al == Adam Leventhal a...@eng.sun.com writes:
al As always, we welcome feedback (although zfs-discuss is not
al the appropriate forum),
``Please, you criticize our work in private while we compliment it in
public.''
pgpyrrUQeYImd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Miles Nordin car...@ivy.net wrote:
al == Adam Leventhal a...@eng.sun.com writes:
al As always, we welcome feedback (although zfs-discuss is not
al the appropriate forum),
``Please, you criticize our work in private while we compliment it in
public.''
tc == Tim Cook t...@cook.ms writes:
tc I'm betting its more the fact that zfs-discuss is not
Firstly, there's no need for you to respond on anyone's behalf,
especially not by ``betting.''
Secondly, fishworks does run ZFS, and I for one am interested in what
works and what doesn't.
tc
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Miles Nordin car...@ivy.net wrote:
tc == Tim Cook t...@cook.ms writes:
tc I'm betting its more the fact that zfs-discuss is not
Firstly, there's no need for you to respond on anyone's behalf,
especially not by ``betting.''
I'm not betting, I know. It's
On Mar 5, 2010, at 5:10 PM, James Dickens wrote:
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 4:48 PM, Tonmaus sequoiamo...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi,
so, what would be a critical test size in your opinion? Are there any other
side conditions?
when your dedup hash table ( a table that holds a checksum of every
Hi,
I have tried what dedup does on a test dataset that I have filled with 372 GB
of partly redundant data. I have used snv_133. All in all, it was successful.
The net data volume was only 120 GB. Destruction of the dataset finally took a
while, but without any compromise of anything else.
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Tonmaus sequoiamo...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi,
I have tried what dedup does on a test dataset that I have filled with 372 GB
of partly redundant data. I have used snv_133. All in all, it was successful.
The net data volume was only 120 GB. Destruction of the
Hi,
so, what would be a critical test size in your opinion? Are there any other
side conditions?
I.e., I am not using any snapshots and have also turned off automatic snapshots
because I was bitten by system hangs while destroying datasets with living
snapshots.
I am also aware that Fishworks
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 4:48 PM, Tonmaus sequoiamo...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi,
so, what would be a critical test size in your opinion? Are there any other
side conditions?
when your dedup hash table ( a table that holds a checksum of every block
seen on filesystems/zvols after dedup was enabled)
Hi all,
Now that the Fishworks 2010.Q1 release seems to get deduplication, does anyone
know if bugid: 6924824 (destroying a dedup-enabled dataset bricks system) is
still valid, it has not been fixed in in onnv and it is not mentioned in the
release notes.
This is one of the bugs i've been
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 8:08 AM, Henrik Johansson henr...@henkis.net wrote:
Hi all,
Now that the Fishworks 2010.Q1 release seems to get deduplication, does
anyone know if bugid: 6924824 (destroying a dedup-enabled dataset bricks
system) is still valid, it has not been fixed in in onnv and it is
On 3/4/10 9:17 AM, Brent Jones wrote:
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 8:08 AM, Henrik Johanssonhenr...@henkis.net wrote:
Hi all,
Now that the Fishworks 2010.Q1 release seems to get deduplication, does
anyone know if bugid: 6924824 (destroying a dedup-enabled dataset bricks
system) is still valid, it
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 4:40 PM, zfs ml zf...@itsbeen.sent.com wrote:
On 3/4/10 9:17 AM, Brent Jones wrote:
My rep says Use dedupe at your own risk at this time.
Guess they've been seeing a lot of issues, and regardless if its
'supported' or not, he said not to use it.
So its not a
It seems they kind of rushed the appliance into the market. We've a few 7410s
and replication (with zfs send/receive) doesn't work after shares reach ~1TB
(broken pipe error).
While it's the case that the 7000 series is a relatively new product, the
characterization of rushed to market is
14 matches
Mail list logo
