is going to suck.
thanks for pointing out the obvious. :)
Still, though, this is basically true for ANY drive.
It's worse for slower RPM drives, but it's not like resilvers will
exactly be fast with 7200rpm drives, either.
danno
--
Dan Pritts, Sr. Systems Engineer
Internet2
office: +1-734-352-4953
on these drives.
danno
--
Dan Pritts, Sr. Systems Engineer
Internet2
office: +1-734-352-4953 | mobile: +1-734-834-7224
Visit our website: www.internet2.edu
Follow us on Twitter: www.twitter.com/internet2
Become a Fan on Facebook: www.internet2.edu/facebook
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 06:25:18PM +0200, Tomas Ă–gren wrote:
Resilver does a whole lot of random io itself, not bulk reads.. It reads
the filesystem tree, not block 0, block 1, block 2... You won't get
60MB/s sustained, not even close.
Even with large, unfragmented files?
danno
--
Dan
did something very similar but with over 1000 CDs. If you can scare
up an external DVD drive, use it too - that way you'll have to change
half as many times.
danno
--
Dan Pritts, Sr. Systems Engineer
Internet2
office: +1-734-352-4953 | mobile: +1-734-834-7224
Internet2 Spring Member Meeting
about promise
FC arrays. They were clearly not ready for prime time.
OTOH a SAS jbod is a lot less complicated.
danno
--
Dan Pritts, Sr. Systems Engineer
Internet2
office: +1-734-352-4953 | mobile: +1-734-834-7224
Internet2 Spring Member Meeting
April 26-28, 2010 - Arlington, Virginia
http
as a ZIL. Maybe as a
read cache though.
danno
--
Dan Pritts, Sr. Systems Engineer
Internet2
office: +1-734-352-4953 | mobile: +1-734-834-7224
Winter 2010 ESCC/Internet2 Joint Techs
Hosted by the University of Utah - Salt Lake City, UT
January 31 - February 4, 2010
http://events.internet2.edu/2010
On Nov 4, 2009, at 6:02 PM, Jim Klimov wrote:
Thanks for the link, but the main concern in spinning down drives of a ZFS
pool
is that ZFS by default is not so idle. Every 5 to 30 seconds it closes a
transaction
group (TXG) which requires a synchronous write of metadata to disk.
I'm
question - I presume that I need to devote a pair of disks
to the OS, so I really only get 14 disks for data. Correct?
thanks!
danno
--
Dan Pritts, Sr. Systems Engineer
Internet2
office: +1-734-352-4953 | mobile: +1-734-834-7224
ESCC/Internet2 Joint Techs
July 19-23, 2009 - Indianapolis, Indiana
.
the way i'd try to do this would be to use the same box under solaris
software RAID, or better yet linux or windows software RAID (to make
sure it's not a solaris device driver problem).
does pulling the disk then get noticed? If so, it's a zfs bug.
danno
--
Dan Pritts, System Administrator
Scientific) told them the raid was hosed and they should
rebuild from scratch, hope you had a backup.
danno
--
Dan Pritts, System Administrator
Internet2
office: +1-734-352-4953 | mobile: +1-734-834-7224
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss
thing.
I wonder if you've got a scsi card/driver problem. We tried using
an Adaptec card with solaris with poor results; switched to LSI,
it just works.
danno
--
Dan Pritts, System Administrator
Internet2
office: +1-734-352-4953 | mobile: +1-734-834-7224
by
adding the PATA disk. But, i think that you need SATA300 to support
that feature.
danno
--
Dan Pritts, System Administrator
Internet2
office: +1-734-352-4953 | mobile: +1-734-834-7224
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http
12 matches
Mail list logo