- Original Message -
Hi all
I just did a small test on RAIDz2 to check whether my suspicion was
right about ZFS not treating spares as replicas/copies of drives, and
I think I've found it true. The short story: If two spares replaces
two drives in raidz2, losing a third drive, even
I understand that some of it may be a simple bug, but should it hang _all_ the
pools? That's what happens when the third drive is removed...
roy
- Original Message -
This looks like a pretty simple bug. The issue is that the state of the SPARE
vdev is being reported as REMOVED
This looks like a pretty simple bug. The issue is that the state of the
SPARE vdev is being reported as REMOVED instead of DEGRADED. If it were the
latter (as it should be), then everything would work just fine. Please file
a bug at bugs.illumos.org.
On a side note, this continues to expose
So should I post a bug, or is there one there already?
Btw, I can't reach http://bugs.illumos.org/ - it times out
roy
- Original Message -
We've talked about this, and I will be putting together a fix for this
incorrect state handling. :-)
- Garrett
On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 11:50
On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 18:03 +0100, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
So should I post a bug, or is there one there already?
Btw, I can't reach http://bugs.illumos.org/ - it times out
Try again in a few minutes... the server just got rebooted.
- Garrett
roy
- Original Message
