Re: [zfs-discuss] sparc + zfs + nfs + mac osX = fail ?

2009-11-09 Thread Peter Lees
i wonder whether this is related to an itunes update - it tends to fiddle about in the library for a bit when you install ? (??) -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris

Re: [zfs-discuss] sparc + zfs + nfs + mac osX = fail ?

2009-11-09 Thread Peter Lees
> hi folks, > > i'm seeing an odd problem & wondered whether others > had encountered it. > > when i try to write to a nevada NFS share from a mac > os X (10.5) client via the mac's GUI, i get a > permissions error - the file is 0 bytes, date set to > jan 1, 1970, and perms set to 000. writing t

[zfs-discuss] sparc + zfs + nfs + mac osX = fail ?

2009-11-05 Thread Peter Lees
hi folks, i'm seeing an odd problem & wondered whether others had encountered it. when i try to write to a nevada NFS share from a mac os X (10.5) client via the mac's GUI, i get a permissions error - the file is 0 bytes, date set to jan 1, 1970, and perms set to 000. writing to the share via

[zfs-discuss] zfs root / cannot activate new BE

2008-06-12 Thread Peter Lees
i folks i have set up a new BE on zfs root, but it does not want to activate. server is build 90, x86 (64 bit) i already have 2 other BE's on UFS/SVM when i try to activate the zfs BE it seems OK, but on reboot now zfs BE option is shown in grub. i have 2 disks: disk 1 has the 2 SVM metadevic