On 12/12/06, James F. Hranicky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jim Davis wrote:
>> Have you tried using the automounter as suggested by the linux faq?:
>> http://nfs.sourceforge.net/#section_b
>
> Yes. On our undergrad timesharing system (~1300 logins) we actually hit
> that limit with a standard au
Jim Davis wrote:
>> Have you tried using the automounter as suggested by the linux faq?:
>> http://nfs.sourceforge.net/#section_b
>
> Yes. On our undergrad timesharing system (~1300 logins) we actually hit
> that limit with a standard automounting scheme. So now we make static
> mounts of the N
Hello Jim,
Wednesday, December 6, 2006, 3:28:53 PM, you wrote:
JD> We have two aging Netapp filers and can't afford to buy new Netapp gear,
JD> so we've been looking with a lot of interest at building NFS fileservers
JD> running ZFS as a possible future approach. Two issues have come up in the
J
Jim Davis wrote:
eric kustarz wrote:
What about adding a whole new RAID-Z vdev and dynamicly stripe across
the RAID-Zs? Your capacity and performance will go up with each
RAID-Z vdev you add.
Thanks, that's an interesting suggestion.
This has the benefit of allowing you to grow into your s
Jim Davis wrote:
eric kustarz wrote:
What about adding a whole new RAID-Z vdev and dynamicly stripe across
the RAID-Zs? Your capacity and performance will go up with each
RAID-Z vdev you add.
Thanks, that's an interesting suggestion.
Have you tried using the automounter as suggested b
Edward Pilatowicz wrote:
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 07:28:53AM -0700, Jim Davis wrote:
We have two aging Netapp filers and can't afford to buy new Netapp gear,
so we've been looking with a lot of interest at building NFS fileservers
running ZFS as a possible future approach. Two issues have come u
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 07:28:53AM -0700, Jim Davis wrote:
> We have two aging Netapp filers and can't afford to buy new Netapp gear,
> so we've been looking with a lot of interest at building NFS fileservers
> running ZFS as a possible future approach. Two issues have come up in the
> discussion
eric kustarz wrote:
What about adding a whole new RAID-Z vdev and dynamicly stripe across
the RAID-Zs? Your capacity and performance will go up with each RAID-Z
vdev you add.
Thanks, that's an interesting suggestion.
Have you tried using the automounter as suggested by the linux faq?:
h
Jim Davis wrote:
We have two aging Netapp filers and can't afford to buy new Netapp gear,
so we've been looking with a lot of interest at building NFS fileservers
running ZFS as a possible future approach. Two issues have come up in
the discussion
- Adding new disks to a RAID-Z pool (Netapps
You can add more disks to a pool that is in raid-z you just can't
add disks to the existing raid-z vdev.
cd /usr/tmp
mkfile -n 100m 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
zpool create t raidz /usr/tmp/1 /usr/tmp/2 /usr/tmp/3
zpool status t
zfs list t
zpool add -f t raidz2 /usr/tmp/4 /usr/tmp/5 /usr/tmp/6 /usr
>- The default scheme of one filesystem per user runs into problems with
>linux NFS clients; on one linux system, with 1300 logins, we already have
>to do symlinks with amd because linux systems can't mount more than about
>255 filesystems at once. We can of course just have one filesystem
>e
On Wed, 6 Dec 2006, Jim Davis wrote:
We have two aging Netapp filers and can't afford to buy new Netapp gear,
so we've been looking with a lot of interest at building NFS fileservers
running ZFS as a possible future approach. Two issues have come up in the
discussion
- Adding new disks to a RAI
On Wed, 6 Dec 2006, Jim Davis wrote:
> We have two aging Netapp filers and can't afford to buy new Netapp gear,
> so we've been looking with a lot of interest at building NFS fileservers
> running ZFS as a possible future approach. Two issues have come up in the
> discussion
>
> - Adding new disk
We have two aging Netapp filers and can't afford to buy new Netapp gear,
so we've been looking with a lot of interest at building NFS fileservers
running ZFS as a possible future approach. Two issues have come up in the
discussion
- Adding new disks to a RAID-Z pool (Netapps handle adding new
14 matches
Mail list logo
