Can someone clarify Sun's approach to opensourcing projects and
software? I was under the impression the strategy was to charge for
hardware, maintenance and PS. If not, some clarification would be nice.
On Nov 11, 2008, at 12:38 PM, Bryan Cantrill wrote:
4. If we do make something
:21:11PM -0500, Ed Saipetch wrote:
Can someone clarify Sun's approach to opensourcing projects and
software? I was under the impression the strategy was to charge for
hardware, maintenance and PS. If not, some clarification would be
nice.
There is no single answer -- we use open source
That's the one that's been an issue for me and my customers - they
get billed back for GB allocated to their servers by the back end
arrays.
To be more explicit about the 'self-healing properties' -
To deal with any fs corruption situation that would traditionally
require an fsck on
This array has not been formally announced yet and information on
general availability is not available as far as I know. I saw the
docs last week and the product was supposed to be launched a couple of
weeks ago.
Unofficially this is Sun's continued push to develop cheaper storage
Wiwat,
You should make sure that you have read the Best Practices Guide and the
Evil Tuning Guide for helpful information on optimizing ZFS for Oracle.
There are some things you can do to tweak ZFS to get better performance
like using a separate filesystem for logs and separating the ZFS
Tried that... completely different cases with different power supplies.
On Oct 30, 2007, at 10:28 AM, Al Hopper wrote:
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, MC wrote:
Here's what I've done so far:
The obvious thing to test is the drive controller, so maybe you
should do that :)
Also - while you're
Hello,
I'm experiencing major checksum errors when using a syba silicon image 3114
based pci sata controller w/ nonraid firmware. I've tested by copying data via
sftp and smb. With everything I've swapped out, I can't fathom this being a
hardware problem. There have been quite a few blog
