On 08/13/2010 01:39 PM, Tim Cook wrote:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/08/13/opensolaris_is_dead/
I'm a bit surprised at this development... Oracle really just doesn't
get it. The part that's most disturbing to me is the fact they won't be
releasing nightly snapshots. It appears they've s
In 3.0.3+ new option would list appliance changelog going forward:
nmc$ show version -c
On 07/04/2010 05:58 PM, Bohdan Tashchuk wrote:
Where can I find a list of these?
This leads to the more generic question of: where are *any* release notes?
I saw on Genunix that Community Edition 3.0.3 wa
Hi Kyle,
very likely that you hit driver bug in isp. After the reboot, take a
look on /var/adm/messages file - anything related might shed some light.
I wouldn't suspect Intel GigE card - fairly good one and driver is very
stable.
Also, some upgrades posted, make sure the kernel displays 13
Good news for Nexenta and OpenSolaris community in general:
http://www.nexenta.com/corp/blog/2010/04/06/bill-moore-joins-nexenta-advisory-board/
Nexenta invites talents and hiring OpenSolaris Kernel/API engineers. If
you are in SF bay area and you think you are qualified, send your resume
by f
Eric D. Mudama wrote:
On Wed, Oct 28 at 13:40, "C. Bergström" wrote:
Tim Cook wrote:
PS: Not having enough engineers to support a growing and paying
customer base is a *good* problem to have. The opposite is much,
much
worse.
So use Nexenta?
Got data you care about?
Verify
C. Bergström wrote:
Eugen Leitl wrote:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 01:40:12PM +0800, "C. Bergström" wrote:
So use Nexenta?
Got data you care about?
Verify extensively before you jump to that ship.. :)
So you're saying Nexenta have been known to drop bits on
the floor, unprovoke
As far as I know, its an effort! Not just for x4275 specifically, but in
general with any other x86 hardware and storage oriented software. A lot
of work required to support a final solution as well. What Nexenta does
with its version of NexentaStor is enabling third-party Partners to
integrate
Frank Cusack wrote:
On October 19, 2009 9:53:14 AM +1300 Trevor Pretty
wrote:
Frank
I've been looking into:-
http://www.nexenta.com/corp/index.php?option=com_content&task=blogsection
&id=4&Itemid=128
Thanks! I *thought* there was a Nexenta solution but a google search
didn't turn anything u
May be what you saying is true wrt. NexentaCore 2.0. But hey, think
about open source principals and development process. We do hope that
NexentaCore will become an official Debian distribution some day! We
evolving and driven completely by the community here. Anyone can
participate and fix the
Something like this?
http://www.nexenta.com/corp/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=171&Itemid=112
Daniel P. Bath wrote:
Has anyone created a opensource plugin for WORM (Write Once, Read Many) for
OpenSolaris?
Any ideas how hard it would be to create this?
On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 14:53 -0400, Cherry Shu wrote:
> Are any plans for an API that would allow ZFS commands including
> snapshot/rollback integrated with customer's application?
Sounds like you are looking for abstraction layering on top of
integrated solution such as NexentaStor. Take a look o
James,
also there is this demo:
http://www.nexenta.com/demos/auto-cdp.html
showing how AVS/ZFS integrated in NexentaStor.
On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 10:25 -0600, James D. Rogers wrote:
> The links to the Part 1 and Part 2 demos on this page
> (http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/avs/Demos/) appear
Hi Stephen,
NexentaStor v1.1.5+ could be an alternative, I think. And it includes
new cool COMSTAR integration, i.e. ZFS shareiscsi property actually
implements COMSTAR iSCSI target "share" functionality not available in
SXCE. http://www.nexenta.com/nexentastor-relnotes
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 07:
pNFS is NFS-centric of course and it is not yet stable, isn't it? btw,
what is the ETA for pNFS putback?
On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 12:20 -0700, Marion Hakanson wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > It's interesting how the speed and optimisation of these maintenance
> > activities limit pool size. It'
.
> I know they're in Solaris Express and the updated binary distro
> form of os2008.05 - I just don't know whether Erast and the
> Nexenta clan have included them in what they are releasing as 1.0.8.
>
> Erast - could you chime in here please? Unfortunately I've got n
On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 19:42 -0400, Maurice Volaski wrote:
> >On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 19:10 -0400, Maurice Volaski wrote:
> >> >On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 18:37 -0400, Maurice Volaski wrote:
> >> >> >On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 15:00 -0400, Maurice Volaski wrote:
> >> >> >> >On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 14:36 -04
On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 19:10 -0400, Maurice Volaski wrote:
> >On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 18:37 -0400, Maurice Volaski wrote:
> >> >On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 15:00 -0400, Maurice Volaski wrote:
> >> >> >On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 14:36 -0400, Maurice Volaski wrote:
> >> >> >> A disadvantage, however, is that
On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 18:37 -0400, Maurice Volaski wrote:
> >On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 15:00 -0400, Maurice Volaski wrote:
> >> >On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 14:36 -0400, Maurice Volaski wrote:
> >> >> A disadvantage, however, is that Sun StorageTek Availability Suite
> >> >> (AVS), the DRBD equivalent i
On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 15:00 -0400, Maurice Volaski wrote:
> >On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 14:36 -0400, Maurice Volaski wrote:
> >> A disadvantage, however, is that Sun StorageTek Availability Suite
> >> (AVS), the DRBD equivalent in OpenSolaris, is much less flexible than
> >> DRBD. For example, AVS is
On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 14:36 -0400, Maurice Volaski wrote:
> A disadvantage, however, is that Sun StorageTek Availability Suite
> (AVS), the DRBD equivalent in OpenSolaris, is much less flexible than
> DRBD. For example, AVS is intended to replicate in one direction,
> from a primary to a seconda
Well, obviously - its Linux vs. OpenSolaris question. Most serious
advantage of OpenSolaris is ZFS and its enterprise level storage stack.
Linux just not there yet..
On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 14:51 +0200, Axel Schmalowsky wrote:
> Hallo list,
>
> hope that so can help me on this topic.
>
> I'd like
Steffen,
Most complete and serious ZFS snapshot management, integrated ZFS
send/recv replication over RSYNC with CLI, integrated AVS, GUI and
management server which provides rich API for C/C++/Perl/Python/Ruby
integrators available here:
http://www.nexenta.com/nexentastor-overview
Its ZFS+ with
Hey folks,
just saw another cool news this morning - Nexenta Systems released
documentation for remote API and Windows SDK with demos for accessing
NexentaStor. News itself:
http://www.nexenta.com/corp/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=154&Itemid=56
ZFS and the rest of appliance function
Hi folks,
wanted to share some exciting news with you. Pogo Linux shipping
NexentaStor pre-installed boxes, like this one 16TB - 24TB:
http://www.pogolinux.com/quotes/editsys?sys_id=3989
And here is announce:
http://www.nexenta.com/corp/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=129&Itemid=56
P
http://blogs.sun.com/constantin/entry/x4500_solaris_zfs_iscsi_perfect
On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 14:44 -0600, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> It would be useful if people here who have used iSCSI on top of ZFS
> could share their performance experiences. It is very easy to waste a
> lot of time trying to r
Take a look on NexentaStor - its a complete 2nd tier solution:
http://www.nexenta.com/products
and AVS is nicely integrated via management RPC interface which is
connecting multiple NexentaStor nodes together and greatly simplifies
AVS usage with ZFS... See demo here:
http://www.nexenta.com/demo
well, we had some problems with si3124 driver, but with driver binary
posted in this forum the problem seems been fixed. Later we saw the same
fix went in into b72.
On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 05:11 +0300, Jonathan Stewart wrote:
> Jeff Bonwick wrote:
> > The Silicon Image 3114 controller is known to co
I believe issue been fixed in snv_72+, no?
On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 16:41 -0800, Jeff Bonwick wrote:
> The Silicon Image 3114 controller is known to corrupt data.
> Google for "silicon image 3114 corruption" to get a flavor.
> I'd suggest getting your data onto different h/w, quickly.
>
> Jeff
>
>
Hi guys,
new article available explaining details on how enterprise-like upgrades
integrated with Nexenta Core Platform starting from RC2 using ZFS
capabilities and Debian APT:
http://www.nexenta.org/os/TransactionalZFSUpgrades
What is NexentaCP?
NexentaCP is a minimal (core) foundation that ca
Thank you!
we are working on it. new website is coming, as well as next release of
NCP. Meanwhile, old RC1 could be downloaded from:
http://archive.nexenta.org/releases
On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 18:01 -0800, MC wrote:
> > 2) Unstable APT integrated with ON build 79, give it a try!
>
> Excellent pro
Hi All,
This is the road to NCP 1.0...
Our motto:
"""Ubuntu makes best Debian Desktop platform - Nexenta makes best Debian
Server/Storage platform."""
Some latest Nexenta related news:
1) Official Nexenta Core Platform (NCP) repository now is
http://apt.nexenta.org
2) Unstable APT integrated
ptic package manager is really impressive
> is there a way to transform Sun package to a synaptic package?
>
> selim
>
> On 6/22/07, Al Hopper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, Erast Benson wrote:
> >
> > > New unstable ISO of NexentaCP
/var/lib/apt/*
$ sudo apt-get update
--
Erast
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 16:26 -0400, Francois Saint-Jacques wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 11:51:08PM -0700, Erast Benson wrote:
> > More details on NexentaCP will be available soon...
>
> Is it based on Alpha7?
Alpha7 is the Desktop-oriented ISO, however they share the same main
installer supports ZFS/Boot type of installations
on single disk or 2+ mirror configuration. For now, only "Auto"
partitioning mode could be used for ZFS root partition creation.
More details on NexentaCP will be available soon...
--
Erast
___
zfs-
be deployed in
> their production environments.
>
>
>
> Maybe I should be configuring my workload differently for VDBench – if
> so, does anyone have any ideas on this?
>
>
>
> Unfortunately, I have weeks worth of test data to back up these
> numbers and would enjoy the opportunity to
On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 09:29 -0700, Erast Benson wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 16:22 +, Darren J Moffat wrote:
> > Robert Milkowski wrote:
> > > Hello devid,
> > >
> > > Tuesday, March 20, 2007, 3:58:27 PM, you wrote:
> > >
> > > d>
tatus or if someone even started coding it.
> >
> > Your second question - no, you can't.
>
> Yes you can and it has been there even before ZFS existed see fsattr(5)
> it isn't ZFS specific but a generic attribute extension to the
> filesystems, currently supp
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
>
> ___
> zfs-discuss mailing list
> zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
--
Erast
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
N not
> the installer bits - particularly those people interested in building
> their own distros of OpenSolaris.
+1
SchiliX, BeleniX, Nexenta, Martux have their own installers and boot
environments anyways, so would be *really* nice if you guys could open
up zfs root ON bits.
--
Erast
___
* box. I googled "Minimal
> solaris configuration" and found several articles.
Alternative way would be to simply use NexentaOS InstallCD and select
"Minimal Profile" during installation.
--
Erast
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
41 matches
Mail list logo
