 7/13/07, Alderman, Sean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You wouldn't happen to be running this on a SPARC would
You wouldn't happen to be running this on a SPARC would you?
I started a thread last week regarding CLARiiON+ZFS+SPARC = core dump
when creating a zpool. I filed a bug report, though it doesn't appear
to be in the database (not sure if that means it was rejected or I
didn't submit it correctly).
Does anyone on the list have definitive information on whether ZFS works
with CLARiiON devices?
bash-3.00# uname -a
SunOS XXX 5.10 Generic_118833-33 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-V245
bash-3.00# powermt display dev=all
Pseudo name=emcpower0a
CLARiiON ID=APM00033500540 [XXX]
Logical device ID=
Hi all,
I'm new to the list as of today, I've come because I'm fascinated with
ZFS and my company has just begun an adventure into the unknown with
Solaris 10.
We've got a few Sun Fire X4200's and a few Sun Fire V245's that we're
playing with and we've come to a decision point about how to confi
13 matches
Mail list logo
