[zfs-discuss] How well does zfs mirror handle temporary disk offlines?

2011-01-18 Thread Philip Brown
Sorry if this is well known.. I tried a bunch of googles, but didnt get anywhere useful. Closest I came, was http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-discuss/2009-April/028090.html but that doesnt answer my question, below, reguarding zfs mirror recovery. Details of our needs follow. We norm

Re: [zfs-discuss] How well does zfs mirror handle temporary disk offlines?

2011-01-18 Thread Torrey McMahon
On 1/18/2011 2:46 PM, Philip Brown wrote: My specific question is, how easily does ZFS handle*temporary* SAN disconnects, to one side of the mirror? What if the outage is only 60 seconds? 3 minutes? 10 minutes? an hour? Depends on the multipath drivers and the failure mode. For example, if

Re: [zfs-discuss] How well does zfs mirror handle temporary disk offlines?

2011-01-18 Thread Erik Trimble
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 14:51 -0500, Torrey McMahon wrote: > > On 1/18/2011 2:46 PM, Philip Brown wrote: > > My specific question is, how easily does ZFS handle*temporary* SAN > > disconnects, to one side of the mirror? > > What if the outage is only 60 seconds? > > 3 minutes? > > 10 minutes? > >

Re: [zfs-discuss] How well does zfs mirror handle temporary disk offlines?

2011-01-18 Thread Chris Banal
Erik Trimble wrote: On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 14:51 -0500, Torrey McMahon wrote: On 1/18/2011 2:46 PM, Philip Brown wrote: My specific question is, how easily does ZFS handle*temporary* SAN disconnects, to one side of the mirror? What if the outage is only 60 seconds? 3 minutes? 10 minutes? an ho

Re: [zfs-discuss] How well does zfs mirror handle temporary disk offlines?

2011-01-18 Thread Philip Brown
> On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 14:51 -0500, Torrey McMahon > wrote: > > ZFS's ability to handle "short-term" interruptions > depend heavily on the > underlying device driver. > > If the device driver reports the device as > "dead/missing/etc" at any > point, then ZFS is going to require a "zpool replace"

Re: [zfs-discuss] How well does zfs mirror handle temporary disk offlines?

2011-01-18 Thread Erik Trimble
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 13:34 -0800, Philip Brown wrote: > > On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 14:51 -0500, Torrey McMahon > > wrote: > > > > ZFS's ability to handle "short-term" interruptions > > depend heavily on the > > underlying device driver. > > > > If the device driver reports the device as > > "dead/mi

Re: [zfs-discuss] How well does zfs mirror handle temporary disk offlines?

2011-01-18 Thread Edward Ned Harvey
> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss- > boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Erik Trimble > > As far as what the resync does: ZFS does "smart" resilvering, in that > it compares what the "good" side of the mirror has against what the > "bad" side has, and only copies t