Re: [zfs-discuss] [Fwd: [zfs-auto-snapshot] Heads up: SUNWzfs-auto-snapshot obsoletion in snv 128]

2009-11-17 Thread Daniel Carosone
I welcome the re-write. The deficiencies of the current snapshot cleanup implementation have been a source of constant background irritation to me for a while, and the subject of a few bugs. Regarding the issues in contention - the send hooks capability is useful and should remain, but the i

Re: [zfs-discuss] [Fwd: [zfs-auto-snapshot] Heads up: SUNWzfs-auto-snapshot obsoletion in snv 128]

2009-11-17 Thread Craig S. Bell
I don't have any problem with a rewrite, but please allow a non-GUI-dependent solution for headless servers. Also please add rsync as an option, rather than replacing zfs send/recv. Thanks. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss

[zfs-discuss] [Fwd: [zfs-auto-snapshot] Heads up: SUNWzfs-auto-snapshot obsoletion in snv 128]

2009-11-17 Thread Tim Foster
Hi all, Just forwarding Niall's heads-up message about the impending removal of the existing zfs-auto-snapshot implementation in nv_128 I've not been involved in the rewrite, but what I've read about the new code, it'll be a lot more efficient than the old ksh-based code, and will fix many of the