Re: [zfs-discuss] Fwd: zpool import despite missing log [PSARC/2010/292Self Review]

(with 8 x 500 GB disks) sitting for almost 6 months unavailable. This was my Christmas present! Best regards, Dmitry Office phone: 905.625.6471 ext. 104 Cell phone: 416.529.1627 -Original Message- From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org

Re: [zfs-discuss] Fwd: zpool import despite missing log [PSARC/2010/292Self Review]

~]# Bets regards, Dmitry From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Robert Milkowski Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 7:12 PM To: ZFS Discussions Subject: [zfs-discuss] Fwd: zpool import despite missing log [PSARC/2010/292Self Review

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZIL SSD failed

anyone have logfix binary compiled for snv_129? Thanks, Dmitry -Original Message- From: Richard Elling [mailto:richard.ell...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 5:12 PM To: Dmitry Sorokin Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] ZIL SSD failed Is the drive still there? If so, then try removing

[zfs-discuss] ZIL SSD failed

would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Dmitry ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

[zfs-discuss] ZFS dedup, snapshots and NFS

but they referred me to OpenSolaris community mailing list or as they've explained it's not Nexenta, but rather OpenSolaris issue. Thanks, Dmitry ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS dedup, snapshots and NFS

Thanks a lot for heads up Garrett. I'll be watching for an update from Nexenta then. Dmitry From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Garrett D'Amore Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 3:57 PM To: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org Subject

Re: [zfs-discuss] Which build is the most stable, mainly for NAS (zfs)?

Thanks for the tips, I tried EON, but it is too minimalistic, I plan to use this server for other (monitoring server and etc.) Nexenta is a strange hybrid, and use the not commercial version, without its ability, i don't know... A napp-it i'll try for sure -- This message posted from

Re: [zfs-discuss] Which build is the most stable, mainly for NAS (zfs)?

free nexentastor community edition = commercial edition without support, You are opened my eyes :) start to download, tomorrow will look -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org

[zfs-discuss] Which build is the most stable, mainly for NAS (zfs)?

Which build is the most stable, mainly for NAS? I plann NAS zfs + CIFS,iSCSI Thanks -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Re: [zfs-discuss] Which build is the most stable, mainly for NAS (zfs)?

Yesterday I received a victim. SuperServer 5026T-3RF 19 2U, Intel X58, 1xCPU LGA1366 8xSAS/SATA hot-swap drive bays, 8 ports SAS LSI 1068E, 6 ports SATA-II Intel ICH10R, 2xGigabit Ethernet and i have 2 ways Openfiler vs Opensolaris :) -- This message posted from opensolaris.org

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS poor performance on Areca 1231ML

for a single device zfs volume, but the final result remained the same: single disk zfs volume is only about twice slower, then 9 disks raidz zfs volume, which seems to be very strange. My expectations are in a range of 6-7 times difference in performance. Best Regards, Dmitry -- This message posted from

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS poor performance on Areca 1231ML

. Is there any way to increase i/o counts for my iTank zpool? I'm running OS-11.2008 on MSI P45 Diamond with 4G of memory Best Regards, Dmitry -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http

[zfs-discuss] Lack of physical memory evidences

In pre-ZFS era, we had observable parameters like scan rate and anonymous page-in/-out counters to discover situations when a system experiences a lack of physical memory. With ZFS, it's difficult to use mentioned parameters to figure out situations like that. Has someone any idea what we can

[zfs-discuss] ZFS quota

Hello Is there a way to limit size of filesystem not including snapshots? Or even better size of data on filesystem regardless of compression. If not is it planned? It is hard to explain to user that it is normal that after deleting his files he did not receive more space. Even harder to ask to

[zfs-discuss] Re: Samba and ZFS ACL Question

May be this link could help you? http://www.nabble.com/VFS-module-handling-ACL-on-ZFS-t3730348.html This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org