On 2/15/08, Roch Bourbonnais <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Le 15 févr. 08 à 11:38, Philip Beevers a écrit :
>
[...]
> > Obviously this isn't good behaviour, but it's particularly unfortunate
> > given that this checkpoint is stuff that I don't want to retain in any
> > kind of cache anyway - i
On 8/10/06, Eric Schrock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 12:11:46PM -0700, David Coronel wrote:
> So far I understand that if a file is to be modified, it will first
> copy the data to be modified in a new location in the ZFS pool, then
> modify that new data and do all the ZFS
On 8/8/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,Solaris 10 GA + latest recommended patches:while runing dtrace:bash-3.00# dtrace -n 'io:::start [EMAIL PROTECTED], args[2]->fi_pathname] = count();}'... oracle
On 8/7/06, Bryan Cantrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We've had a great relationship with Apple at the engineering level -- andindeed, Team DTrace just got back from dinner with the Apple engineersinvolved with the port. More details here:
http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/bmc?entry=dtrace_on_mac_
On 8/7/06, Robert Gordon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Aug 7, 2006, at 7:17 PM, Tao Chen wrote:> In terms of openness, Sun and Apple are going opposite directions> IMHO, interesting situation :)>> TaoApple just released the Darwin Kernel code "
xnu-792-10.96"the eq
On 8/7/06, Eric Schrock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 01:19:14PM -1000, David J. Orman wrote:>> > (actually did they give OpenSolaris a name check at all when they> > mentioned DTrace ?)>> Nope, not that I can see. Apple's pretty notorious for that kind of
> "oversight". I used
On 8/7/06, Tim Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
David Magda wrote:> Well, they've ported Dtrace:> > "..now built into Mac OS X Leopard. Xray. Because it's 2006."Uh right and they're actually shipping it in 2007. Apple marketing.
Anyone want to start printing t-shirts:"DTrace & Time Machine in Open
I am reading the live coverage of WWDC keynote here:http://www.macrumorslive.com/web/They talked about a new feature in OS X/Leopard: "Time Machine".
Does it sound like instant snapshot and rollback to you?I don't know how else this can be implemented.10:37 am with time machine, you can get thos
On 7/17/06, Jonathan Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi All,I've just built an 8 disk zfs storage box, and I'm in the testing phase before I put it into production. I've run into some unusual results, and I was hoping the community could offer some suggestions. I've bascially made the switch to
On 6/23/06, Richard Elling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
comment on analysis below...Tao Chen wrote:> === Top 5 Devices with largest number of I/Os ===>> DEVICE READ AVG.ms MBWRITE AVG.ms M
I should copy this to the list.-- Forwarded message --On 6/23/06,
Joe Little <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I can post back to Roch what this latency is. I think the latency is aconstant regardless of the zil or not. all that I do by disabling thezil is that I'm able to submit larger
Hello Robert,
On 6/1/06, Robert Milkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Anton,
Thursday, June 1, 2006, 5:27:24 PM, you wrote:
ABR> What about small random writes? Won't those also require reading
ABR> from all disks in RAID-Z to read the blocks for update, where in
ABR> mirroring only one d
On 5/12/06, Roch Bourbonnais - Performance Engineering
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: Gregory Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Regarding directio and quickio, is there a way with ZFS to skip the
system buffer cache? I've seen big benefits for using directio when
the data files have been segre
On 5/11/06, Peter Rival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Richard Elling wrote:
> Oracle will zero-fill the tablespace with 128kByte iops -- it is not
> sparse. I've got a scar. Has this changed in the past few years?
Multiple parallel tablespace creates is usually a big pain point for
filesystem /
14 matches
Mail list logo
