Re: [zfs-discuss] tagged ACL groups: let's just keep digging until we come out the other side (was: zfs proerty aclmode gone in 147?)

2010-09-29 Thread Ralph Böhme
> Keep in mind that Windows lacks a mode_t. We need to > interop with Windows. Oh my, I see. Another itch to scratch. Now at least Windows users are happy while me and mabye others are not. -r -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discus

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs proerty aclmode gone in 147?

2010-09-29 Thread Ralph Böhme
> On 9/28/2010 2:13 PM, Nicolas Williams wrote: > The version of samba bundled with Solaris 10 seems to > insist on > chmod'ing stuff. I've tried all of the various > options that should > disable mapping to mode bits, yet still randomly when > people copy files > in over CIFS, ACL's get destroy

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs proerty aclmode gone in 147?

2010-09-29 Thread Ralph Böhme
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 12:18:49PM -0700, Paul B. > Henson wrote: > > On Sat, 25 Sep 2010, [iso-8859-1] Ralph Böhme > wrote: > > > > > Darwin ACL model is nice and slick, the new NFSv4 > one in 147 is just > > > braindead. chmod resulting in

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs proerty aclmode gone in 147?

2010-09-25 Thread Ralph Böhme
> I must admit though, that the new ACL/ACE model in > 147 is really nice and slick. Darwin ACL model is nice and slick, the new NFSv4 one in 147 is just braindead. chmod resulting in ACLs being discarded is a bizarre design decision. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org _