Re: [zfs-discuss] Hard Errors on HDDs

2011-01-14 Thread solaris
Richard Elling richard.ell...@gmail.com writes: In my experience, this looks like a set of devices sitting behind an expander. I have seen one bad disk take out all disks sitting behind an expander. I have also seen bad disk firmware take out all disks behind an expander. I once saw a bad

[zfs-discuss] Strategies to avoid single point of failure w/ X45x0 Servers?

2008-10-09 Thread Solaris
I have been leading the charge in my IT department to evaluate the Sun Fire X45x0 as a commodity storage platform, in order to leverage capacity and cost against our current NAS solution which is backed by EMC Fiberchannel SAN. For our corporate environments, it would seem like a single machine

Re: [zfs-discuss] Strategies to avoid single point of failure w/ X45x0 Servers?

2008-10-09 Thread Solaris
their BlueArc san and spent 100k for 15TB (raw)... I spent 50K for 33TB (useable)... David David Glaser Systems Administrator LSA Information Technology University of Michigan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Solaris Sent: Thursday

[zfs-discuss] Interesting Pool Import Failure

2008-09-16 Thread Solaris
Hello... Since there has been much discussion about zpool import failures resulting in loss of an entire pool, I thought I would illustrate a scenario I just went through to recover a faulted pool that wouldn't import under Solaris 10 U5. While this is a simple scenario, and the data

[zfs-discuss] df -[k|h] SegFault / coredump after creating zpool...

2008-03-12 Thread Solaris
Greetings, I have Sun Fire 4600 running Solaris 10, running Sun Cluster 3.2. SunOS hubdb004 5.10 Generic_120012-14 i86pc i386 i86pc We ran into some space issues in /usr today, so as a quick fix, I created a slice (c5t0d0s12) with about 25GB of disk in order to create some zfs filesystems

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs-discuss Digest, Vol 24, Issue 5

2007-10-03 Thread Solaris
Richard, Having read your blog regarding the copies feature, do you have an opinion on whether mirroring or copies are better for a SAN situation? It strikes me that since we're discussing SAN and not local physical disk, that for a system needing 100GB of usable storage (size chosen for

Re: [zfs-discuss] Best option for my home file server?

2007-09-27 Thread Solaris
and to an even number of disks. I still have yet to purchase the system due to my issues with finding the right board with the right SATA controller. My desktop system at home runs an nVidia 590a chipset on a Foxconn motherboard and Solaris U3 will only recognize the DVD drive during installation

Re: [zfs-discuss] Best option for my home file server?

2007-09-27 Thread Solaris
I considered this as well, but that's the beauty of marrying ZFS with a hotplug SATA backplane :) I chose the to use the 5-in-3 hot-swap chassis in order to give me a way to upgrade capacity in place, though the 4-in-3 would be as easy, though with higher risk. 1. hot-plug a new 500GB SATA disk

Re: [zfs-discuss] Best option for my home file server?

2007-09-27 Thread Solaris
You don't have to do it all at once... ZFS will function fine with 1 large disk and 1 small disk in a mirror, it just means you will only have the as much space as the smaller disk. As of things now, if you have multiple vdevs in a pool and they are of diverse capacities, the striping becomes

[zfs-discuss] zfs / zpool list odd results in U4

2007-09-19 Thread Solaris
Greetings. I applied the Recommended Patch Cluster including 120012-14 to a U3 system today. I upgraded my zpool and it seems like we have some very strange information coming from zpool list and zfs list... [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/]# zfs list NAMEUSED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT zpool02

Re: [zfs-discuss] How do I get my pool back?

2007-09-13 Thread Solaris
Try exporting the pool then import it. I have seen this after moving disks between systems, and on a couple of occasions just rebooting. On 9/13/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 15:19:02 +0100 From: Peter Tribble [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [zfs-discuss]

Re: [zfs-discuss] How do I get my pool back?

2007-09-13 Thread Solaris
suggestion would not be applicable to your situation. On 9/13/07, Peter Tribble [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/13/07, Solaris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Try exporting the pool then import it. I have seen this after moving disks between systems, and on a couple of occasions just rebooting

[zfs-discuss] Consequences of adding a root vdev later?

2007-09-05 Thread Solaris
Is it possible to force ZFS to nicely re-organize data inside a zpool after a new root level vdev has been introduced? e.g. Take a pool with 1 vdev consisting of a 2 disk mirror. Populate some arbitrary files using about 50% of the capacity. Then add another 2 mirrored disks to the pool. It

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS Under the Hood Presentation Slides

2007-08-17 Thread Joy Marshall - Solaris Revenue Product Engineering
Hi Jim, The handout referenced is in fact the second of the two PDF documents posted on the LOSUG website. Cheers, Joy Jim Mauro wrote: Is the referenced Laminated Handout on slide 3 available anywhere in any form electronically? If not, I'd be happy to create an electronic copy and

Re: [zfs-discuss] How to interrupt a zpool scrub?

2007-03-05 Thread Peter Dennis - Solaris Sustaining Engineering
Hi Thomas, The man page for zpool has: zpool scrub [-s] pool ... Begins a scrub. The scrub examines all data in the specified pools to verify that it checksums correctly. For replicated (mirror or raidz) devices, ZFS automati- cally repairs