Hi,
Just be reading about apache.org incident report for 8/28/2009
( https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/apache_org_downtime_report )
The use of Solaris and ZFS on the European server was interesting including the
recovery.
However, what I found more interesting was the use of one time passwo
Thanks for clearing up the issue
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Are tools necessary to ensure that deleted ZFS pools can not be recovered or
that deleted filesystems are really deleted?
If the current delete commands do offer some level of data recovery, is worth
offering a destroy command which deletes and ensures no means of recovery other
than a backup?
Hi,
A couple of years ago I compared Solaris 10 and XP x64 on the same hardware
(dual opteron) running the same analytical cases. Each OS had a clean install
before use :-
Case CPU time System Time Lapse Bits OS
No Secs Secs hh:mm:ss
1 5890
Hi,
In respect of snapshots :-
a) should the snapshot process it self be modified to allow restoring
of individual files via zfs rollback
b) should there be a zfs rollfile to selectively restore files from a
snapshot
c) should there be a zfs purge which would allow file(s) to be removed
fro
James C. McPherson wrote:
> can you guess? wrote:
> ...
>
>> Ah - thanks to both of you. My own knowledge of video format internals
>> is so limited that I assumed most people here would be at least equally
>> familiar with the notion that a flipped bit or two in a video would
>> hardly qualify
Hi,
As part of a disk subsystem upgrade I am thinking of using ZFS but there are
two issues at present
1) The current filesystems are mounted as /hostname/mountpoint except for one
directory where the mount point is /.
Is is possible to mount a ZFS filesystem as /hostname// so that /ho
